Literature DB >> 22262341

Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011.

A Novelli1, F R Grati, L Ballarati, L Bernardini, D Bizzoco, L Camurri, R Casalone, L Cardarelli, P Cavalli, R Ciccone, M Clementi, L Dalprà, M Gentile, G Gelli, P Grammatico, M Malacarne, A M Nardone, V Pecile, G Simoni, O Zuffardi, D Giardino.   

Abstract

A precise guideline establishing chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) applications and platforms in the prenatal setting does not exist. The controversial question is whether CMA technologies can or should soon replace standard karyotyping in prenatal diagnostic practice. A review of the recent literature and survey of the knowledge and experience of all members of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU) Committee were carried out in order to propose recommendations for the use of CMA in prenatal testing. The analysis of datasets reported in the medical literature showed a considerable 6.4% incidence of pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) in the group of pregnancies with sonographically detected fetal abnormalities and normal karyotype. The reported CNVs are likely to have a relevant role in terms of nosology for the fetus and in the assessment of reproductive risk for the couple. Estimation of the frequency of copy number variations of uncertain significance (VOUS) varied depending on the different CMA platforms used, ranging from 0-4%, obtained using targeted arrays, to 9-12%, obtained using high-resolution whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. CMA analysis can be considered a second-tier diagnostic test to be used after standard karyotyping in selected groups of pregnancies, namely those with single (apparently isolated) or multiple ultrasound fetal abnormalities, those with chromosomal rearrangements, even if apparently balanced, and those with supernumerary marker chromosomes.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22262341     DOI: 10.1002/uog.11092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  16 in total

1.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  A new case of interstitial 1q 25.3-32.1 deletion: cytogenetic analysis molecular characterization and ultrasound findings.

Authors:  Francesco Libotte; Domenico Bizzoco; Ivan Gabrielli; Caterina Tamburrino; Cristina Ernandez; Lorena Carpineto; Maria Pia D'Aleo; Antonella Cima; Alvaro Mesoraca; Pietro Cignini; Alessia Aloisi; Roberto Angioli; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

Review 3.  Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma.

Authors:  Anupama Srinivasan; Diana W Bianchi; Hui Huang; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Karyotype analysis in large-sample infertile couples living in Central China: a study of 14965 couples.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Xiang-dong Kong; Qing-hua Wu; Gang Li; Lin Song; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosome Abnormalities: A 13-Year Institution Experience.

Authors:  Carmen Comas; Mónica Echevarria; María Ángeles Rodríguez; Ignacio Rodríguez; Bernat Serra; Vincenzo Cirigliano
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2012-11-19

7.  Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Anita S Y Kan; Elizabeth T Lau; W F Tang; Sario S Y Chan; Simon C K Ding; Kelvin Y K Chan; C P Lee; Pui Wah Hui; Brian H Y Chung; K Y Leung; Teresa Ma; Wing C Leung; Mary H Y Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience.

Authors:  Olga Zilina; Rita Teek; Pille Tammur; Kati Kuuse; Maria Yakoreva; Eve Vaidla; Triin Mölter-Väär; Tiia Reimand; Ants Kurg; Katrin Ounap
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Prenatal Diagnosis by Chromosome Microarray Analysis, An Indian Experience.

Authors:  Meena Bajaj Lall; Shruti Agarwal; Preeti Paliwal; Pushpa Saviour; Anju Joshi; Arti Joshi; Surbhi Mahajan; Sunita Bijarnia-Mahay; Ratna Dua Puri; I C Verma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-01-19

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.