Literature DB >> 30801276

Do Changes in Pelvic Rotation and Tilt Affect Measurement of the Anterior Center Edge Angle on False Profile Radiographs? A Cadaveric Study.

Sara M Putnam1, John C Clohisy, Jeffrey J Nepple.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The false profile radiograph assesses acetabular coverage in prearthritic hip conditions. Precise rotation of this radiograph is difficult to obtain, so the clinician must interpret radiographs with nonstandard pelvic rotation or tilt, despite limited evidence of how this may affect the anterior center edge angle measurement. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does pelvic rotation alter the measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile views? (2) Does pelvic tilt alter the measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile views? (3) Is there an objective way to assess appropriate pelvic rotation for the false profile view?
METHODS: Eight cadaver hips (four female, four male; one hip randomly selected per pelvis) were included in the study. Hips with degenerative changes, evidence of previous fracture or trauma, or previous surgical intervention were excluded. Specimens were between 68 to 92 years of age (median, 76 years). The specimens were fixed to a custom jig, and radiographs were taken at 5° intervals of rotation (45-85°) and 5° intervals of pelvic tilt (+10° to -10°). The primary outcome variable, anterior center edge angle, was measured for each rotation and tilt.
RESULTS: Every degree increase in pelvic rotation toward a true lateral resulted in 0.18° increase in the anterior center edge angle (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.29; p = 0.002). For every degree increase in pelvic tilt, the anterior center edge angle increased 0.65° (95% CI, 0.5-0.8; p < 0.001). We verified that standard pelvic rotation of 65° for a false profile radiograph was present when the space between the femoral heads is 66% to 100% of the diameter of the femoral head being imaged.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the anterior center edge angle increases as pelvic tilt increases, with a 6° increase in anterior center edge angle for each 10° increase in pelvic tilt. Since the false profile radiograph is obtained standing, the patient should be counseled to avoid adopting a forced posture, ensuring the radiograph remains an accurate functional representation of the patient's anatomy. In contrast, pelvic rotation did not influence the anterior center edge angle by an important margin, and while we recommend that radiographs continue to be obtained with standardized pelvic rotation, aberrant pelvic rotation will likely not result in a clinically meaningful difference in anterior center edge angle measurements. In the future, studies to identify the specific regions of acetabular anatomy that constitute the radiographic measurement of the anterior center edge angle would enhance current understanding of the associated radiographic anatomy, and consequently improve the ability of the surgeon to treat the specific area of pathology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In practice, the clinician should pay close attention to pelvic tilt, as a 10° change in tilt may cause 6° of change in the anterior center edge angle. However, false profile radiographs obtained within ± 20° of the targeted 65° of rotation will result in less than 4° change in the anterior center edge angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30801276      PMCID: PMC6494305          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  Radiographic Identification of Arthroscopically Relevant Acetabular Structures.

Authors:  W Andrew Lee; Adriana J Saroki; Sverre Løken; Christiano A C Trindade; Tyler R Cram; Broc R Schindler; Robert F LaPrade; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures.

Authors:  Coen A Wijdicks; Chad J Griffith; Robert F LaPrade; Steinar Johansen; Adam Sunderland; Elizabeth A Arendt; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Radiographic identification of the primary posterolateral knee structures.

Authors:  Sean D Pietrini; Robert F LaPrade; Chad J Griffith; Coen A Wijdicks; Connor G Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The anterior center edge angle in Lequesne's false profile view: interrater correlation, dependence on pelvic tilt and correlation to anterior acetabular coverage in the sagital plane. A cadaver study.

Authors:  P O Zingg; C M L Werner; A Sukthankar; M Zanetti; B Seifert; C Dora
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  [False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies].

Authors:  M LEQUESNE
Journal:  Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic       Date:  1961-12

7.  Reliability of overcoverage parameters with varying morphologic pincer features: comparison of EOS® and radiography.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Mandar Agashe; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Evan R Knaus; Devyani M Hunt; John M Lesher; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Heidi Prather
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position. Contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip.

Authors:  M G Lequesne; J D Laredo
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted.

Authors:  Patrick L S Li; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The borderline dysplastic hip: when and how is it abnormal?

Authors:  Sarah D Bixby; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

2.  Medialization of the Hip's Center with Periacetabular Osteotomy: Validation of Assessment with Plain Radiographs.

Authors:  Lucas M Fowler; Jeffrey J Nepple; Clarabelle Devries; Michael D Harris; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effect of Patient Positioning on Measurement of the Anterior Center-Edge Angle on False-Profile Radiographs and Its 3-Dimensional Mapping to the Acetabular Rim.

Authors:  Joseph D Mozingo; Lindsay L Schuring; Alexander J Mortensen; Andrew E Anderson; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dynamic three-dimensional CT analysis in detection of cam and pincer type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Maarten A Röling; Nina M C Mathijssen; Rolf M Bloem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.