Literature DB >> 25285599

The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Paola Crespo-Bojorque1, Juan M Toro1.   

Abstract

Traditionally, physical features in musical chords have been proposed to be at the root of consonance perception. Alternatively, recent studies suggest that different types of experience modulate some perceptual foundations for musical sounds. The present study tested whether the mechanisms involved in the perception of consonance are present in an animal with no extensive experience with harmonic stimuli and a relatively limited vocal repertoire. In Experiment 1, rats were trained to discriminate consonant from dissonant chords and tested to explore whether they could generalize such discrimination to novel chords. In Experiment 2, we tested if rats could discriminate between chords differing only in their interval ratios and generalize them to different octaves. To contrast the observed pattern of results, human adults were tested with the same stimuli in Experiment 3. Rats successfully discriminated across chords in both experiments, but they did not generalize to novel items in either Experiment 1 or Experiment 2. On the contrary, humans not only discriminated among both consonance-dissonance categories, and among sets of interval ratios, they also generalized their responses to novel items. These results suggest that experience with harmonic sounds may be required for the construction of categories among stimuli varying in frequency ratios. However, the discriminative capacity observed in rats suggests that at least some components of auditory processing needed to distinguish chords based on their interval ratios are shared across species. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25285599      PMCID: PMC5564495          DOI: 10.1037/a0037991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  27 in total

1.  Ultrasonic vocalizations as indices of affective states in rats.

Authors:  Brian Knutson; Jeffrey Burgdorf; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The statistical structure of human speech sounds predicts musical universals.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Accurate recovery of articulator positions from acoustics: new conclusions based on human data.

Authors:  J Hogden; A Lofqvist; V Gracco; I Zlokarnik; P Rubin; E Saltzman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of music by infants.

Authors:  M R Zentner; J Kagan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Preference for consonant over dissonant tones in the albino rat.

Authors:  H A Fannin; W G Braud
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1971-02

Review 7.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms.

Authors:  A J Doupe; P K Kuhl
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Japanese monkeys perceive sensory consonance of chords.

Authors:  A Izumi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Validation of an auditory sensory reinforcement paradigm: Campbell's monkeys (Cercopithecus campbelli) do not prefer consonant over dissonant sounds.

Authors:  Hiroki Koda; Muriel Basile; Marion Olivier; Kevin Remeuf; Sumiharu Nagumo; Catherine Blois-Heulin; Alban Lemasson
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Stepwise acquisition of vocal combinatorial capacity in songbirds and human infants.

Authors:  Dina Lipkind; Gary F Marcus; Douglas K Bemis; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Nori Jacoby; Miki Takahasi; Kenta Suzuki; Olga Feher; Primoz Ravbar; Kazuo Okanoya; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Constraints on Statistical Learning Across Species.

Authors:  Chiara Santolin; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.

Authors:  Peter M C Harrison; Marcus T Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.

Authors:  Bernhard Wagner; Daniel L Bowling; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Is Harmonicity a Misnomer for Cultural Familiarity in Consonance Preferences?

Authors:  Imre Lahdelma; Tuomas Eerola; James Armitage
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-28

5.  Detecting surface changes in a familiar tune: exploring pitch, tempo and timbre.

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Alexandre Celma-Miralles; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Processing advantages for consonance: A comparison between rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Juan M Toro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Non-expert listeners show decreased heart rate and increased blood pressure (fear bradycardia) in response to atonal music.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Luigi Manfrin; Laura A Arcari; Francesco De Benedetto; Martina Gazzola; Matteo Guardamagna; Valentina Lozano Nasi; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.