Literature DB >> 22949963

NFlex Dynamic Stabilization System : Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Multi-Center Study.

Jeffrey D Coe1, Scott H Kitchel, Hans Jörg Meisel, Charles H Wingo, Soo Eon Lee, Tae-Ahn Jahng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pedicle-based dynamic stabilization systems, in which semi-rigid rods or cords are used to restrict or control spinal segmental motion, aim to reduce or eliminate the drawbacks associated with rigid fusion. In this study, we analyzed the two-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with the NFlex (Synthes Spine, Inc.), a pedicle-based dynamic stabilization system.
METHODS: Five sites participated in a retrospective study of 72 consecutive patients who underwent NFlex stabilization. Of these 72 patients, 65 were available for 2-year follow-up. Patients were included based on the presence of degenerative disc disease (29 patients), degenerative spondylolisthesis (16 patients), lumbar stenosis (9 patients), adjacent segment degeneration (6 patients), and degenerative lumbar scoliosis (5 patients). The clinical outcome measures at each assessment were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to measure functional status. Radiographic assessments included evidence of instrumentation failure or screw loosening.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (26 men and 39 women) with a mean age of 54.5 years were included. Mean follow-up was 25.6 months. The mean VAS score improved from 8.1 preoperatively to 3.8 postoperatively, representing a 53% improvement, and the ODI score from 44.5 to 21.8, representing a 51% improvement. Improvements in pain and disability scores were statistically significant. Three implant-related complications were observed.
CONCLUSION: Posterior pedicle-based dynamic stabilization using the NFlex system seems effective in improving pain and functional scores, with sustained clinical improvement after two years. With appropriate patient selection, it may be considered an effective alternative to rigid fusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar spine; Non-fusion stabilization; Posterior dynamic stabilization; Spinal fusion

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949963      PMCID: PMC3424174          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.51.6.343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  27 in total

1.  [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up].

Authors:  P Guigui; P Wodecki; P Bizot; P Lambert; G Chaumeil; A Deburge
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-10

2.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Chou; Chien-Jen Hsu; Wei-Ning Chang; Chi-Yin Wong
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Jason M Highsmith; Luis M Tumialán; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 4.  Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Murali Kadaba; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-07

5.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

Authors:  N Boos; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Soo-Eon Lee; Sung-Bae Park; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Chun-Kee Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-05-20

8.  Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Stefan Schaeren; Bernard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients.

Authors:  T R Lehmann; K F Spratt; J E Tozzi; J N Weinstein; S J Reinarz; G Y el-Khoury; H Colby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Matthew Robbins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hybrid Surgery Combined with Dynamic Stabilization System and Fusion for the Multilevel Degenerative Disease of the Lumbosacral Spine.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun Jib Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Clinical Experiences of Non-fusion Dynamic Stabilization Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-02-03

3.  Additional decompression at adjacent segments leads to adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.

Authors:  Masayuki Miyagi; Osamu Ikeda; Seiji Ohtori; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Yukio Someya; Masataka Shibayama; Yasufumi Ogawa; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Hiroto Kamoda; Gen Arai; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Yasuchika Aoki; Tomoaki Toyone; Toshio Ooi; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Evaluation of efficacy of a new hybrid fusion device: a randomized, two-centre controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Siewe; Jan Bredow; Johannes Oppermann; Timmo Koy; Stefan Delank; Peter Knoell; Peer Eysel; Rolf Sobottke; Kourosh Zarghooni; Marc Röllinghoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Does the Addition of a Dynamic Pedicle Screw to a Fusion Segment Prevent Adjacent Segment Pathology in the Lumbar Spine?

Authors:  Hayati Aygun; Osman Yaray; Muren Mutlu
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

Review 6.  Pathoanatomic Risk Factors for Instability and Adjacent Segment Disease in Lumbar Spine: How to Use Topping Off?

Authors:  J Bredow; L Löhrer; J Oppermann; M J Scheyerer; R Sobottke; P Eysel; J Siewe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison between topping-off technology and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangyao Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Junzhe Ding; Xiangyu Li; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.