Literature DB >> 26398859

Frequency-based organization of speech sequences in a nonhuman animal.

Juan M Toro1, Marina Nespor2, Judit Gervain3.   

Abstract

A recurrent question regarding language acquisition is the extent to which the mechanisms human infants use to discover patterns over the linguistic signal are highly specialized and uniquely human, or are the result of more general mechanisms present in other species. Research with very young infants suggests that they are able to use the relative frequency of elements in a linguistic sequence to infer word order. Here we ask if this ability could emerge from grouping biases present in nonhuman mammals. We show that animals discover differences in the frequency of elements in a sequence and can learn the relative order of frequent and infrequent elements. Nevertheless, in animals, relative frequency does not appear to be overridden by other cues that have been shown to be important to human infants, such as prosody. Our results demonstrate that the basic mechanism that allows listeners to extract ordering relations based on frequency is shared across species.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative cognition; Function words; Prosody; Word frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26398859      PMCID: PMC5564493          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  22 in total

1.  How pigeons discriminate the relative frequency of events.

Authors:  R Keen; A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.

Authors:  Mohinish Shukla; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress; Luca L Bonatti
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-11

4.  How modality specific is the iambic-trochaic law? Evidence from vision.

Authors:  Marcela Peña; Ricardo A H Bion; Marina Nespor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The development of perceptual grouping biases in infancy: a Japanese-English cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Katherine A Yoshida; John R Iversen; Aniruddh D Patel; Reiko Mazuka; Hiromi Nito; Judit Gervain; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-02-09

6.  Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants.

Authors:  Mohinish Shukla; Katherine S White; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants.

Authors:  Judit Gervain; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences.

Authors:  Ricardo A H Bion; Silvia Benavides-Varela; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning.

Authors:  Jessica F Hay; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2012-11

10.  Do humans and nonhuman animals share the grouping principles of the iambic-trochaic law?

Authors:  Daniela M de la Mora; Marina Nespor; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Generalizing prosodic patterns by a non-vocal learning mammal.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Evolutionarily conserved neural signatures involved in sequencing predictions and their relevance for language.

Authors:  Yukiko Kikuchi; William Sedley; Timothy D Griffiths; Christopher I Petkov
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.