Literature DB >> 28164232

Feature Selection Methods for Optimal Design of Studies for Developmental Inquiry.

Timothy R Brick1, Rachel E Koffer1, Denis Gerstorf1,2,3, Nilam Ram1,3.   

Abstract

Objectives: As diary, panel, and experience sampling methods become easier to implement, studies of development and aging are adopting more and more intensive study designs. However, if too many measures are included in such designs, interruptions for measurement may constitute a significant burden for participants. We propose the use of feature selection-a data-driven machine learning process-in study design and selection of measures that show the most predictive power in pilot data. Method: We introduce an analytical paradigm based on the feature importance estimation and recursive feature elimination with decision tree ensembles and illustrate its utility using empirical data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
Results: We identified a subset of 20 measures from the SOEP data set that maintain much of the ability of the original data set to predict life satisfaction and health across younger, middle, and older age groups. Discussion: Feature selection techniques permit researchers to choose measures that are maximally predictive of relevant outcomes, even when there are interactions or nonlinearities. These techniques facilitate decisions about which measures may be dropped from a study while maintaining efficiency of prediction across groups and reducing costs to the researcher and burden on the participants.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Big data methods; Feature selection; Longitudinal analysis; Measurement; Study design

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28164232      PMCID: PMC6075467          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbx008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  20 in total

1.  Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness.

Authors:  Bruce Headey; Ruud Muffels; Gert G Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Learning Nonlinear Functions Using Regularized Greedy Forest.

Authors:  Rie Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 3.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Yvan Saeys; Iñaki Inza; Pedro Larrañaga
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Forecasting life satisfaction across adulthood: benefits of seeing a dark future?

Authors:  Frieder R Lang; David Weiss; Denis Gerstorf; Gert G Wagner
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-02-18

5.  Optimal study design with identical power: an application of power equivalence to latent growth curve models.

Authors:  Timo von Oertzen; Andreas M Brandmaier
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-04-15

6.  Get The FACS Fast: Automated FACS face analysis benefits from the addition of velocity.

Authors:  Timothy R Brick; Michael D Hunter; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  Int Conf Affect Comput Intell Interact Workshops       Date:  2009-09-01

7.  A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Alan B Krueger; David A Schkade; Norbert Schwarz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data.

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; B Michael Kelm; Ralf Masuch; Uwe Himmelreich; Peter Bachert; Wolfgang Petrich; Fred A Hamprecht
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Structural equation model trees.

Authors:  Andreas M Brandmaier; Timo von Oertzen; John J McArdle; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-09-17

10.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.

Authors:  Zoran Bursac; C Heath Gauss; David Keith Williams; David W Hosmer
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2008-12-16
View more
  7 in total

1.  Individualized Modeling to Distinguish Between High and Low Arousal States Using Physiological Data.

Authors:  Ame Osotsi; Zita Oravecz; Qunhua Li; Joshua Smyth; Timothy R Brick
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2020-01-22

2.  A machine learning approach to identifying important features for achieving step thresholds in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Allison E Miller; Emily Russell; Darcy S Reisman; Hyosub E Kim; Vu Dinh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Investigating Predictors of Cognitive Decline Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ramon Casanova; Santiago Saldana; Michael W Lutz; Brenda L Plassman; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Kathleen M Hayden
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Low-Burden Mobile Monitoring, Intervention, and Real-Time Analysis Using the Wear-IT Framework: Example and Usability Study.

Authors:  Timothy R Brick; James Mundie; Jonathan Weaver; Robert Fraleigh; Zita Oravecz
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2020-06-17

5.  The Promise and Challenges of Intensive Longitudinal Designs for Imbalance Models of Adolescent Substance Use.

Authors:  David M Lydon-Staley; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-28

6.  Subjective and objective difficulty of emotional facial expression perception from dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Jan N Schneider; Magdalena Matyjek; Anne Weigand; Isabel Dziobek; Timothy R Brick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  A Multiclass Classification Model for Tooth Removal Procedures.

Authors:  W M de Graaf; T C T van Riet; J de Lange; J Kober
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 8.924

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.