Literature DB >> 22902538

Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.

Alexandros Kafkas1, Daniela Montaldi.   

Abstract

Two experiments explored eye measures (fixations and pupil response patterns) and brain responses (BOLD) accompanying the recognition of visual object stimuli based on familiarity and recollection. In both experiments, the use of a modified remember/know procedure led to high confidence and matched accuracy levels characterising strong familiarity (F3) and recollection (R) responses. In Experiment 1, visual scanning behaviour at retrieval distinguished familiarity-based from recollection-based recognition. Recollection, relative to strength-matched familiarity, involved significantly larger pupil dilations and more dispersed fixation patterns. In Experiment 2, the hippocampus was selectively activated for recollected stimuli, while no evidence of activation was observed in the hippocampus for strong familiarity of matched accuracy. Recollection also activated the parahippocampal cortex (PHC), while the adjacent perirhinal cortex (PRC) was actively engaged in response to strong familiarity (than to recollection). Activity in prefrontal and parietal areas differentiated familiarity and recollection in both the extent and the magnitude of activity they exhibited, while the dorsomedial thalamus showed selective familiarity-related activity, and the ventrolateral and anterior thalamus selective recollection-related activity. These findings are consistent with the view that the hippocampus and PRC play contrasting roles in supporting recollection and familiarity and that these differences are not a result of differences in memory strength. Overall, the combined pupil dilation, eye movement and fMRI data suggest the operation of recognition mechanisms drawing differentially on familiarity and recollection, whose neural bases are distinct within the MTL.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902538     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  38 in total

1.  The multiple neural networks of familiarity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies.

Authors:  Mathilde Horn; Renaud Jardri; Fabien D'Hondt; Guillaume Vaiva; Pierre Thomas; Delphine Pins
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Brain mechanisms of successful recognition through retrieval of semantic context.

Authors:  Kristin E Flegal; Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Looking for graded recollection: manipulating the number of details to be recollected does not affect recollection variance.

Authors:  Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

Review 4.  Eye movements in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert J Molitor; Philip C Ko; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 5.  A Closer Look at the Hippocampus and Memory.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Donna J Bridge; Neal J Cohen; John A Walker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; John M Henderson; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

7.  Retrieval Demands Adaptively Change Striatal Old/New Signals and Boost Subsequent Long-Term Memory.

Authors:  Nora A Herweg; Tobias Sommer; Nico Bunzeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Brain networks underlying episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Kaia L Vilberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Memory-related eye movements challenge behavioral measures of pattern completion and pattern separation.

Authors:  Robert J Molitor; Philip C Ko; Erin P Hussey; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Conscious and unconscious memory differentially impact attention: Eye movements, visual search, and recognition processes.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; Andrew P Yonelinas; John M Henderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.