Literature DB >> 23639660

Advances in monitoring and management of shock.

Haifa Mtaweh1, Erin V Trakas, Erik Su, Joseph A Carcillo, Rajesh K Aneja.   

Abstract

Early recognition and treatment of pediatric shock, regardless of cause, decreases mortality and improves outcome. In addition to the conventional parameters (eg, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, urine output, and central venous pressure), biomarkers and noninvasive methods of measuring cardiac output are available to monitor and treat shock. This article emphasizes how fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of shock resuscitation, although the choice and amount of fluid may vary based on the cause of shock. Other emerging treatments for shock (ie, temperature control, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/ventricular assist devices) are also discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23639660      PMCID: PMC3644114          DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am        ISSN: 0031-3955            Impact factor:   3.278


  75 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Ferritin levels in children with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia; Fernanda Longhi; Ricardo Garcia Branco; Jefferson Pedro Piva; Dani Lacks; Robert Charles Tasker
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  Cardiac output in newborn infants with transient myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  F J Walther; B Siassi; N A Ramadan; P Y Wu
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Comparison between procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for early diagnosis of children with sepsis or septic shock.

Authors:  José R Fioretto; Joelma G Martin; Cilmery S Kurokawa; Mário F Carpi; Rossano C Bonatto; Marcos A de Moraes; Sandra M Q Ricchetti
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.575

5.  Vasopressin in pediatric vasodilatory shock: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen Choong; Desmond Bohn; Douglas D Fraser; Isabelle Gaboury; James S Hutchison; Ari R Joffe; Catherine Litalien; Kusum Menon; Patrick McNamara; Roxanne E Ward
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Hemodynamic support in fluid-refractory pediatric septic shock.

Authors:  G Ceneviva; J A Paschall; F Maffei; J A Carcillo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Sequential cardiopulmonary variables of infants and children in septic shock.

Authors:  M M Pollack; A I Fields; U E Ruttimann
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  ACCM/PALS haemodynamic support guidelines for paediatric septic shock: an outcomes comparison with and without monitoring central venous oxygen saturation.

Authors:  Cláudio F de Oliveira; Débora S F de Oliveira; Adriana F C Gottschald; Juliana D G Moura; Graziela A Costa; Andréa C Ventura; José Carlos Fernandes; Flávio A C Vaz; Joseph A Carcillo; Emanuel P Rivers; Eduardo J Troster
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department.

Authors:  David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen; Roger A Band; Jesse M Pines; Richard Massone; Frances F Furia; Frances S Shofer; Munish Goyal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Serum lactate levels as the predictor of outcome in pediatric septic shock.

Authors:  Kana Ram Jat; Urmila Jhamb; Vinod K Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Heart rate variability analysis is more sensitive at identifying neonatal sepsis than conventional vital signs.

Authors:  Fredrick J Bohanon; Amy A Mrazek; Mohamed T Shabana; Sarah Mims; Geetha L Radhakrishnan; George C Kramer; Ravi S Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Resuscitation with centhaquin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 improves survival in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock: a randomized experimental study.

Authors:  Zinais Kontouli; Chryssoula Staikou; Nicoletta Iacovidou; Ioannis Mamais; Evaggelia Kouskouni; Apostolos Papalois; Panagiotis Papapanagiotou; Anil Gulati; Athanasios Chalkias; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.