Maya Sabatello1,2, Ying Chen3, Carmen Fiorella Herrera4, Erika Brockhoff5, Jehannine Austin6, Paul S Appelbaum7. 1. Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA, ms4075@columbia.edu. 2. Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA, ms4075@columbia.edu. 3. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA. 4. Yale New Haven Health - Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA. 5. Mount Sinai West, New York, New York, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry and Medical genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Precision medicine raises hope for translating genetic-based knowledge about psychiatric risks into mental health benefits by motivating health-related, risk-reducing behaviors. Teenagers (ages 14-17) are an important age-group to engage in preventive efforts but, their views about psychiatric genetics are understudied. METHOD: An online survey with a nationally representative sample of teenagers (n = 417) was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 handouts, 1 emphasizing the genetic underpinnings of psychiatric conditions; the other agency-oriented and focusing on gene-environment interactions. Survey questions queried their views about behavioral changes in response to psychiatric genetic risk information and expressed willingness to undertake them. Participants' decision-making characteristics (i.e., self-efficacy, empowerment, intolerance of uncertainty, and sensation-seeking) were assessed at baseline. RESULTS: Teenagers strongly valued the information provided and its potential usefulness for their mental health. Information about psychiatric genetics alone impacted views about the causes of mental illness. Contrary to our hypothesis, the type of handout did not impact participants' expressed willingness to make behavioral changes to reduce their risk of developing a psychiatric condition, but their sense of empowerment played a key role in their responses. CONCLUSION: Educating teenagers about gene-environment interactions may help facilitate the translational efforts of precision psychiatry. Research with teenagers across racial/ethnic groups, especially those with family histories, is needed to better understand the factors that impact teenagers' empowerment in psychiatric genomic settings and to identify measures, including the best enablers of empowerment (e.g., educators, parents), which would allow them to reap the benefits of precision psychiatry.
OBJECTIVE: Precision medicine raises hope for translating genetic-based knowledge about psychiatric risks into mental health benefits by motivating health-related, risk-reducing behaviors. Teenagers (ages 14-17) are an important age-group to engage in preventive efforts but, their views about psychiatric genetics are understudied. METHOD: An online survey with a nationally representative sample of teenagers (n = 417) was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 handouts, 1 emphasizing the genetic underpinnings of psychiatric conditions; the other agency-oriented and focusing on gene-environment interactions. Survey questions queried their views about behavioral changes in response to psychiatric genetic risk information and expressed willingness to undertake them. Participants' decision-making characteristics (i.e., self-efficacy, empowerment, intolerance of uncertainty, and sensation-seeking) were assessed at baseline. RESULTS: Teenagers strongly valued the information provided and its potential usefulness for their mental health. Information about psychiatric genetics alone impacted views about the causes of mental illness. Contrary to our hypothesis, the type of handout did not impact participants' expressed willingness to make behavioral changes to reduce their risk of developing a psychiatric condition, but their sense of empowerment played a key role in their responses. CONCLUSION: Educating teenagers about gene-environment interactions may help facilitate the translational efforts of precision psychiatry. Research with teenagers across racial/ethnic groups, especially those with family histories, is needed to better understand the factors that impact teenagers' empowerment in psychiatric genomic settings and to identify measures, including the best enablers of empowerment (e.g., educators, parents), which would allow them to reap the benefits of precision psychiatry.
Authors: Neeltje E Blankenstein; Eveline A Crone; Wouter van den Bos; Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Erin E Michalak; Melinda J Suto; Steven J Barnes; Sharon Hou; Sara Lapsley; Mike W Scott; Greg Murray; Jehannine Austin; Nusha Balram Elliott; Lesley Berk Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Nina Simonsen; Anna Lahti; Sakari Suominen; Raili Välimaa; Jorma Tynjälä; Eva Roos; Lasse Kannas Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Patrick F Sullivan; Arpana Agrawal; Cynthia M Bulik; Ole A Andreassen; Anders D Børglum; Gerome Breen; Sven Cichon; Howard J Edenberg; Stephen V Faraone; Joel Gelernter; Carol A Mathews; Caroline M Nievergelt; Jordan W Smoller; Michael C O'Donovan Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 18.112