Literature DB >> 8764877

Relative effects of wound healing and mechanical stimulus on early bone response to porous-coated implants.

S J Hollister1, R E Guldberg, C L Kuelske, N J Caldwell, M Richards, S A Goldstein.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that early bone adaptation to well fixed porous-coated implants is influenced more by wound healing than by mechanical loading. To test this hypothesis, two groups of dogs with identical, hydraulically controlled porous-coated implants interference fit within distal femoral trabecular bone were used. One group had no load: the other had 35 N of load applied to the implants. At 5 weeks after surgery, the resulting adaptation of bone around the implants was quantified on a cellular basis by cytochemical analysis of type-I procollagen synthesis and on a structural basis using three-dimensional micro-computed tomography imaging. The percentage of trabecular surfaces covered by osteoblasts expressing type-I procollagen was significantly increased in bone surrounding the implant in both groups compared with contralateral control bone tissue. There was no difference between the groups with no load or 35 N of load. In addition, measures of trabecular bone structure did not differ significantly between the load and no-load groups. Taken together, these results suggest that wound healing plays a much greater role in the early response of bone to well fixed porous-coated implants than does mechanical stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8764877     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100140422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  Cancellous bone adaptation to in vivo loading in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Timothy G Morgan; Xu Yang; Todd H Baldini; Elizabeth R Myers; Timothy M Wright; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The effects of loading on cancellous bone in the rabbit.

Authors:  Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Xu Yang; Timothy G Morgan; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Progression of bone ingrowth and attachment strength for stability of percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses.

Authors:  Sujee Jeyapalina; J Peter Beck; Roy D Bloebaum; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The effects of PTH, loading and surgical insult on cancellous bone at the bone-implant interface in the rabbit.

Authors:  Anna Fahlgren; Xu Yang; Cesare Ciani; James A Ryan; Natalie Kelly; Frank C Ko; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Sequential osseointegration from osseohealing to osseoremodeling - Histomorphological comparison of novel 3D porous and solid Ti-6Al-4V titanium implants.

Authors:  Alice Frosch; Sebastian Krohn; Gottfried Buchhorn; Wolfgang Lehmann; Karl-Heinz Frosch; László Füzesi; Stephan Frosch
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Hwabok Wee; Evan P Roush; Tiffany L Whitcomb; Christopher Murter; Gery Kozlansky; Akhlesh Lakhtakia; Allen R Kunselman; Henry J Donahue; April D Armstrong; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  A paradigm for the development and evaluation of novel implant topologies for bone fixation: in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Jason P Long; Scott J Hollister; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.712

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.