Literature DB >> 2299577

Effect of keratometer and axial length measurement errors on primary implant power calculations.

J R McEwan, R K Massengill, S D Friedel.   

Abstract

Analytical predictions of primary implant power using presumptive errors in keratometer and axial length measurements were performed using the modified Binkhorst, modified Colenbrander, Holladay, Hoffer, and SRK II equations. These predictions demonstrate that the contributions to primary implant power error resulting from inaccurate axial length and keratometer measurements are algebraically additive. In eyes with a normal axial length, the resulting implant power determination error can be larger than differences in implant power prediction among these five IOL equations. Calculations using measurement errors of 0.2 mm in axial length and 0.50 diopter (D) in corneal curvature predicted a worst case primary implant power error of +/- 1.17 D. These calculations were performed using an axial length and corneal curvature near the population mean. In contrast, implant equation variability was determined to be +/- 0.19 D by calculating the standard deviation of the five implant power formulas with the measurement errors set to zero. Implant power prediction errors were increased when a flat cornea was paired with an axial hyperopic or an axial myopic eye. These combinations maximize the implant power error resulting from both implant formula variation and inaccurate measurements. Primary implant power error prediction tables are presented for emmetropic, axial hyperopic, and axial myopic eyes, as a function of presumed errors in axial length and corneal curvature. These error predictions clearly show that inaccuracy in axial length measurements and keratometer readings can be first order determinants of postoperative spherical refractive error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299577     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80876-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  [Effect of applanation tonometry on precision of biometry measurements].

Authors:  T M Rabsilber; S Bueltmann; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Authors:  Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Sara Bigdeli; Ashkan Shahnazi; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  The effect of Gonioscopy on keratometry and corneal surface topography.

Authors:  Mathew K George; Thomas Kuriakose; Brian M DeBroff; John W Emerson
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Intraocular lens power estimation in combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membranes: a case-control study.

Authors:  Min Kim; Hyoung Eun Kim; Dong Hyun Lee; Hyoung Jun Koh; Sung Chul Lee; Sung Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for keratometry measurement.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Samira Heydarian; Abbas Ali Yekta; Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim; Mahin Ahmadi-Pishkuhi; Mehrnaz Valadkhan; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Ahmad Ahmadzadeh Amiri; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-07-10

6.  Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes.

Authors:  Moonjung Kim; Eui S Han
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  Prediction of refractive error in combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery with one-piece acrylic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Dong Kyu Lee; Sung Jin Lee; Yong Sung You
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12

8.  Refractive change following pseudophakic vitrectomy.

Authors:  Sinead Byrne; James Ng; Anthony Hildreth; Jean-Pierre Danjoux; David Hw Steel
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.