Katherine S Hall1,2,3,4, Harvey J Cohen1,2,3, Carl F Pieper1,2,5, Gerda G Fillenbaum1,2, William E Kraus1,2,3,6, Kim M Huffman1,2,3,6,7, Melissa A Cornish8, Andrew Shiloh2, Christy Flynn8, Richard Sloane1,2,5, L Kristin Newby3,8, Miriam C Morey1,2,3,4. 1. Duke Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center. 2. Duke Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, and. 3. Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and. 6. Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 7. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 8. Duke Translational Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of large-scale population studies have provided valuable information about physical performance in aged individuals; however, there is little information about trajectories of function and associations with age across the adult life span. We developed a mobility-focused physical performance screener designed to be appropriate for the adult life span. METHODS: The physical performance battery includes measures of mobility, strength, endurance, and balance. Physical activity (PA) was assessed with accelerometry. We examined age-related trends in physical performance and PA, and the relationship between physical performance and PA across the age range (30-90+), by decade, in 775 participants enrolled in the study 2012-2014. RESULTS: Physical performance was worse with increasing age decade. Although men performed better than women across all ages, the decrement by age group was similar between genders. Worsening physical performance was observed as early as the fifth decade for chair stands and balance and in the sixth decade for gait speed and aerobic endurance. The number and strength of significant associations between physical performance and PA increased with greater age: the greatest number of significant associations was seen in the 60-79 age groups, with fewer reported in the 30-59 and 80-90+ age groups. More PA was associated with better physical function. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the importance of a life span approach to studies of function and aging. This work points to the need for a physical performance screener that spans across adulthood as a clinical tool for identifying functional decline.
BACKGROUND: A number of large-scale population studies have provided valuable information about physical performance in aged individuals; however, there is little information about trajectories of function and associations with age across the adult life span. We developed a mobility-focused physical performance screener designed to be appropriate for the adult life span. METHODS: The physical performance battery includes measures of mobility, strength, endurance, and balance. Physical activity (PA) was assessed with accelerometry. We examined age-related trends in physical performance and PA, and the relationship between physical performance and PA across the age range (30-90+), by decade, in 775 participants enrolled in the study 2012-2014. RESULTS: Physical performance was worse with increasing age decade. Although men performed better than women across all ages, the decrement by age group was similar between genders. Worsening physical performance was observed as early as the fifth decade for chair stands and balance and in the sixth decade for gait speed and aerobic endurance. The number and strength of significant associations between physical performance and PA increased with greater age: the greatest number of significant associations was seen in the 60-79 age groups, with fewer reported in the 30-59 and 80-90+ age groups. More PA was associated with better physical function. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the importance of a life span approach to studies of function and aging. This work points to the need for a physical performance screener that spans across adulthood as a clinical tool for identifying functional decline.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Sayanti Bhattacharya; Ashley A Dunham; Melissa A Cornish; Victoria A Christian; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Meredith L Nahm; Marie Lynn Miranda; Robert M Califf; Rowena J Dolor; L Kristin Newby Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Katherine S Hall; Cheryl A Howe; Sharon R Rana; Clara L Martin; Miriam C Morey Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Sari Stenholm; Michelle Shardell; Stefania Bandinelli; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephen Kritchevsky; Kristine Yaffe; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ben W Strauss; Ellis M Valentiner; Sayanti Bhattacharya; Michelle M Smerek; Ashley A Dunham; L Kristin Newby; Marie Lynn Miranda Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Kylie Kavanagh; Fang-Chi Hsu; Ashley T Davis; Stephen B Kritchevsky; W Jack Rejeski; Sunghye Kim Journal: Geroscience Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Daniel Parker; Richard Sloane; Carl F Pieper; Katherine S Hall; Virginia B Kraus; William E Kraus; Janet L Huebner; Olga R Ilkayeva; James R Bain; L Kristin Newby; Harvey Jay Cohen; Miriam C Morey Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Rachel H Safeek; Katherine S Hall; Felipe Lobelo; Carlos Del Rio; Audrey L Khoury; Tammy Wong; Miriam C Morey; Mehri S McKellar Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Carlos J Padilla; Markus E Harrigan; Hallie Harris; Jan M Schwab; Seward B Rutkove; Mark M Rich; Brian C Clark; W David Arnold Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Mariann M Gabrawy; Sarah Campbell; Mary Anna Carbone; Tatiana V Morozova; Gunjan H Arya; Lavanya B Turlapati; Jeremy D Walston; Michelle Starz-Gaiano; Logan Everett; Trudy F C Mackay; Jeff Leips; Peter M Abadir Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: C Barrett Bowling; Luqin Deng; Swati Sakhuja; Miriam C Morey; Byron C Jaeger; Paul Muntner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Azizah J Jor'dan; Victoria N Poole; Ikechukwu Iloputaife; William Milberg; Brad Manor; Michael Esterman; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 6.053