Literature DB >> 22956287

Do humans and nonhuman animals share the grouping principles of the iambic-trochaic law?

Daniela M de la Mora1, Marina Nespor, Juan M Toro.   

Abstract

The iambic-trochaic law describes humans' tendency to form trochaic groups over sequences varying in pitch or intensity (i.e., the loudest or highest sounds mark group beginnings), and iambic groups over sequences varying in duration (i.e., the longest sounds mark group endings). The extent to which these perceptual biases are shared by humans and nonhuman animals is yet unclear. In Experiment 1, we trained rats to discriminate pitch-alternating sequences of tones from sequences randomly varying in pitch. In Experiment 2, rats were trained to discriminate duration-alternating sequences of tones from sequences randomly varying in duration. We found that nonhuman animals group sequences based on pitch variations as trochees, but they do not group sequences varying in duration as iambs. Importantly, humans grouped the same stimuli following the principles of the iambic-trochaic law (Exp. 3). These results suggest the early emergence of the trochaic rhythmic grouping bias based on pitch, possibly relying on perceptual abilities shared by humans and other mammals, whereas the iambic rhythmic grouping bias based on duration might depend on language experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22956287      PMCID: PMC4217152          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0371-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  How modality specific is the iambic-trochaic law? Evidence from vision.

Authors:  Marcela Peña; Ricardo A H Bion; Marina Nespor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The development of perceptual grouping biases in infancy: a Japanese-English cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Katherine A Yoshida; John R Iversen; Aniruddh D Patel; Reiko Mazuka; Hiromi Nito; Judit Gervain; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-02-09

3.  The processing of duration and intensity cues to prominence.

Authors:  A E Turk; J R Sawusch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The search for phonology in other species.

Authors:  Moira J Yip
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; K Hirsh-Pasek; D G Nelson; L J Kennedy; A Woodward; J Piwoz
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys.

Authors:  F Ramus; M D Hauser; C Miller; D Morris; J Mehler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The use of prosodic cues in language discrimination tasks by rats.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Josep B Trobalon; Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Neurophysics of temporal discrimination in the rat: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Clémence Roger; Thierry Hasbroucq; Arnaud Rabat; Franck Vidal; Borís Burle
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; A Cutler; N J Redanz
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1993-06

10.  Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning.

Authors:  Jessica F Hay; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2012-11
View more
  23 in total

1.  Cross-linguistic differences in the use of durational cues for the segmentation of a novel language.

Authors:  Mikhail Ordin; Leona Polyanskaya; Itziar Laka; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

2.  Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants.

Authors:  Judit Gervain; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Animal Pitch Perception: Melodies and Harmonies.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2017

4.  Frequency-based organization of speech sequences in a nonhuman animal.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marina Nespor; Judit Gervain
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-09-20

5.  Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  The "Globularization Hypothesis" of the Language-ready Brain as a Developmental Frame for Prosodic Bootstrapping Theories of Language Acquisition.

Authors:  Aritz Irurtzun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-09

7.  Experience-dependent emergence of a grouping bias.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Discrimination of acoustic patterns in rats using the water T-maze.

Authors:  Daniela M de la Mora; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Psicologica (Valencia)       Date:  2014

9.  The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Juan M Toro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 10.  Searching for the origins of musicality across species.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; Hugo Merchant; Yukiko Kikuchi; Yuko Hattori; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.