Literature DB >> 10985942

Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies.

H Statham1, W Solomou, L Chitty.   

Abstract

When given an adverse prenatal diagnosis, parents are deeply shocked and experience acute grief. This review considers the psychological outcomes for parents whether they opt to terminate the pregnancy or continue, either through choice or because termination is not an option. It covers the full spectrum of malformation from treatable, through those carrying a risk of significant handicap, to lethal. It draws on two types of studies: those that are retrospective and qualitative, describing feelings and aspects of care, and those that are prospective and assess psychological state with standardized measures of grief, anxiety and depression. The relationship between psychological outcome and possible associated variables, such as individual characteristics, nature of the abnormality and obstetric factors is described and evaluated. In addition, the authors draw on both scientific and support group literature to summarize good practice for the care of parents receiving an unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10985942     DOI: 10.1053/beog.2000.0108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol


  19 in total

1.  Pregnancy continuation and organizational religious activity following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect are associated with improved psychological outcome.

Authors:  Simon Gregory; Allison Ashley-Koch; Heidi Cope; Melanie E Garrett
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy.

Authors:  Julie Chaplin; Robert Schweitzer; Shelley Perkoulidis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Parents' informational needs at the birth of a baby with a surgically correctable anomaly.

Authors:  L Aite; A Zaccara; A Trucchi; A Nahom; B Iacobelli; P Bagolan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Health-care provider communication with expectant parents during a prenatal diagnosis: an integrative review.

Authors:  A L Kratovil; W A Julion
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Is counselling for CCAM that difficult? Learning from parental experience.

Authors:  Lucia Aite; Antonio Zaccara; Alessandro Trucchi; Antonella Nahom; Irma Capolupo; Luisa Mobili; Pietro Bagolan
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-07

6.  Application of a Consumer Health Information Needs Taxonomy to Questions in Maternal-Fetal Care.

Authors:  Jared A Shenson; Ebone Ingram; Nadja Colon; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

7.  Towards a new procreation ethic: the exemplary instance of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Gaëlle Le Dref; Bruno Grollemund; Anne Danion-Grilliat; Jean-Christophe Weber
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

8.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Paternal psychological response after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies with a comparison to maternal response: a cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Kaasen; Anne Helbig; Ulrik Fredrik Malt; Tormod Naes; Hans Skari; Guttorm Nils Haugen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.