Literature DB >> 21707216

How modality specific is the iambic-trochaic law? Evidence from vision.

Marcela Peña1, Ricardo A H Bion, Marina Nespor.   

Abstract

The iambic-trochaic law has been proposed to account for the grouping of auditory stimuli: Sequences of sounds that differ only in duration are grouped as iambs (i.e., the most prominent element marks the end of a sequence of sounds), and sequences that differ only in pitch or intensity are grouped as trochees (i.e., the most prominent element marks the beginning of a sequence). In 3 experiments, comprising a familiarization and a test phase, we investigated whether a similar grouping principle is also present in the visual modality. During familiarization, sequences of visual stimuli were repeatedly presented to participants, who were asked to memorize their order of presentation. In the test phase, participants were better at remembering fragments of the familiarization sequences that were consistent with the iambic-trochaic law. Thus, they were better at remembering fragments that had the element with longer duration in final position (iambs) and fragments that had the element with either higher temporal frequency or higher intensity in initial position (trochees), as compared with fragments that were inconsistent with the iambic-trochaic law or that never occurred during familiarization. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21707216     DOI: 10.1037/a0023944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Cross-linguistic differences in the use of durational cues for the segmentation of a novel language.

Authors:  Mikhail Ordin; Leona Polyanskaya; Itziar Laka; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

2.  Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning.

Authors:  Jessica F Hay; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2012-11

3.  Do humans and nonhuman animals share the grouping principles of the iambic-trochaic law?

Authors:  Daniela M de la Mora; Marina Nespor; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Frequency-based organization of speech sequences in a nonhuman animal.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marina Nespor; Judit Gervain
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-09-20

5.  Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Rhythm on Your Lips.

Authors:  Marcela Peña; Alan Langus; César Gutiérrez; Daniela Huepe-Artigas; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-08

7.  Selective auditory grouping by zebra finches: testing the iambic-trochaic law.

Authors:  Michelle Spierings; Jeroen Hubert; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Experience-dependent emergence of a grouping bias.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Prosody in the hands of the speaker.

Authors:  Bahia Guellaï; Alan Langus; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-07

10.  An Exploration of Rhythmic Grouping of Speech Sequences by French- and German-Learning Infants.

Authors:  Nawal Abboub; Natalie Boll-Avetisyan; Anjali Bhatara; Barbara Höhle; Thierry Nazzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.