Literature DB >> 30460394

Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors.

Matija Milosevic1,2, Yohei Masugi3,4, Hiroki Obata5, Atsushi Sasaki3, Milos R Popovic6,7, Kimitaka Nakazawa3.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of lower limbs elicits muscle contractions through the activation of efferent fibers and concomitant recruitment of afferent fibers, which can modulate excitability of the central nervous system. However, neural mechanisms of NMES and how unilateral stimulation of the soleus affects spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles bilaterally remains unknown. Twelve able-bodied participants were recruited, and spinal reflex excitability changes were tested after four interventions, each applied for 60 s, on the right plantar flexors: (1) motor-level NMES; (2) sensory-level NMES; (3) voluntary contraction; (4) rest. Spinal reflexes were elicited using single-pulse transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation applied on the lumbar level of the spinal cord to evoke bilateral responses in multiple lower limb muscles, while maximum motor response (Mmax) was tested in the soleus by stimulating the posterior tibial nerve. Spinal reflexes and Mmax before each intervention were compared to immediately after and every 5 min subsequently, for 15 min. Results showed that motor-level NMES inhibited spinal reflexes of the soleus and other studied muscles of the ipsilateral leg, but not the contralateral leg (except vastus medialis) for 15 min, while not affecting soleus muscle properties (Mmax). Voluntary contraction effect lasted less than 5 min, while sensory-level NMES and rest did not produce an effect. Short-term spinal reflex excitability was likely affected because antidromic impulses during motor-level NMES coincided in the spinal cord with afferent inputs to induce spinal neuroplasticity, whereas afferent input alone did not produce short-term effects. Such activation of muscles with NMES could reduce spasticity in individuals with neurological impairments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Neuroplasticity; Rehabilitation; Soleus; Spinal reflex

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30460394     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5437-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Posture-related changes in heteronymous recurrent inhibition from quadriceps to ankle muscles in humans.

Authors:  H Barbeau; V Marchand-Pauvert; S Meunier; G Nicolas; E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cross-education of muscle strength is greater with stimulated than voluntary contractions.

Authors:  T Hortobágyi; K Scott; J Lambert; G Hamilton; J Tracy
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 3.  Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations.

Authors:  M R Popovic; A Curt; T Keller; V Dietz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Differential changes in corticospinal and Ia input to tibialis anterior and soleus motor neurones during voluntary contraction in man.

Authors:  H Morita; E Olivier; J Baumgarten; N T Petersen; L O Christensen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2000-09

5.  Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation--an hypothesis.

Authors:  D N Rushton
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Post-exercise facilitation and depression of M wave and motor evoked potentials in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Marianne Lentz; Jørgen Feldbaek Nielsen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modulation of H-reflex excitability by tetanic stimulation.

Authors:  Tomoko Kitago; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Gianpiero Liuzzi; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Task-related changes of transmission in the pathway of heteronymous spinal recurrent inhibition from soleus to quadriceps motor neurones in man.

Authors:  J F Iles; A Ali; J Pardoe
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal ia inhibition in humans.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Edelle C Field-Fote; Mary Kay Floeter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Short-term facilitation effects elicited by cortical priming through theta burst stimulation and functional electrical stimulation of upper-limb muscles.

Authors:  Na Cao; Atsushi Sasaki; Akiko Yuasa; Milos R Popovic; Matija Milosevic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary commands on the spinal reflex excitability of remote limb muscles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Atsushi Sasaki; Hikaru Yokoyama; Matija Milosevic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Pathway-specific modulatory effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation during pedaling in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Shi-Chun Bao; Wing-Cheong Leung; Vincent C K Cheung; Ping Zhou; Kai-Yu Tong
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Recovery cycles of posterior root-muscle reflexes evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and of the H reflex in individuals with intact and injured spinal cord.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; Brigitta Freundl; Heinrich Binder; Karen Minassian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation to improve upper limb function in a patient with acute central cord syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Hideaki Matsuo; Masafumi Kubota; Yasue Hori; Yuya Izubuchi; Ai Takahashi; Shuji Watanabe; Hideaki Nakajima; Akihiko Matsumine
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Cesar Marquez-Chin; Kei Masani; Masayuki Hirata; Taishin Nomura; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Modulation of spinal excitability following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed to voluntary contraction.

Authors:  Riccardo Borzuola; Luciana Labanca; Andrea Macaluso; Luca Laudani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.