Literature DB >> 23361933

Novel CT-based three-dimensional software improves the characterization of cam morphology.

Michael T Milone1, Asheesh Bedi, Lazaros Poultsides, Erin Magennis, J W Thomas Byrd, Christopher M Larson, Bryan T Kelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incomplete correction of femoral offset and sphericity remains the leading cause for revision surgery for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Because arthroscopic exploration is technically difficult, a detailed preoperative understanding of morphology is of paramount importance for preoperative decision-making. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to (1) characterize the size and location of peak cam deformity with a prototype CT-based software program; (2) compare software alpha angles with those obtained by plain radiograph and CT images; and (3) assess whether differences can be explained by variable measurement locations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative plain radiographs and CT scans of 100 symptomatic cam lesions treated by arthroscopy; recorded alpha angle and clockface measurement location with a novel prototype CT-based software program, CT, and Dunn lateral plain radiographs; and used ordinary least squares regressions to assess the relationship between alpha angle and measurement location.
RESULTS: The software determined a mean alpha angle of 70.8° at 1:23 o'clock and identified 60% of maximum alpha angles between 12:45 and 1:45. The CT and plain radiographs underestimated by 5.7° and 8.2°, respectively. The software-based location was anterosuperior to the mean CT and plain radiograph measurement locations by 41 and 97 minutes, respectively. Regression analysis confirmed a correlation between alpha angle differences and variable measurement locations.
CONCLUSIONS: Software-based three-dimensional (3-D) imaging generated alpha angles larger than those found by plain radiograph and CT, and these differences were the result of location of measurement. An automated 3-D assessment that accurately describes the location and topography of FAI may be needed to adequately characterize preoperative deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361933      PMCID: PMC3705074          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2809-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Carlos A Guanche; Aaron A Bare
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

5.  Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; M Russell Giveans
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  Efficacy of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Naveen Arora; Thomas M Best; Xueliang Pan; Thomas J Ellis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Purnajyoti Banerjee; Christopher R McLean
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-03-16

8.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Is the frog lateral plain radiograph a reliable predictor of the alpha angle in femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  S Konan; F Rayan; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-01

Review 10.  The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Neal Chen; William Robertson; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  30 in total

1.  Combining femoral and acetabular parameters in femoroacetabular impingement: the omega surface.

Authors:  Heinse Bouma; Tom Hogervorst; Emanuel Audenaert; Paulien van Kampen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Current concepts and trends for operative treatment of FAI: hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; Rebecca M Stone
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

3.  Symposium: Advanced hip arthroscopy: editorial comment.

Authors:  Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoroacetabular impingement with chronic acetabular rim fracture - 3D computed tomography, 3D magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Shaun Nordeck; Vibhor Wadhwa; Sai Madhavapeddi; William J Robertson
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

5.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Armando Torres-Gomez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Functional acetabular orientation varies between supine and standing radiographs: implications for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  James R Ross; Eric P Tannenbaum; Jeffrey J Nepple; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  CT false-profile view of the hip: a reproducible method of measuring anterior acetabular coverage using volume CT data.

Authors:  Steven D Needell; Ross M Borzykowski; Dominic S Carreira; John Kozy
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Clinical and morphologic factors associated with suture anchor refixation of labral tears in the hip.

Authors:  John A Ruder; Erin Magennis; Anil S Ranawat; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-12-03

9.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

Authors:  Joel Wells; Jeffrey J Nepple; Karla Crook; James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.