OBJECTIVE: Over the past 2 decades, colleges and universities have seen a large increase in the number of students referred to the administration for alcohol policies violations. However, a substantial portion of mandated students may not require extensive treatment. Stepped care may maximize treatment efficiency and greatly reduce the demands on campus alcohol programs. METHOD: Participants in the study (N = 598) were college studentsmandated to attend an alcohol program following a campus-based alcohol citation. All participants received Step 1: a 15-min brief advice session that included the provision of a booklet containing advice to reduce drinking. Participants were assessed 6 weeks after receiving the brief advice, and those who continued to exhibit risky alcohol use (n = 405) were randomized to Step 2, a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (n = 211), or an assessment-only control (n = 194). Follow-up assessments were conducted 3, 6, and 9 months after Step 2. RESULTS: Results indicated that the participants who received a brief motivational intervention showed a significantly reduced number of alcohol-related problems compared to those who received assessment only, despite no significant group differences in alcohol use. In addition, low-risk drinkers (n = 102; who reported low alcohol use and related harms at 6-week follow-up and were not randomized to stepped care) showed a stable alcohol use pattern throughout the follow-up period, indicating they required no additional intervention. CONCLUSION: Stepped care is an efficient and cost-effective method to reduce harms associated with alcohol use by mandated students.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Over the past 2 decades, colleges and universities have seen a large increase in the number of students referred to the administration for alcohol policies violations. However, a substantial portion of mandated students may not require extensive treatment. Stepped care may maximize treatment efficiency and greatly reduce the demands on campus alcohol programs. METHOD:Participants in the study (N = 598) were college students mandated to attend an alcohol program following a campus-based alcohol citation. All participants received Step 1: a 15-min brief advice session that included the provision of a booklet containing advice to reduce drinking. Participants were assessed 6 weeks after receiving the brief advice, and those who continued to exhibit risky alcohol use (n = 405) were randomized to Step 2, a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (n = 211), or an assessment-only control (n = 194). Follow-up assessments were conducted 3, 6, and 9 months after Step 2. RESULTS: Results indicated that the participants who received a brief motivational intervention showed a significantly reduced number of alcohol-related problems compared to those who received assessment only, despite no significant group differences in alcohol use. In addition, low-risk drinkers (n = 102; who reported low alcohol use and related harms at 6-week follow-up and were not randomized to stepped care) showed a stable alcohol use pattern throughout the follow-up period, indicating they required no additional intervention. CONCLUSION: Stepped care is an efficient and cost-effective method to reduce harms associated with alcohol use by mandated students.
Authors: John S Baer; Samuel A Ball; Barbara K Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Eugene P Schoener; Kathlene Tracy Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Nancy P Barnett; Brian Borsari; John T P Hustad; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Suzanne M Colby; Christopher W Kahler; Peter M Monti Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 1998-08
Authors: Christopher W Kahler; John Hustad; Nancy P Barnett; David R Strong; Brian Borsari Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Megan E Patrick; Jeffrey A Boatman; Nicole Morrell; Anna C Wagner; Grace R Lyden; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Cheryl A King; Erin E Bonar; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer; David M Vock; Daniel Almirall Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Diane E Logan; Melissa A Lewis; Nadine R Mastroleo; Jason R Kilmer; Mary E Larimer Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Ali M Yurasek; Nadine R Mastroleo; Brian Borsari Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Kate B Carey; Sara G Balestrieri; Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Angelo M DiBello; Madeline B Benz Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Alison Salloum; John Robst; Michael S Scheeringa; Judith A Cohen; Wei Wang; Tanya K Murphy; David F Tolin; Eric A Storch Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2014-02