Literature DB >> 16481955

Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Klaus John Schnake1, Stefan Schaeren, Bernard Jeanneret.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether elastic stabilization with the Dynesys system (Zimmer Spine, Minneapolis, MN) provides enough stability to prevent further progression of spondylolisthesis as well as instability after decompression for spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, decompression and fusion is widely recommended. However, patients have donor site pain. In 1994, a dynamic transpedicular system (Dynesys) was introduced to the market, stating that stabilization is possible without bone grafting.
METHODS: A total of 26 patients (mean age 71 years) with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent interlaminar decompression and dynamic stabilization with the Dynesys system. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Operative data, clinical outcome, and plain and flexion/extension radiographs were obtained and compared to preoperative and postoperative data.
RESULTS: Mean leg pain decreased significantly (P < 0.01), and mean walking distance improved significantly to more than 1000 m (P < 0.01). There were 5 patients (21%) who still had some claudication. A total of 21 patients (87.5%) would undergo the same procedure again. Radiographically, no significant progression of spondylolisthesis could be detected. The implant failure rate was 17%, and none of them were clinically symptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, dynamic stabilization with the Dynesys system in addition to decompression leads to similar clinical results as seen in established protocols using decompression and fusion with pedicle screws. It maintains enough stability to prevent further progression of spondylolisthesis or instability. With the Dynesys system, no bone grafting is necessary, therefore, donor site morbidity can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481955     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000200092.49001.6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  62 in total

1.  Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Zagra; L Minoia; M Archetti; A S Corriero; K Ricci; M Teli; F Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez; Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos; Isabel Ramírez-Mora; Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivarez; Armando Alpizar-Aguirre; Guadalupe Sánchez-Bringas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Wolfgang Börm; Frerk Meyer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u (coflex).

Authors:  Seong-Cheol Park; Sang Hoon Yoon; Yong-Pyo Hong; Ki-Jeong Kim; Sang-Ki Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

7.  Clinical Experiences of Non-fusion Dynamic Stabilization Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-02-03

8.  Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Hideki Ohta; Masatoshi Naito; Yoshiyuki Matsumoto; George Huang; Masato Tatsumi; Yoshiharu Takemitsu; Hirotaka Kida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Midline synovial and ganglion cysts causing neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  Jonathan Pindrik; Mohamed Macki; Mohamad Bydon; Zahra Maleki; Ali Bydon
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.