Literature DB >> 29380189

Respiratory changes in subclavian vein diameters predicts fluid responsiveness in intensive care patients: a pilot study.

Raphaël Giraud1,2,3, Paul S Abraham4,5, Pauline Brindel6, Nils Siegenthaler1,2,3, Karim Bendjelid1,2,3.   

Abstract

The present pilot study investigated whether respiratory variation in subclavian vein (SCV) diameters correlates with fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Monocentric, prospective clinical study on fluid responsiveness in adult sedated, mechanically ventilated ICU patient, monitored with the PiCCO™ system (Pulsion Medical System, Germany), and requiring a fluid challenge (FC). A 10-min fluid bolus of 500 mL of 0.9% saline was administered. Cardiac output (CO) and dynamic parameters [stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV)] measured by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis (PiCCO™) as well as classical hemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline and after FC. Fluid responsiveness was described as an increase in CO of ≥ 15%. Ultrasound measurements obtained in the subclavian long-axis view were used to calculate the SCVvariability index. A cut-off value for SCV variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness was determined using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Nine of 20 FCs (45%) induced an increase in CO of ≥ 15%. At baseline, the SCVvariability index was greater in responders than in non-responders (34.0 ± 21.4 vs. 9.0 ± 5.5; p = 0.0005). Diagnostic performance for the SCVvariability index revealed a cut-off value of 14 with a sensitivity of 100% [Confidence interval (CI) 95% (90; 100)] and a specificity of 82% [CI 95% (48; 98)] for the prediction of fluid responsiveness. Other parameters, such as SVV and PPV, could not predict fluid responsiveness. The correlation coefficient between CO variation and the SCVvariability index was 0.73 (p < 0.001). The SCVvariability index was a reliable, non-invasive parameter for the prediction of fluid responsiveness at the bedside of mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients in this pilot study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Echocardiography; Fluid responsiveness; Fluid therapy; Subclavian vein; Venous collapsibility index

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380189     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0103-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  18 in total

1.  Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  John H Boyd; Jason Forbes; Taka-aki Nakada; Keith R Walley; James A Russell
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Radial-femoral concordance in time and frequency domain-based estimates of systemic arterial respiratory variation.

Authors:  Robert H Thiele; Douglas A Colquhoun; Jason M Tucker-Schwartz; George T Gillies; Marcel E Durieux
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice.

Authors:  C W Stetz; R G Miller; G E Kelly; T A Raffin
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-12

4.  Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.

Authors:  David Osman; Christophe Ridel; Patrick Ray; Xavier Monnet; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients.

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Karim Chergui; Anne Rabiller; Olivier Peyrouset; Bernard Page; Alain Beauchet; François Jardin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Sonographic evaluation of intravascular volume status in the surgical intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of subclavian vein and inferior vena cava collapsibility index.

Authors:  Alistair Kent; David P Bahner; Creagh T Boulger; Daniel S Eiferman; Eric J Adkins; David C Evans; Andrew N Springer; Jayaraj M Balakrishnan; Sebastian Valiyaveedan; Sagar C Galwankar; Chinedu Njoku; David E Lindsey; Susan Yeager; Geoffrey J Roelant; Stanislaw P A Stawicki
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Extravascular lung water is an independent prognostic factor in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Serena Silva; Romain Persichini; Nadia Anguel; David Osman; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of contemporary data.

Authors:  Neil J Glassford; Glenn M Eastwood; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation.

Authors:  Thieme Souza Oliveira Nunes; Renata Teixeira Ladeira; Antônio Tonete Bafi; Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo; Flavia Ribeiro Machado; Flávio Geraldo Rezende Freitas
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Comparison of Respiratory Variations of Subclavian Vein and Inferior Vena Cava in Hospitalized Patients with Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Elaine M Kaptein; Alan Cantillep; John S Kaptein; Zayar Oo; Myint B Thu; Phyu Phyu Thwe; Matthew J Kaptein
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 3.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comparison of subclavian vein to inferior vena cava collapsibility by ultrasound in acute heart failure: A pilot study.

Authors:  Yvonne E Kaptein; Elaine M Kaptein
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Respiratory Variation in the Inferior Vena Cava, Subclavian Vein, Internal Jugular Vein, and Femoral Vein Diameter to Predict Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Do-Wan Kim; Seungwoo Chung; Wu-Seong Kang; Joongsuck Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.