STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the available literature reporting clinical results of using pedicle-based posterior dynamic stabilization systems in the lumbar spine. METHODS: A literature search was performed using a number of key words including: posterior dynamic stabilization, facet replacement, pedicle fixation. RESULTS: There is a wide array of pedicle-based, posterior dynamic stabilization systems available. Purported indications are also varied, spanning from degenerative disk disease to reconstruction after laminectomy for spinal stenosis. Short-term and mid-term clinical results of some of these devices are available. For many others, clinical studies are still underway or have just begun. CONCLUSIONS: For the spine community to draw sound conclusions that a posterior dynamic device is better than fusion, results from multiple, similarly designed, independently funded trials must be compiled, compared, and contrasted.
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the available literature reporting clinical results of using pedicle-based posterior dynamic stabilization systems in the lumbar spine. METHODS: A literature search was performed using a number of key words including: posterior dynamic stabilization, facet replacement, pedicle fixation. RESULTS: There is a wide array of pedicle-based, posterior dynamic stabilization systems available. Purported indications are also varied, spanning from degenerative disk disease to reconstruction after laminectomy for spinal stenosis. Short-term and mid-term clinical results of some of these devices are available. For many others, clinical studies are still underway or have just begun. CONCLUSIONS: For the spine community to draw sound conclusions that a posterior dynamic device is better than fusion, results from multiple, similarly designed, independently funded trials must be compiled, compared, and contrasted.
Authors: Andrea Baioni; Mario Di Silvestre; Tiziana Greggi; Francesco Vommaro; Francesco Lolli; Antonio Scarale Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Ioannis D Gelalis; Dimitrios V Papadopoulos; Dionysios K Giannoulis; Andreas G Tsantes; Anastasios V Korompilias Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2017-10-06
Authors: Eike Hoff; Patrick Strube; Antonius Rohlmann; Christian Gross; Michael Putzier Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jeffrey D Coe; Scott H Kitchel; Hans Jörg Meisel; Charles H Wingo; Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc Date: 2012-06-30