Literature DB >> 21477680

Contraceptive failure in the United States.

James Trussell1.   

Abstract

This review provides an update of previous estimates of first-year probabilities of contraceptive failure for all methods of contraception available in the United States. Estimates are provided of probabilities of failure during typical use (which includes both incorrect and inconsistent use) and during perfect use (correct and consistent use). The difference between these two probabilities reveals the consequences of imperfect use; it depends both on how unforgiving of imperfect use a method is and on how hard it is to use that method perfectly. These revisions reflect new research on contraceptive failure both during perfect use and during typical use.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21477680      PMCID: PMC3638209          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  72 in total

1.  Actual cost of providing long-acting reversible contraception: a study of Implanon cost.

Authors:  Clare Lipetz; Ceri Phillips; Charlotte Fleming
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2009-04

2.  The efficacy and safety of a low-dose, 91-day, extended-regimen oral contraceptive with continuous ethinyl estradiol.

Authors:  Robin Kroll; Kathleen Z Reape; Marya Margolis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Caroline Harvey; Charrlotte Seib; Jayne Lucke
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Insertion and 3-year follow-up experience of 372 etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants by family physicians in Granada, Spain.

Authors:  Lorenzo Arribas-Mir; Dolores Rueda-Lozano; María Agrela-Cardona; Tania Cedeño-Benavides; Carmen Olvera-Porcel; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Contraception with an injectable progestin. A study of its use in postpartum women.

Authors:  D R Mishell; M A el-Habashy; R G Good; D L Moyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1968-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning.

Authors:  Marcos Arévalo; Victoria Jennings; Minna Nikula; Irit Sinai
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  One-year assessment of women receiving sub-dermal contraceptive implant at Siriraj Family Planning Clinic.

Authors:  Manopchai Thamkhantho; Supanee Jivasak-Apimas; Surasak Angsuwathana; Gessuda Chiravacharadej; Jarataporn Intawong
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2008-06

8.  Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Rachel Jones
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Efficacy and safety of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone 3 mg and ethinylestradiol 20 mcg in a 24/4-day regimen.

Authors:  László Hernádi; Joachim Marr; Dietmar Trummer; Vincenzo De Leo; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Subcutaneous DMPA vs. intramuscular DMPA: a 2-year randomized study of contraceptive efficacy and bone mineral density.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz; Philip D Darney; Douglas Ross; Kevin D Wolter; Leon Speroff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  306 in total

1.  Knowledge of and concerns about long-acting reversible contraception among women in medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Alexis K Matusiewicz; Heidi S Melbostad; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

3.  Effect of HIV status on fertility desire and knowledge of long-acting reversible contraception of postpartum Malawian women.

Authors:  Michele S O'Shea; Nora E Rosenberg; Mina C Hosseinipour; Gretchen S Stuart; William C Miller; Stephen M Kaliti; Mwawi Mwale; Phylos P Bonongwe; Jennifer H Tang
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2014-11-04

4.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Improving the Implementation of Evidence-Based Clinical Practices in Adolescent Reproductive Health Care Services.

Authors:  Lisa M Romero; Dawn Middleton; Trisha Mueller; Lia Avellino; Rachel Hallum-Montes
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Contraceptive Initiation Among Women in the United States: Timing, Methods Used, and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Mara E Murray Horwitz; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; David L Eisenberg; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Expanding Contraception Access for Women With Opioid-Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study of Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Emily A Hurley; Alex Duello; Sarah Finocchario-Kessler; Kathy Goggin; Stephani Stancil; Rachel P Winograd; Melissa K Miller
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2020-05-29

9.  Different Pearl Indices in studies of hormonal contraceptives in the United States: impact of study population.

Authors:  Christoph Gerlinger; James Trussell; Uwe Mellinger; Martin Merz; Joachim Marr; Ralf Bannemerschult; Ilka Schellschmidt; Jan Endrikat
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Contraceptive Use and Pregnancy Incidence Among Women Participating in an HIV Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Carolyne A Akello; Katherine E Bunge; Clemensia Nakabiito; Brenda G Mirembe; Mary Glenn Fowler; Anupam Mishra; Jeanne Marrazzo; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Connie Celum; Jennifer E Balkus
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.