Literature DB >> 22951278

A paradigm for the development and evaluation of novel implant topologies for bone fixation: in vivo evaluation.

Jason P Long1, Scott J Hollister, Steven A Goldstein.   

Abstract

While contemporary prosthetic devices restore some function to individuals who have lost a limb, there are efforts to develop bio-integrated prostheses to improve functionality. A critical step in advancing this technology will be to securely attach the device to remnant bone. To investigate mechanisms for establishing robust implant fixation in bone while undergoing loading, we previously used a topology optimization scheme to develop optimized orthopedic implants and then fabricated selected designs from titanium (Ti)-alloy with selective laser sintering (SLS) technology. In the present study, we examined how implant architecture and mechanical stimulation influence osseointegration within an in vivo environment. To do this, we evaluated three implant designs (two optimized and one non-optimized) using a unique in vivo model that applied cyclic, tension/compression loads to the implants. Eighteen (six per implant design) adult male canines had implants surgically placed in their proximal, tibial metaphyses. Experimental duration was 12 weeks; daily loading (peak load of ±22 N for 1000 cycles) was applied to one of each animal's bilateral implants for the latter six weeks. Following harvest, osseointegration was assessed by non-destructive mechanical testing, micro-computed tomography (microCT) and back-scatter scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data revealed that implant loading enhanced osseointegration by significantly increasing construct stiffness, peri-implant trabecular morphology, and percentages of interface connectivity and bone ingrowth. While this experiment did not demonstrate a clear advantage associated with the optimized implant designs, osseointegration was found to be significantly influenced by aspects of implant architecture.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22951278      PMCID: PMC3462280          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  31 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive ceramic prosthetic coatings.

Authors:  P Ducheyne; J M Cuckler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Mechanical stimulation of tissue repair in the hydraulic bone chamber.

Authors:  R E Guldberg; N J Caldwell; X E Guo; R W Goulet; S J Hollister; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Vassilis Karageorgiou; David Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; S Goodman; S Toksvig-Larsen; L Ryd; T Albrektsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-04

5.  Relative effects of wound healing and mechanical stimulus on early bone response to porous-coated implants.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R E Guldberg; C L Kuelske; N J Caldwell; M Richards; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Trabecular bone adaptation to variations in porous-coated implant topology.

Authors:  R E Guldberg; M Richards; N J Caldwell; C L Kuelske; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Franchi Marco; Fini Milena; Giavaresi Gianluca; Ottani Vittoria
Journal:  Micron       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 2.251

8.  Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies.

Authors:  R Huiskes
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.500

Review 9.  The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Henry Ford Hosp Med J       Date:  1983

10.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; R M Pilliar; H U Cameron; G C Weatherly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  Altered collagen chemical compositional structure in osteopenic women with past fractures: A case-control Raman spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Gurjit S Mandair; Mohammed P Akhter; Francis W L Esmonde-White; Joan M Lappe; Susan P Bare; William R Lloyd; Jason P Long; Jessica Lopez; Kenneth M Kozloff; Robert R Recker; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.626

2.  Partial Bone Formation in Additive Manufactured Porous Implants Reduces Predicted Stress and Danger of Fatigue Failure.

Authors:  Vee San Cheong; Paul Fromme; Melanie J Coathup; Aadil Mumith; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.