RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A novel ventilation imaging method based on four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) has been applied to the field of radiation oncology. Understanding its reproducibility is a prerequisite for clinical applications. The purpose of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging over different days and the same session. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two ventilation images were created from repeat 4D CT scans acquired over the average time frames of 15 days for 6 lung cancer patients and 5 minutes for another 6 patients. The reproducibility was quantified using the voxel-based Spearman rank correlation coefficients for all lung voxels and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for the spatial overlap of segmented high-, moderate-, and low-functional lung volumes. Furthermore, the relationship between the variation in abdominal motion range as a measure of the depth of breathing and variation in ventilation was evaluated using linear regression. RESULTS: The voxel-based correlation between the two ventilation images was moderate on average (0.50 ± 0.15). The DSCs were also moderate for the high- (0.60 ± 0.08), moderate- (0.46 ± 0.06), and low-functional lung (0.58 ± 0.09). No patients demonstrated strong correlations. The relationship between the motion range variation and ventilation variation was found to be moderate and significant. CONCLUSIONS: We investigated the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging over the time frames of 15 days and 5 minutes and found that it was only moderately reproducible. Respiratory variation during 4D CT scans was found to deteriorate the reproducibility. Improvement of 4D CT imaging is necessary to increase the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A novel ventilation imaging method based on four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) has been applied to the field of radiation oncology. Understanding its reproducibility is a prerequisite for clinical applications. The purpose of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging over different days and the same session. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two ventilation images were created from repeat 4D CT scans acquired over the average time frames of 15 days for 6 lung cancerpatients and 5 minutes for another 6 patients. The reproducibility was quantified using the voxel-based Spearman rank correlation coefficients for all lung voxels and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for the spatial overlap of segmented high-, moderate-, and low-functional lung volumes. Furthermore, the relationship between the variation in abdominal motion range as a measure of the depth of breathing and variation in ventilation was evaluated using linear regression. RESULTS: The voxel-based correlation between the two ventilation images was moderate on average (0.50 ± 0.15). The DSCs were also moderate for the high- (0.60 ± 0.08), moderate- (0.46 ± 0.06), and low-functional lung (0.58 ± 0.09). No patients demonstrated strong correlations. The relationship between the motion range variation and ventilation variation was found to be moderate and significant. CONCLUSIONS: We investigated the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging over the time frames of 15 days and 5 minutes and found that it was only moderately reproducible. Respiratory variation during 4D CT scans was found to deteriorate the reproducibility. Improvement of 4D CT imaging is necessary to increase the reproducibility of 4D CT ventilation imaging.
Authors: Judith A Christian; Mike Partridge; Elena Nioutsikou; Gary Cook; Helen A McNair; Bernadette Cronin; Frederic Courbon; James L Bedford; Michael Brada Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-11-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sarah M McGuire; Sumin Zhou; Lawrence B Marks; Mark Dewhirst; Fang-Fang Yin; Shiva K Das Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: T Usenius; J P Usenius; M Tenhunen; P Vainio; R Johansson; S Soimakallio; R Kauppinen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-10-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Konstantin Lavrenkov; Judith A Christian; Mike Partridge; Elena Niotsikou; Gary Cook; Michelle Parker; James L Bedford; Michael Brada Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Junan Zhang; Jinli Ma; Sumin Zhou; Jessica L Hubbs; Terence Z Wong; Rodney J Folz; Elizabeth S Evans; Ronald J Jaszczak; Robert Clough; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tokihiro Yamamoto; Sven Kabus; Cristian Lorenz; Eric Johnston; Peter G Maxim; Maximilian Diehn; Neville Eclov; Cristian Barquero; Billy W Loo; Paul J Keall Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Douglas Brennan; Leah Schubert; Quentin Diot; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Thomas Guerrero; Mary K Martel; Derek Linderman; Laurie E Gaspar; Moyed Miften; Brian D Kavanagh; Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Phillip J Koo; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Thomas Guerrero; Laurie E Gaspar; Moyed Miften; Brian D Kavanagh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tokihiro Yamamoto; Sven Kabus; Cristian Lorenz; Erik Mittra; Julian C Hong; Melody Chung; Neville Eclov; Jacqueline To; Maximilian Diehn; Billy W Loo; Paul J Keall Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tokihiro Yamamoto; Sven Kabus; Matthieu Bal; Karl Bzdusek; Paul J Keall; Cari Wright; Stanley H Benedict; Megan E Daly Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Wei Shao; Taylor J Patton; Sarah E Gerard; Yue Pan; Joseph M Reinhardt; Oguz C Durumeric; John E Bayouth; Gary E Christensen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 10.048