Literature DB >> 16182543

Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.

Franchi Marco1, Fini Milena, Giavaresi Gianluca, Ottani Vittoria.   

Abstract

Long-term clinical success of endosseous dental implants is critically related to a wide bone-to-implant direct contact. This condition is called osseointegration and is achieved ensuring a mechanical primary stability to the implant immediately after implantation. Both primary stability and osseointegration are favoured by micro-rough implant surfaces which are obtained by different techniques from titanium implants or coating the titanium with different materials. Host bone drilled cavity is comparable to a common bone wound. In the early bone response to the implant, the first tissue which comes into contact with the implant surface is the blood clot, with particular attention to platelets and fibrin. Peri-implant tissue healing starts with an inflammatory response as the implant is inserted in the bone cavity, but an early afibrillar calcified layer comparable to the lamina limitans or incremental lines in bone is just observable at the implant surface both in vitro than in vivo conditions. Just within the first day from implantation, mesenchymal cells, pre-osteoblasts and osteoblasts adhere to the implant surface covered by the afibrillar calcified layer to produce collagen fibrils of osteoid tissue. Within few days from implantation a woven bone and then a reparative trabecular bone with bone trabeculae delimiting large marrow spaces rich in blood vessels and mesenchymal cells are present at the gap between the implant and the host bone. The peri-implant osteogenesis can proceed from the host bone to the implant surface (distant osteogenesis) and from the implant surface to the host bone (contact osteogenesis) in the so called de novo bone formation. This early bone response to the implant gradually develops into a biological fixation of the device and consists in an early deposition of a newly formed reparative bone just in direct contact with the implant surface. Nowadays, senile and post-menopausal osteoporosis are extremely diffuse in the population and have important consequences on the clinical success of endosseous dental implants. In particular the systemic methabolic and site morphological conditions are not favorable to primary stability, biological fixation and final osseointegration. An early good biological fixation may allow the shortening of time before loading the implant, favouring the clinical procedure of early or immediate implant loading. Trabecular bone in implant biological fixation is gradually substituted by a mature lamellar bone which characterizes the implant ossoeintegration. As a final consideration, the mature lamellar bone observed in osseointegrated implants is not always the same as a biological turnover occurs in the peri-implant bone up to 1mm from the implant surface, with both osteogenesis and bone reabsorption processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16182543     DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micron        ISSN: 0968-4328            Impact factor:   2.251


  63 in total

1.  Preparation of superhydrophilic microrough titanium implant surfaces by alkali treatment.

Authors:  Stefano Tugulu; Konrad Löwe; Dieter Scharnweber; Falko Schlottig
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Titanium scaffold osteogenesis in healthy and osteoporotic rats is improved by the use of low-level laser therapy (GaAlAs).

Authors:  Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos; Mary Anne Moreira Barbara; Emanuel da Silva Rovai; Mariana de Oliveira França; Zahra Fernandes Ebrahim; Luis Gustavo Oliveira de Vasconcellos; Camila Deco Porto; Carlos Alberto Alves Cairo
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy-a review: heat generated by dental implant drills.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-02-18

4.  Comparative assessment of the interfacial soft and hard tissues investing implants and natural teeth in the macaque mandible.

Authors:  Chong Huat Siar; Chooi Gait Toh; Georgios E Romanos; Kok Han Ng
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Giro; Leandro Chambrone; Abrao Goldstein; Jose Augusto Rodrigues; Elton Zenóbio; Magda Feres; Luciene Cristina Figueiredo; Alessandra Cassoni; Jamil Awad Shibli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

6.  Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takaneka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Osseointegration improves bone-implant interface of pedicle screws in the growing spine: a biomechanical and histological study using an in vivo immature porcine model.

Authors:  Kanako Shiba; Hiroshi Taneichi; Takashi Namikawa; Satoshi Inami; Daisaku Takeuchi; Yutaka Nohara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Substituted hydroxyapatite coatings of bone implants.

Authors:  Daniel Arcos; María Vallet-Regí
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  Nanoparticles of cobalt-substituted hydroxyapatite in regeneration of mandibular osteoporotic bones.

Authors:  Nenad Ignjatović; Zorica Ajduković; Vojin Savić; Stevo Najman; Dragan Mihailović; Perica Vasiljević; Zoran Stojanović; Vuk Uskoković; Dragan Uskoković
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Antonio Di Stefano; Andrea Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.