Literature DB >> 22915122

Neural evidence for distracter suppression during visual search in real-world scenes.

Katharina N Seidl1, Marius V Peelen, Sabine Kastner.   

Abstract

Selecting visual information from cluttered real-world scenes involves the matching of visual input to the observer's attentional set--an internal representation of objects that are relevant for current behavioral goals. When goals change, a new attentional set needs to be instantiated, requiring the suppression of the previous set to prevent distraction by objects that are no longer relevant. In the present fMRI study, we investigated how such suppression is implemented at the neural level. We measured human brain activity in response to natural scene photographs that could contain objects from (1) a currently relevant (target) category, (2) a previously but not presently relevant (distracter) category, and/or (3) a never relevant (neutral) category. Across conditions, multivoxel response patterns in object-selective cortex carried information about objects present in the scenes. However, this information strongly depended on the task relevance of the objects. As expected, information about the target category was significantly increased relative to the neutral category, indicating top-down enhancement of task-relevant information. Importantly, information about the distracter category was significantly reduced relative to the neutral category, indicating that the processing of previously relevant objects was suppressed. Such active suppression at the level of high-order visual cortex may serve to prevent the erroneous selection of, or interference from, objects that are no longer relevant to ongoing behavior. We conclude that the enhancement of relevant information and the suppression of distracting information both contribute to the efficient selection of visual information from cluttered real-world scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22915122      PMCID: PMC3443854          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1693-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.

Authors:  K M O'Craven; P E Downing; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation.

Authors:  S Kastner; M A Pinsk; P De Weerd; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Narcisse P Bichot; Andrew F Rossi; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Top-down enhancement and suppression of the magnitude and speed of neural activity.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jeffrey W Cooney; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries; Partha P Mitra; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

Review 7.  The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

9.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  30 in total

1.  Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  A connectionist modeling study of the neural mechanisms underlying pain's ability to reorient attention.

Authors:  Robert Dowman; Benjamin Ritz; Kathleen Fowler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Automatic guidance of attention during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Katharina N Seidl-Rathkopf; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The Human Intraparietal Sulcus Modulates Task-Evoked Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Kai Hwang; James M Shine; Dillan Cellier; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of selective representation of visual working memory in ventral temporal and occipital regions.

Authors:  Xufeng Han; Alexander C Berg; Hwamee Oh; Dimitris Samaras; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Whole person-evoked fMRI activity patterns in human fusiform gyrus are accurately modeled by a linear combination of face- and body-evoked activity patterns.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Lukas Strnad; Katharina N Seidl; Sabine Kastner; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Elise Demeter; Kenneth C Roberts; Leonardo Chelazzi; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.