BACKGROUND: Facing critically low return per dollar invested on clinical research and clinical care, the American biomedical enterprise is in need of a significant transformation. A confluence of high-throughput "omic" technologies and increasing adoption of the electronic health record has fueled excitement for a new paradigm for biomedical research and practice. The ability to simultaneously measure thousands of molecular variables and assess their relationships with clinical data collected during the course of care could enable reclassification of disease not only by gross phenotypic observation but according to underlying molecular mechanism and influence of social determinants.In turn, this reclassification could enable development of targeted therapeutic interventions as well as disease prevention strategies at the individual and population levels. METHODS/ DESIGN: The MURDOCK Study consists of distinct project "horizons" or stages. Horizon 1 entailed the generation and analysis of molecular data for existing large,clinically well-annotated cohorts in four disease areas. Horizon 1.5 involves creating and maintaining a 50,000-person,community volunteer registry for biomarker signature validation and prospective studies, including integration of environmental and social data. Horizon 2 leverages and prospectively recruits Horizon 1.5 volunteers, and extends the study to additional disease areas of interest. Horizon 3 will expand the study through regional, national,and international partnerships. DISCUSSION: The MURDOCK Study embodies a new model of team science investigation and represents a significant resource for translational research. The study team invites inquiries to form new collaborations to exploit the rich resources provided by these biospecimens and associated study data.
BACKGROUND: Facing critically low return per dollar invested on clinical research and clinical care, the American biomedical enterprise is in need of a significant transformation. A confluence of high-throughput "omic" technologies and increasing adoption of the electronic health record has fueled excitement for a new paradigm for biomedical research and practice. The ability to simultaneously measure thousands of molecular variables and assess their relationships with clinical data collected during the course of care could enable reclassification of disease not only by gross phenotypic observation but according to underlying molecular mechanism and influence of social determinants.In turn, this reclassification could enable development of targeted therapeutic interventions as well as disease prevention strategies at the individual and population levels. METHODS/ DESIGN: The MURDOCK Study consists of distinct project "horizons" or stages. Horizon 1 entailed the generation and analysis of molecular data for existing large,clinically well-annotated cohorts in four disease areas. Horizon 1.5 involves creating and maintaining a 50,000-person,community volunteer registry for biomarker signature validation and prospective studies, including integration of environmental and social data. Horizon 2 leverages and prospectively recruits Horizon 1.5 volunteers, and extends the study to additional disease areas of interest. Horizon 3 will expand the study through regional, national,and international partnerships. DISCUSSION: The MURDOCK Study embodies a new model of team science investigation and represents a significant resource for translational research. The study team invites inquiries to form new collaborations to exploit the rich resources provided by these biospecimens and associated study data.
Entities:
Keywords:
Stratified medicine; biomarkers; biorepository; community registry; disease reclassification; personalized medicine
Authors: Laura P Svetkey; Jamy D Ard; Victor J Stevens; Catherine M Loria; Deb Y Young; Jack F Hollis; Lawrence J Appel; Phillip J Brantley; Betty M Kennedy; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Bryan C Batch; Leonor Corsino; Lillian F Lien; William M Vollmer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Laura P Svetkey; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jack F Hollis; Catherine M Loria; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Kristine Funk; Patti Smith; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Valerie Myers; Lillian F Lien; Daniel Laferriere; Betty Kennedy; Gerald J Jerome; Fran Heinith; David W Harsha; Pamela Evans; Thomas P Erlinger; Arline T Dalcin; Janelle Coughlin; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Champagne; Alan Bauck; Jamy D Ard; Kathleen Aicher Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R Sanders Williams; Patrick J Casey; Robert K Kamei; Edward G Buckley; Khee Chee Soo; Michael H Merson; Ranga K Krishnan; Victor J Dzau Journal: Acad Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ida Sim; Simona Carini; Samson Tu; Rob Wynden; Brad H Pollock; Shamim A Mollah; Davera Gabriel; Herbert K Hagler; Richard H Scheuermann; Harold P Lehmann; Knut M Wittkowski; Meredith Nahm; Suzanne Bakken Journal: Summit Transl Bioinform Date: 2010-03-01
Authors: Sayanti Bhattacharya; Ashley A Dunham; Melissa A Cornish; Victoria A Christian; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Meredith L Nahm; Marie Lynn Miranda; Robert M Califf; Rowena J Dolor; L Kristin Newby Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Daniel Parker; Richard Sloane; Carl F Pieper; Katherine S Hall; Virginia B Kraus; William E Kraus; Janet L Huebner; Olga R Ilkayeva; James R Bain; L Kristin Newby; Harvey Jay Cohen; Miriam C Morey Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Coralei E Neighbors; Angie E Wu; Douglas G Wixted; Brooke L Heidenfelder; Carla A Kingsbury; Heidi M Register; Raul Louzao; Richard Sloane; Julie Eckstrand; Carl C Pieper; Richard A Faldowski; Thomas N Denny; Christopher W Woods; L Kristin Newby Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2022-08-15 Impact factor: 3.940
Authors: Ben W Strauss; Ellis M Valentiner; Sayanti Bhattacharya; Michelle M Smerek; Ashley A Dunham; L Kristin Newby; Marie Lynn Miranda Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Katherine S Hall; Harvey J Cohen; Carl F Pieper; Gerda G Fillenbaum; William E Kraus; Kim M Huffman; Melissa A Cornish; Andrew Shiloh; Christy Flynn; Richard Sloane; L Kristin Newby; Miriam C Morey Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Ephraim L Tsalik; Laurel K Willig; Brandon J Rice; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Robert P Mohney; Jonathan E McDunn; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Neil A Miller; Eric S Mayer; Seth W Glickman; Anja K Jaehne; Robert H Glew; Mohan L Sopori; Ronny M Otero; Kevin S Harrod; Charles B Cairns; Vance G Fowler; Emanuel P Rivers; Christopher W Woods; Stephen F Kingsmore; Raymond J Langley Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 10.612