Literature DB >> 27752989

Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

Joel Wells1,2, Jeffrey J Nepple3, Karla Crook3, James R Ross4, Asheesh Bedi5, Perry Schoenecker3, John C Clohisy3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip dysplasia represents a spectrum of complex deformities on both sides of the joint. Although many studies have described the acetabular side of the deformity, to our knowledge, little is known about the three-dimensional (3-D) head and neck offset differences of the femora of dysplastic hips. A thorough knowledge of proximal femoral anatomy is important to prevent potential impingement and improve results after acetabular reorientation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are there common proximal femoral characteristics in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO)? (2) Where is the location of maximal femoral head and neck offset deformity in hip dysplasia? (3) Do certain subgroups of dysplastic hips more commonly have cam-type femoral morphology? (4) Is there a relationship between hip ROM as well as impingement testing and 3-D head and neck offset deformity?
METHODS: Using our hip preservation database, 153 hips (148 patients) underwent PAO from October 2013 to July 2015. We identified 103 hips in 100 patients with acetabular dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] < 20°) and who had a Tönnis grade of 0 or 1. Eighty-six patients (86%) underwent preoperative low-dose pelvic CT scans at our institution as part of the preoperative planning for PAO. It is currently our standard to obtain preoperative low-dose pelvic CT scans (0.75-1.25 mSv, equivalent to three to five AP pelvis radiographs) on all patients before they undergo PAO unless a prior CT scan is performed at an outside institution. Hips with a history of a neuromuscular disorder, prior trauma, prior surgery, radiographic evidence of joint degeneration, ischemic necrosis, or Perthes-like deformities were excluded. Fifty hips in 50 patients met inclusion criteria and had CT scans available for review. Hips were analyzed with Dyonics Plan software and characterized with regard to version, neck-shaft angle, femoral head diameter, head and neck offset, femoral neck length, femoral offset, head center height, trochanteric height, and alpha angle. The maximum head and neck offset deformity was assessed using an entire clockface and an alpha angle ≥ 55° defined coexisting cam morphology. Subgroups included severity of lateral dysplasia: mild (LCEA 15°-20°) and moderate/severe (LCEA < 15°). Femoral version subgroups were defined as normal (5°-20°), decreased (≤ 5°), or increased (> 20°). The senior author (JCC) performed all physical examination testing.
RESULTS: The mean LCEA was 14° (±4°), whereas the mean femoral anteversion was 19° (±12°). Eight hips (16%) demonstrated relative femoral retroversion (≤ 5°), whereas 26 (52%) showed excessive femoral anteversion (> 20°). Four hips (8%) had ≥ 35° of femoral anteversion. The mean neck-shaft angle was 136° (±5°). The mean maximum alpha location was 2:00 o'clock (±45 minutes) and the mean maximum alpha angle was 52° (±6°). Minimum head-neck offset ratio was located at 1:30 with a mean of 0.14 (±0.03). An anterior head-neck offset ratio of ≤ 0.17 or an alpha angle ≥ 55° was found in 43 (86%) of hips. Twenty-one dysplastic hips (42%) had an alpha angle ≥ 55°. Mildly dysplastic hips had decreased femoral head and neck offset (9 ± 1) and head and neck offset ratio (0.20 ± 0.03) at 12 o'clock compared with moderate/severe dysplastic hips (10 ± 1 and 0.22 ± 0.03, respectively; p = 0.04 and p = 0.01). With the numbers available, we found that hips with excessive femoral anteversion (> 20°) had no difference in the alpha angle at 3 o'clock (42 ± 7) compared with hips with relative femoral retroversion (≤ 5°; 48 ± 4; p = 0.06). No other differences in femoral morphology were found between hips with mild or moderate/severe dysplasia or in the femoral version subgroups with the numbers available. Anterior impingement test was positive in 76% of hips with an alpha angle ≥ 55° and 83% of the hips with an alpha angle ≤ 55°. No correlation was found between proximal femoral morphology and preoperative ROM.
CONCLUSIONS: In this subset of dysplastic hips, cam deformity of the femoral head and neck was present in 42% of hips with maximal head-neck deformity at 2 o'clock, and 82% had reduced head-neck offset at the 1:30 point. We conclude that cam-type deformities and decreased head-neck offset in developmental dysplasia of the hip are common. Patients should be closely assessed for need of a head and neck osteochondroplasty, especially after acetabular correction. Future prospective studies should evaluate the influence of proximal femoral anatomy on surgical results of PAO for dysplastic hips. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27752989      PMCID: PMC5339134          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  42 in total

1.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Does surgical hip dislocation and periacetabular osteotomy improve pain in patients with Perthes-like deformities and acetabular dysplasia?

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple; James R Ross; Gail Pashos; Perry L Schoenecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Pelvic deformity influences acetabular version and coverage in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Masanori Fujii; Yasuharu Nakashima; Taishi Sato; Mio Akiyama; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J F Crowe; V J Mani; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Bryan T Kelly; J W Thomas Byrd; Jérôme Tonetti; Stephane Lavallee; Laurence Chabanas; Guillaume Barrier; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  K Klaue; C W Durnin; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-05

8.  Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?

Authors:  Joel Wells; Michael Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Evgeny Bulat; Patricia Miller; Travis Matheney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities.

Authors:  Doris E Wenger; Kurtis R Kendell; Mark R Miner; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric; J K Salama; T Ochi; H S Tullos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-07
View more
  41 in total

1.  Editorial Comment: The Bernese Hip Symposium and CORR®-Sharing the Latest and Best in Hip Surgery Research.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Armando Torres-Gomez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Travis J Hillen; Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Muscle-tendon-related abnormalities detected by ultrasonography are common in symptomatic hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Julie Sandell Jacobsen; Lars Bolvig; Per Hölmich; Kristian Thorborg; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Søballe; Inger Mechlenburg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.

Authors:  Klemen Stražar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Is There an Association Between Borderline-to-mild Dysplasia and Hip Osteoarthritis? Analysis of CT Osteoabsorptiometry.

Authors:  Tohru Irie; Daisuke Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Asano; Ryuta Arai; Muhammad Alaa Terkawi; Yoichi M Ito; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does 3DMR provide equivalent information as 3DCT for the pre-operative evaluation of adult Hip pain conditions of femoroacetabular impingement and Hip dysplasia?

Authors:  Kevin Yan; Yin Xi; Chayanit Sasiponganan; Joseph Zerr; Joel E Wells; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Increased femoral antetorsion correlates with higher degrees of lateral retropatellar cartilage degeneration, further accentuated in genu valgum.

Authors:  A Flury; A Hoch; O Andronic; B Fritz; F B Imhoff; S F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Medialization of the Hip's Center with Periacetabular Osteotomy: Validation of Assessment with Plain Radiographs.

Authors:  Lucas M Fowler; Jeffrey J Nepple; Clarabelle Devries; Michael D Harris; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  MRI-based synthetic CT of the hip: can it be an alternative to conventional CT in the evaluation of osseous morphology?

Authors:  Lieve Morbée; Min Chen; Thomas Van Den Berghe; Eva Schiettecatte; Robert Gosselin; Nele Herregods; Lennart B O Jans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.