Literature DB >> 31132346

Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.

Tessa Madden1, Rachel Paul2, Ragini Maddipati2, Christina Buckel2, Melody Goodman3, Jeffrey F Peipert4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare unintended pregnancy rates at 12 months between women receiving structured contraceptive counseling plus usual contraceptive care and women receiving structured contraceptive counseling, healthcare provider education and cost support for long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods. STUDY
DESIGN: Using a controlled time-trend study design, we first enrolled 502 women receiving structured contraceptive counseling in addition to usual care ("Enhanced Care") and subsequently enrolled 506 women receiving counseling plus healthcare provider education and cost support for LARC methods ("Complete CHOICE") at three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Cost support included funds to health centers for "on-the-shelf" LARC methods and no-cost LARC methods for uninsured women. Participants completed in-person baseline surveys and follow-up surveys by telephone at 3, 6 and 12 months. We used Kaplan-Meier survival function to estimate 12-month unintended pregnancy rates and Cox proportional-hazards regression to compare unintended pregnancy rates between the two groups. We imputed pregnancy outcomes for women lost to follow-up (9%) prior to 12 months.
RESULTS: "Complete CHOICE" participants were less likely to report an unintended pregnancy at 12 months compared to "Enhanced Care"; 5.3 vs. 9.8 pregnancies per 100 women-years (p=.01). After adjusting for confounders (recruitment site, race, age and federal poverty level), women in "Complete CHOICE" had a 40% lower risk of unintended pregnancy at 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive provision that includes cost support and healthcare provider education in addition to patient counseling reduced unintended pregnancy at 12 months compared to counseling plus usual contraceptive care. IMPLICATIONS: A program of contraceptive care that includes comprehensive counseling; healthcare provider education; cost support; and on-the-shelf, long-acting reversible contraception can reduce unintended pregnancy compared to contraceptive counseling in addition to usual health center care in the FQHC setting.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptive counseling; Contraceptive implant; Intrauterine device; Long-acting reversible contraception; Unintended pregnancy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31132346      PMCID: PMC6699922          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  21 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emiko Petrosky; Tessa Madden; David Eisenberg; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  P D Blumenthal; A Voedisch; K Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

9.  Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  James Trussell; Nathaniel Henry; Fareen Hassan; Alexander Prezioso; Amy Law; Anna Filonenko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  3 in total

1.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Rachel Paul; Bridget C Huysman; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Patient and counselor satisfaction with structured contraceptive counseling by health center staff in federally qualified health centers.

Authors:  Bridget C Huysman; Rachel Paul; Adriana Nigaglioni Rivera; Elana Tal; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Alison B Comfort; Maya Blum; Corinne H Rocca; Charles E McCulloch; Lavanya Rao; Nishant Shah; Helen Oquendo Del Toro; Suzan Goodman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.