Literature DB >> 15860204

Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.

Vassilis Karageorgiou1, David Kaplan.   

Abstract

Porosity and pore size of biomaterial scaffolds play a critical role in bone formation in vitro and in vivo. This review explores the state of knowledge regarding the relationship between porosity and pore size of biomaterials used for bone regeneration. The effect of these morphological features on osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo, as well as relationships to mechanical properties of the scaffolds, are addressed. In vitro, lower porosity stimulates osteogenesis by suppressing cell proliferation and forcing cell aggregation. In contrast, in vivo, higher porosity and pore size result in greater bone ingrowth, a conclusion that is supported by the absence of reports that show enhanced osteogenic outcomes for scaffolds with low void volumes. However, this trend results in diminished mechanical properties, thereby setting an upper functional limit for pore size and porosity. Thus, a balance must be reached depending on the repair, rate of remodeling and rate of degradation of the scaffold material. Based on early studies, the minimum requirement for pore size is considered to be approximately 100 microm due to cell size, migration requirements and transport. However, pore sizes >300 microm are recommended, due to enhanced new bone formation and the formation of capillaries. Because of vascularization, pore size has been shown to affect the progression of osteogenesis. Small pores favored hypoxic conditions and induced osteochondral formation before osteogenesis, while large pores, that are well-vascularized, lead to direct osteogenesis (without preceding cartilage formation). Gradients in pore sizes are recommended for future studies focused on the formation of multiple tissues and tissue interfaces. New fabrication techniques, such as solid-free form fabrication, can potentially be used to generate scaffolds with morphological and mechanical properties more selectively designed to meet the specificity of bone-repair needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860204     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  849 in total

1.  Bioprinting with human stem cell-laden alginate-gelatin bioink and bioactive glass for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Krishna C R Kolan; Julie A Semon; Bradley Bromet; Delbert E Day; Ming C Leu
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2019-07-12

2.  Effects of designed PLLA and 50:50 PLGA scaffold architectures on bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  Eiji Saito; Elly E Liao; Wei-Wen Hu; Paul H Krebsbach; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Engineering stem cells for treatment of osteochondral defects.

Authors:  Hossein Nejadnik; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; James S Wallace; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2011

Review 5.  Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Solaiman Tarafder
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Materials-Directed Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.

Authors:  J Kent Leach; Jacklyn Whitehead
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-03-14

7.  Fabrication of porous ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xinfeng Shi; Balaji Sitharaman; Quynh P Pham; Feng Liang; Katherine Wu; W Edward Billups; Lon J Wilson; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Effect of scaffold microarchitecture on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Ameya Phadke; YongSung Hwang; Su Hee Kim; Soo Hyun Kim; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Koichi Masuda; Shyni Varghese
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.942

9.  Enhanced In Vivo Bone and Blood Vessel Formation by Iron Oxide and Silica Doped 3D Printed Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Dishary Banerjee; Samuel Robertson; Sahar Vahabzadeh
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture.

Authors:  Hang Lin; Dongning Zhang; Peter G Alexander; Guang Yang; Jian Tan; Anthony Wai-Ming Cheng; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.