Literature DB >> 26578525

The multiple neural networks of familiarity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies.

Mathilde Horn1,2, Renaud Jardri3,4, Fabien D'Hondt5, Guillaume Vaiva3,4, Pierre Thomas3,4, Delphine Pins3.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated the critical role of the feeling of familiarity in recognition memory. Various neuroimaging paradigms have been developed to identify the brain regions that sustain the processing of familiarity; however, there is still considerable controversy about the functional significance of each brain region implicated in familiarity-based retrieval. Here, we focused on the differences between paradigms that assess familiarity, with or without the encoding phase. We used the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) algorithm to conduct a whole-brain meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies that involved a familiarity task. Sixty-nine studies, performed in healthy subjects to determine the specific functions of the identified regions in familiarity processing, were finally selected. Distinct subanalyses were performed according to the experimental procedures used in the original studies. The ALE clusters that were highlighted revealed common activations for paradigms with and without encoding in the prefrontal cortex and in the parietal cortex. Additionally, supplementary activations related to specific familiarity (i.e., without the encoding phase) were observed in the limbic system (i.e., the amygdala, hippocampus, cingulate cortex, and insula) and in the associative sensory areas. The differences in the reported findings for different procedures are possibly due to differences in the concept of familiarity. To aid the exploration of the neural correlates of familiarity in future studies, the strengths and weaknesses of these experimental procedures are critically discussed.

Keywords:  Familiarity; Limbic system; Meta-analysis; Parietal cortex; Prefrontal cortex; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26578525     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0392-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  101 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Guinevere F Eden; Karen M Jones; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces.

Authors:  M Ida Gobbini; Ellen Leibenluft; Neil Santiago; James V Haxby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception.

Authors:  Scott L Fairhall; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces.

Authors:  M Ida Gobbini; James V Haxby
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Damage to the lateral prefrontal cortex impairs familiarity but not recollection.

Authors:  Mariam Aly; Andrew P Yonelinas; Mark M Kishiyama; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: naturally familiar brand logos are found faster.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Angela Qin; Wilma Koutstaal; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The influence of perceptual and knowledge-based familiarity on the neural substrates of face perception.

Authors:  Jasmin Cloutier; William M Kelley; Todd F Heatherton
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Mick Fox; Martin Wiener; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Visual personal familiarity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Luisa Jurjanz; Markus Donix; Eva C Amanatidis; Shirin Meyer; Katrin Poettrich; Thomas Huebner; Damaris Baeumler; Michael N Smolka; Vjera A Holthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effects of age on neural correlates of recognition memory: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Mingzhu Hou; Tracy H Wang; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.682

2.  Spatial Arrangement and Set Size Influence the Coding of Non-symbolic Quantities in the Intraparietal Sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Bloechle; Julia F Huber; Elise Klein; Julia Bahnmueller; Johannes Rennig; Korbinian Moeller; Stefan Huber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Differential Medial Temporal Lobe and Parietal Cortical Contributions to Real-world Autobiographical Episodic and Autobiographical Semantic Memory.

Authors:  Thackery I Brown; Jesse Rissman; Tiffany E Chow; Melina R Uncapher; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The posterior parietal cortex and subjectively perceived confidence during memory retrieval.

Authors:  Syanah C Wynn; Marc P H Hendriks; Sander M Daselaar; Roy P C Kessels; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  A model-guided dissociation between subcortical and cortical contributions to word recognition.

Authors:  Mario Braun; Martin Kronbichler; Fabio Richlan; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Brain networks underlying the processing of sound symbolism related to softness perception.

Authors:  Ryo Kitada; Jinhwan Kwon; Ryuichi Doizaki; Eri Nakagawa; Tsubasa Tanigawa; Hiroyuki Kajimoto; Norihiro Sadato; Maki Sakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.