Literature DB >> 26791226

Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.

Francesco Marini1, Elise Demeter2, Kenneth C Roberts2, Leonardo Chelazzi3, Marty G Woldorff4.   

Abstract

Given the information overload often imparted to human cognitive-processing systems, suppression of irrelevant and distracting information is essential for successful behavior. Using a hybrid block/event-related fMRI design, we characterized proactive and reactive brain mechanisms for filtering distracting stimuli. Participants performed a flanker task, discriminating the direction of a target arrow in the presence versus absence of congruent or incongruent flanking distracting arrows during either Pure blocks (distracters always absent) or Mixed blocks (distracters on 80% of trials). Each Mixed block had either 20% or 60% incongruent trials. Activations in the dorsal frontoparietal attention network during Mixed versus Pure blocks evidenced proactive (blockwise) recruitment of a distraction-filtering mechanism. Sustained activations in right middle frontal gyrus during 60% Incongruent blocks correlated positively with behavioral indices of distraction-filtering (slowing when distracters might occur) and negatively with distraction-related behavioral costs (incongruent vs congruent trials), suggesting a role in coordinating proactive filtering of potential distracters. Event-related analyses showed that incongruent trials elicited greater reactive activations in 20% (vs 60%) Incongruent blocks for counteracting distraction and conflict, including in the insula and anterior cingulate. Context-related effects in occipitoparietal cortex consisted of greater target-evoked activations for distracter-absent trials (central-target-only) in Mixed versus Pure blocks, suggesting enhanced attentional engagement. Functional-localizer analyses in V1/V2/V3 revealed less distracter-processing activity in 60% (vs 20%) Incongruent blocks, presumably reflecting tonic suppression by proactive filtering mechanisms. These results delineate brain mechanisms underlying proactive and reactive filtering of distraction and conflict, and how they are orchestrated depending on distraction probability, thereby aiding task performance. Significance statement: Irrelevant stimuli distract people and impair their attentional performance. Here, we studied how the brain deals with distracting stimuli using a hybrid block/event-related fMRI design and a task that varied the probability of the occurrence of such distracting stimuli. The results suggest that when distraction is likely, a region in right frontal cortex proactively implements attentional control mechanisms to help filter out any distracting stimuli that might occur. In contrast, when distracting input occurs infrequently, this region is more reactively engaged to help limit the negative consequences of the distracters on behavioral performance. Our results thus help illuminate how the brain flexibly responds under differing attentional demands to engender effective behavior.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/360988-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; cognitive control; distraction filtering; flanker task; mixed-design fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791226      PMCID: PMC4719027          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2966-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  66 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Nicholas E Diquattro
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Francis M Miezin; James E Kelly; Randy L Buckner; David I Donaldson; Mark P McAvoy; Vidya M Bhalodia; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex.

Authors:  G L Shulman; M Corbetta; R L Buckner; M E Raichle; J A Fiez; F M Miezin; S E Petersen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Challenges to attention: a continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) study of the effects of distraction on sustained attention.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Attentional preparation for a lateralized visual distractor: behavioral and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Christian C Ruff; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; David Dignath; Marco Steinhauser; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Verbal and Nonverbal Anticipatory Mechanisms in Bilinguals.

Authors:  Lorenzo Desideri; Paola Bonifacci
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

4.  Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effects of ongoing distraction on the neural processes underlying signal detection.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Daniela De Alburquerque; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Mary Kosoyan; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Prefrontal Control of Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms of Visual Suppression.

Authors:  Fabio Di Bello; Sameh Ben Hadj Hassen; Elaine Astrand; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.

Authors:  Jiachen Lu; Lili Tian; Jiafeng Zhang; Jing Wang; Chaoxiong Ye; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes.

Authors:  Valeria Di Caro; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.