Literature DB >> 22984789

Structural equation model trees.

Andreas M Brandmaier1, Timo von Oertzen, John J McArdle, Ulman Lindenberger.   

Abstract

In the behavioral and social sciences, structural equation models (SEMs) have become widely accepted as a modeling tool for the relation between latent and observed variables. SEMs can be seen as a unification of several multivariate analysis techniques. SEM Trees combine the strengths of SEMs and the decision tree paradigm by building tree structures that separate a data set recursively into subsets with significantly different parameter estimates in a SEM. SEM Trees provide means for finding covariates and covariate interactions that predict differences in structural parameters in observed as well as in latent space and facilitate theory-guided exploration of empirical data. We describe the methodology, discuss theoretical and practical implications, and demonstrate applications to a factor model and a linear growth curve model. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22984789      PMCID: PMC4386908          DOI: 10.1037/a0030001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  11 in total

1.  Adult age differences in task switching.

Authors:  J Kray; U Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-03

2.  The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.

Authors:  C K Enders
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

3.  Age-based construct validation using structural equation modeling.

Authors:  J J McArdle; C A Prescott
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1992 Autumn-Winter       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research.

Authors:  J L Horn; J J McArdle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1992 Autumn-Winter       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  An abductive theory of scientific method.

Authors:  Brian D Haig
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; W Kyle Simmons; Patrick S F Bellgowan; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models.

Authors:  J J McArdle; D Epstein
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1987-02

8.  Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures.

Authors:  J J McArdle; R P McDonald
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; James Malley; Gerhard Tutz
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-12

10.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Achim Zeileis; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  23 in total

1.  Feature Selection Methods for Optimal Design of Studies for Developmental Inquiry.

Authors:  Timothy R Brick; Rachel E Koffer; Denis Gerstorf; Nilam Ram
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Network Trees: A Method for Recursively Partitioning Covariance Structures.

Authors:  Payton J Jones; Patrick Mair; Thorsten Simon; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A Comparison of Methods for Uncovering Sample Heterogeneity: Structural Equation Model Trees and Finite Mixture Models.

Authors:  Ross Jacobucci; Kevin J Grimm; John J McArdle
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.125

4.  Development and validation of empirically derived frequency criteria for NSSI disorder using exploratory data mining.

Authors:  Brooke A Ammerman; Ross Jacobucci; Evan M Kleiman; Jennifer J Muehlenkamp; Michael S McCloskey
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-05-12

5.  Hippocampal Subfields and Limbic White Matter Jointly Predict Learning Rate in Older Adults.

Authors:  Andrew R Bender; Andreas M Brandmaier; Sandra Düzel; Attila Keresztes; Ofer Pasternak; Ulman Lindenberger; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Finding structure in data using multivariate tree boosting.

Authors:  Patrick J Miller; Gitta H Lubke; Daniel B McArtor; C S Bergeman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Brain Biomarkers of Vulnerability and Progression to Psychosis.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Statistical Power of Alternative Structural Models for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Advantages of Modeling Unreliability.

Authors:  Emil N Coman; Eugen Iordache; Lisa Dierker; Judith Fifield; Jean J Schensul; Suzanne Suggs; Russell Barbour
Journal:  J Mod Appl Stat Methods       Date:  2014-05-01

9.  A Practical Guide to Variable Selection in Structural Equation Models with Regularized MIMIC Models.

Authors:  Ross Jacobucci; Andreas M Brandmaier; Rogier A Kievit
Journal:  Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-03-25

10.  Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Eunsook Kim; John M Ferron; Robert F Dedrick; Tony X Tan; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.