Literature DB >> 22899312

Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion.

Olle Lagerquist1, Cameron S Mang, David F Collins.   

Abstract

Unilateral training involving voluntary contractions, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), or a combination of the two can increase the excitability of neural circuits bilaterally within the CNS. Many rehabilitation programs are designed to promote such "neuroplasticity" to improve voluntary movement following CNS damage. While much is known about this type of activity-dependent plasticity for the muscles that dorsi-flex the ankle, similar information is not available for the plantar-flexors. Presently, we assessed the excitability of corticospinal (CS) and spinal circuits for both soleus (SOL) muscles before and after voluntary contractions of the right plantar-flexors (VOL; 5 s on-5 s off, 40 min), NMES of the right tibial nerve (tnNMES; 5 s on-5 s off, 40 min), or both together (V + tnNMES). CS excitability for the right (rSOL) and left SOL (lSOL) muscles was assessed by quantifying motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Spinal excitability was assessed using measures from the ascending limb of the M-wave versus H-reflex recruitment curve. CS excitability did not change for rSOL (the activated muscle) or lSOL following any condition. In contrast, there was a marked increase in spinal excitability for rSOL, but only following V + tnNMES; the slope of the M-wave versus H-reflex recruitment curve increased approximately twofold (pre = 7.9; post = 16.2) and H-reflexes collected when the M-wave was ~5 % of the maximal M-wave (M(max)) increased by ~1.5× (pre = 19 % M(max), post = 29 % M(max)). Spinal excitability for lSOL did not change following any condition. Thus, only voluntary contractions that were coupled with NMES increased CNS excitability, and this occurred only in the ipsilateral spinal circuitry. These results are in marked contrast to previous studies showing NMES-induced changes in CS excitability for every other muscle studied and suggest that the mechanisms that regulate activity-dependent neuroplasticity are different for SOL than other muscles. Further, while rehabilitation strategies involving voluntary training and/or NMES of the plantar-flexors may be beneficial for producing movement and reducing atrophy, a single session of low-intensity NMES and voluntary training may not be effective for strengthening CS pathways to the SOL muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899312     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3194-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  76 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistent changes in excitability of human motor cortex.

Authors:  C Shona Charlton; Michael C Ridding; Philip D Thompson; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

5.  Repetitive common peroneal nerve stimulation increases ankle dorsiflexor motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Brandon Lapallo; Michael Duffield; Briana M Abel; Ferne Pomerantz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Plantarflexor weakness as a limiting factor of gait speed in stroke subjects and the compensating role of hip flexors.

Authors:  S Nadeau; D Gravel; A B Arsenault; D Bourbonnais
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials after repetitive voluntary hand movements depends on the type of motor activity.

Authors:  B Hauptmann; A Skrotzki; H Hummelsheim
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10

8.  Functional electrical stimulation of ankle plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles: effects on poststroke gait.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; Ramu Perumal; Darcy S Reisman; Angela Jancosko; Katherine S Rudolph; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Increase in tibialis anterior motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve.

Authors:  Svetlana Khaslavskaia; Michel Ladouceur; Thomas Sinkjaer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Yuri Yamamoto; Satoki Inoue; Munehisa Koizumi; Yurito Ueda; Yoshinori Takakura; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Combined Application of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Volitional Contractions on Thigh Muscle Strength, Knee Pain, and Physical Performance in Women at Risk for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kaitlin G Rabe; Hiroo Matsuse; Anthony Jackson; Neil A Segal
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Yohei Masugi; Hiroki Obata; Atsushi Sasaki; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary commands on the spinal reflex excitability of remote limb muscles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Atsushi Sasaki; Hikaru Yokoyama; Matija Milosevic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Shi Zhou; Shuang-Shuang Zhang; Zachary J Crowley-McHattan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Immediate Carryover Effects of Peroneal Functional Electrical Stimulation Differ between People with and without Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Uri Gottlieb; Jay R Hoffman; Shmuel Springer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Changes in corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability through functional electrical stimulation with and without observation and imagination of walking.

Authors:  Naotsugu Kaneko; Atsushi Sasaki; Hikaru Yokoyama; Yohei Masugi; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Modulation of spinal excitability following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed to voluntary contraction.

Authors:  Riccardo Borzuola; Luciana Labanca; Andrea Macaluso; Luca Laudani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.