Literature DB >> 19170455

Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.

Kate B Carey1, James M Henson, Michael P Carey, Stephen A Maisto.   

Abstract

In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention (BMI) and a computerized program for reducing drinking and related problems among college students sanctioned for alcohol violations. Referred students (N = 198, 46% women), stratified by gender, were randomly assigned to a BMI or to the Alcohol 101 Plus computer program. Data obtained at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months were used to evaluate intervention efficacy. Planned analyses revealed 3 primary findings. First, women who received the BMI reduced drinking more than did women who received the computer intervention; in contrast, men's drinking reductions did not differ by condition. Second, readiness to change and hazardous drinking status predicted drinking reductions at 1 month postintervention, regardless of intervention. Third, by 1 year, drinking returned to presanction (baseline) levels, with no differences in recidivism between groups. Exploratory analyses revealed an overall mean reduction in drinking immediately after the sanction event and before taking part in an intervention. Furthermore, after the self-initiated reductions prompted by the sanction were accounted for, participation in the BMI but not the computer intervention was found to produce additional reduction in drinking and related consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170455      PMCID: PMC2657221          DOI: 10.1037/a0014281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  33 in total

1.  Heavy drinking and alcohol policy enforcement in a statewide public college system.

Authors:  John R Knight; Sion Kim Harris; Lon Sherritt; Kathleen Kelley; Shari Van Hook; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Up close and personal: temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year.

Authors:  Frances K Del Boca; Jack Darkes; Paul E Greenbaum; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-04

3.  Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers.

Authors:  S Rollnick; N Heather; R Gold; W Hall
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1992-05

Review 4.  Computer-based interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Jennifer C Elliott; Kate B Carey; Jamie R Bolles
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.

Authors:  H R White; E W Labouvie
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1989-01

6.  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol.

Authors:  R L Collins; G A Parks; G A Marlatt
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-04

7.  Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research.

Authors:  D B Matthews; W R Miller
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Evaluation of alcohol education programs on attitude, knowledge, and self-reported behavior of college students.

Authors:  L Sharmer
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Trisha A Benson; Rudy E Vuchinich; Mary M Deskins; David Eakin; Amanda M Flood; Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy; Ohiana Torrealday
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-03

10.  Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students.

Authors:  Nancy P Barnett; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Kim Fromme; Brian Borsari; Kate B Carey; William R Corbin; Suzanne M Colby; Peter M Monti
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  64 in total

1.  The impact of defensiveness and incident reactions on post-sanction drinking behaviors among mandated students.

Authors:  Diane E Logan; Melissa A Lewis; Nadine R Mastroleo; Jason R Kilmer; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Randomized controlled trial of brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students for heavy-drinking mandated and volunteer undergraduates: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Meredith A Terlecki; Julia D Buckner; Mary E Larimer; Amy L Copeland
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-03

3.  Predictors of motivation to change in mandated college students following a referral incident.

Authors:  David Qi; Matthew R Pearson; John T P Hustad
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-04-21

Review 4.  Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Lorra Garey; Jennifer C Elliott; Michael P Carey
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-04-21

5.  Trajectories of in-session change language in brief motivational interventions with mandated college students.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Timothy R Apodaca; Kristina M Jackson; Anne Fernandez; Nadine R Mastroleo; Molly Magill; Nancy P Barnett; Kate B Carey
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-11-27

6.  The malleability of injunctive norms among college students.

Authors:  Mark A Prince; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Development of a face-to-face injunctive norms brief motivational intervention for college drinkers and preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Mark A Prince; Stephen A Maisto; Samara L Rice; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-10-19

Review 8.  New research findings since the 2007 Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking: a review.

Authors:  Ralph Hingson; Aaron White
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  A computer-based feedback only intervention with and without a moderation skills component.

Authors:  Cameron C Weaver; Thad R Leffingwell; Nathaniel J Lombardi; Kasey R Claborn; Mary E Miller; Matthew P Martens
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-09-14

10.  Alcohol interventions for mandated students: behavioral outcomes from a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Diane E Logan; Jason R Kilmer; Kevin M King; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.