Literature DB >> 22955112

Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Barbara A Bernhardt1, Danielle Soucier, Karen Hanson, Melissa S Savage, Laird Jackson, Ronald J Wapner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genomic microarrays can detect copy-number variants not detectable by conventional cytogenetics. This technology is diffusing rapidly into prenatal settings even though the clinical implications of many copy-number variants are currently unknown. We conducted a qualitative pilot study to explore the experiences of women receiving abnormal results from prenatal microarray testing performed in a research setting.
METHODS: Participants were a subset of women participating in a multicenter prospective study "Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis by Array-based Copy Number Analysis." Telephone interviews were conducted with 23 women receiving abnormal prenatal microarray results.
RESULTS: We found that five key elements dominated the experiences of women who had received abnormal prenatal microarray results: an offer too good to pass up, blindsided by the results, uncertainty and unquantifiable risks, need for support, and toxic knowledge.
CONCLUSION: As prenatal microarray testing is increasingly used, uncertain findings will be common, resulting in greater need for careful pre- and posttest counseling, and more education of and resources for providers so they can adequately support the women who are undergoing testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955112      PMCID: PMC3877835          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  37 in total

1.  Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: how well are we doing?

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  H Statham; W Solomou; L Chitty
Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-08

3.  Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.

Authors:  C-N Lee; S-Y Lin; C-H Lin; J-C Shih; T-H Lin; Y-N Su
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011.

Authors:  A Novelli; F R Grati; L Ballarati; L Bernardini; D Bizzoco; L Camurri; R Casalone; L Cardarelli; P Cavalli; R Ciccone; M Clementi; L Dalprà; M Gentile; G Gelli; P Grammatico; M Malacarne; A M Nardone; V Pecile; G Simoni; O Zuffardi; D Giardino
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Referral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Mindy Preston Dabell; Jill A Rosenfeld; Nicholas J Neill; Blake C Ballif; Justine Coppinger; Noa Rinzler Diwan; Karen Chong; Mordechai Shohat; David Chitayat
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  Array technology in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Orsetta Zuffardi; Annalisa Vetro; Paul Brady; Joris Vermeesch
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Healing fictions': stories of choosing in the aftermath of the detection of fetal anomalies.

Authors:  M Sandelowski; L C Jones
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Family-centered care in the context of fetal abnormality.

Authors:  Elisabeth D Howard
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

9.  The decision to continue: the experiences and needs of parents who receive a prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly.

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kate Berg; Maximilian Muenke; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-11-01

10.  What keeps you up at night? Genetics professionals' distressing experiences in patient care.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Rachel Silver; Cynda Hylton Rushton; Ellyn Micco; Gail Geller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  63 in total

1.  Qualitative Research on Expanded Prenatal and Newborn Screening: Robust but Marginalized.

Authors:  Rachel Grob
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Impacts of variants of uncertain significance on parental perceptions of children after prenatal chromosome microarray testing.

Authors:  Preeya Desai; Hannah Haber; Jessica Bulafka; Amita Russell; Rebecca Clifton; Julia Zachary; Seonjoo Lee; Tianshu Feng; Ronald Wapner; Catherine Monk; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

5.  An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Katherine Kellom; Alexandra Barbarese; W Andrew Faucett; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Communicating microarray results of uncertain clinical significance in consultation summary letters and implications for practice.

Authors:  Jean Lillian Paul; Rachel Pope-Couston; Samantha Wake; Trent Burgess; Tiong Yang Tan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies.

Authors:  Josephine Johnston; John D Lantos; Aaron Goldenberg; Flavia Chen; Erik Parens; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 9.  Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Judith L M McCoyd; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  National Society Of Genetic Counselors Natalie Weissberger Paul National Leadership Award Address: "Patients and Research: Paths to Personal and Professional Growth".

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.