Literature DB >> 18334689

Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial.

Laura P Svetkey1, Victor J Stevens, Phillip J Brantley, Lawrence J Appel, Jack F Hollis, Catherine M Loria, William M Vollmer, Christina M Gullion, Kristine Funk, Patti Smith, Carmen Samuel-Hodge, Valerie Myers, Lillian F Lien, Daniel Laferriere, Betty Kennedy, Gerald J Jerome, Fran Heinith, David W Harsha, Pamela Evans, Thomas P Erlinger, Arline T Dalcin, Janelle Coughlin, Jeanne Charleston, Catherine M Champagne, Alan Bauck, Jamy D Ard, Kathleen Aicher.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Behavioral weight loss interventions achieve short-term success, but re-gain is common.
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 weight loss maintenance interventions with a self-directed control group. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two-phase trial in which 1032 overweight or obese adults (38% African American, 63% women) with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or both who had lost at least 4 kg during a 6-month weight loss program (phase 1) were randomized to a weight-loss maintenance intervention (phase 2). Enrollment at 4 academic centers occurred August 2003-July 2004 and randomization, February-December 2004. Data collection was completed in June 2007.
INTERVENTIONS: After the phase 1 weight-loss program, participants were randomized to one of the following groups for 30 months: monthly personal contact, unlimited access to an interactive technology-based intervention, or self-directed control. Main Outcome Changes in weight from randomization.
RESULTS: Mean entry weight was 96.7 kg. During the initial 6-month program, mean weight loss was 8.5 kg. After randomization, weight regain occurred. Participants in the personal-contact group regained less weight (4.0 kg) than those in the self-directed group (5.5 kg; mean difference at 30 months, -1.5 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.4 to -0.6 kg; P = .001). At 30 months, weight regain did not differ between the interactive technology-based (5.2 kg) and self-directed groups (5.5 kg; mean difference -0.3 kg; 95% CI, -1.2 to 0.6 kg; P = .51); however, weight regain was lower in the interactive technology-based than in the self-directed group at 18 months (mean difference, -1.1 kg; 95% CI, -1.9 to -0.4 kg; P = .003) and at 24 months (mean difference, -0.9 kg; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.02 kg; P = .04). At 30 months, the difference between the personal-contact and interactive technology-based group was -1.2 kg (95% CI -2.1 to -0.3; P = .008). Effects did not differ significantly by sex, race, age, and body mass index subgroups. Overall, 71% of study participants remained below entry weight.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of individuals who successfully completed an initial behavioral weight loss program maintained a weight below their initial level. Monthly brief personal contact provided modest benefit in sustaining weight loss, whereas an interactive technology-based intervention provided early but transient benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00054925.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18334689     DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.10.1139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  307 in total

1.  Screening, referral, and participation in a weight management program implemented in five CHCs.

Authors:  Daniel Clark; Lisa Chrysler; Anthony Perkins; Nicole R Keith; Deanna R Willis; Greg Abernathy; Faye Smith
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-05

Review 2.  Managing medical and surgical disorders after divided Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Bikram Bal; Timothy R Koch; Frederick C Finelli; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components.

Authors:  Anna Khaylis; Themis Yiaslas; Jessica Bergstrom; Cheryl Gore-Felton
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 4.  [Psychotherapy and obesity: strategies, challenges and possibilities].

Authors:  M Teufel; S Becker; N Rieber; K Stephan; S Zipfel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Family functioning and weight loss in a sample of african americans and whites.

Authors:  Carmen D Samuel-Hodge; Ziya Gizlice; Jianwen Cai; Phillip J Brantley; Jamy D Ard; Laura P Svetkey
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-12

6.  The Latino Health Project: pilot testing a culturally adapted behavioral weight loss intervention in obese and overweight Latino adults.

Authors:  Leonor Corsino; María Pilar Rocha-Goldberg; Bryan C Batch; David I Ortiz-Melo; Hayden B Bosworth; Laura P Svetkey
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 7.  Overweight and Obesity: Prevalence, Consequences, and Causes of a Growing Public Health Problem.

Authors:  Ellen P Williams; Marie Mesidor; Karen Winters; Patricia M Dubbert; Sharon B Wyatt
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-09

8.  Prevalence of undiagnosed and inadequately treated type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in morbidly obese patients who present for bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Mostaedi; Denise E Lackey; Sean H Adams; Stephen A Dada; Zahid A Hoda; Mohamed R Ali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Focus on emerging drugs for the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Alessandro Federico; Claudio Zulli; Ilario de Sio; Anna Del Prete; Marcello Dallio; Mario Masarone; Carmela Loguercio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Evaluating Mailed Motivational, Individually Tailored Postcard Boosters for Promoting Girls' Postintervention Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity.

Authors:  Marion Bakhoya; Jiying Ling; Karin A Pfeiffer; Lorraine B Robbins
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.