Literature DB >> 22959904

Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception.

James Trussell1, Nathaniel Henry, Fareen Hassan, Alexander Prezioso, Amy Law, Anna Filonenko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the total costs of unintended pregnancy (UP) in the United States (US) from a third-party health care payer perspective and explored the potential role for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in reducing UP and resulting health care expenditure. STUDY
DESIGN: An economic model was constructed to estimate direct costs of UP as well as the proportion of UP costs that could be attributed to imperfect contraceptive adherence. The model considered all women requiring reversible contraception in the US: the pattern of contraceptive use and the rates of UP were derived from published sources. The costs of UP in the United States and the proportion of total cost that might be avoided by improved adherence through increased use of LARC were estimated.
RESULTS: Annual medical costs of UP in the United States were estimated to be $4.6 billion, and 53% of these were attributed to imperfect contraceptive adherence. If 10% of women aged 20-29 years switched from oral contraception to LARC, total costs would be reduced by $288 million per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Imperfect contraceptive adherence leads to substantial UP and high, avoidable costs. Improved uptake of LARC may generate health care cost savings by reducing contraceptive non-adherence.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22959904      PMCID: PMC3659779          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  12 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Reproductive consequences of contraceptive failure in 19 developing countries.

Authors:  John Cleland; Mohamed M Ali
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  Karen W Hoover; Guoyu Tao; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

5.  The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Kathryn Kooistra
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-01-10

7.  Unintended pregnancy and taxpayer spending.

Authors:  Emily Monea; Adam Thomas
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-05-19

8.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12
View more
  70 in total

1.  Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Rachel Paul; Ragini Maddipati; Christina Buckel; Melody Goodman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Women's Reproductive Rights Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A State-Level Analysis to Assess the Role of Race and Nativity Status.

Authors:  May Sudhinaraset; Dovile Vilda; Jessica D Gipson; Marta Bornstein; Maeve E Wallace
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Katherine J Sapra; Rosalind B King; Jean Fredo Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Adolescent substance use and unplanned pregnancy: strategies for risk reduction.

Authors:  Hilary Smith Connery; Brittany B Albright; John M Rodolico
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Development and psychometric testing of the attitude toward potential pregnancy scale.

Authors:  Mary T Paterno; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2014-10-14

8.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg in contraception.

Authors:  James Trussell; Fareen Hassan; Nathaniel Henry; Jennifer Pocoski; Amy Law; Anna Filonenko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.