Literature DB >> 18635490

The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs.

Hironobu Hayashi1, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Yuri Yamamoto, Satoki Inoue, Munehisa Koizumi, Yurito Ueda, Yoshinori Takakura, Hitoshi Furuya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, we reported a new technique to augment motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) under general anesthesia, posttetanic MEP (p-MEP), in which tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation enlarged amplitudes of MEPs from the muscle innervated by the nerve subjected to tetanic stimulation. In the present study, we tested whether tetanic stimulation of the left tibial nerve can also augment amplitudes of MEPs from the muscles which are not innervated by the nerve subjected to tetanic stimulation.
METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing spinal surgery under propofol-fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade were examined. For conventional MEP (c-MEP) recording, transcranial stimulation with train-of-five pulses was delivered to C3-4, and the compound muscle action potentials were bilaterally recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor hallucis (AH), tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles. For p-MEP recording, tetanic stimulation (50 Hz, 50 mA of stimulus intensity) with a duration of 5 s was applied to the left tibial nerve at the ankle 1 s before transcranial stimulation. Transcranial stimulation and recording of compound muscle action potentials were performed in the same manner as c-MEP recording. Amplitudes of c-MEP and p-MEP were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
RESULTS: Amplitudes of p-MEPs from the left AH muscle innervated by the left tibial nerve with tetanic stimulation were significantly larger compared with those of c-MEPs. Amplitudes of p-MEPs from the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis and soleus muscles and right AH and tibialis anterior muscles, which were not innervated by the left tibial nerve with tetanic stimulation, were also significantly larger compared with those of c-MEPs.
CONCLUSION: In patients under propofol and fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade, the application of tetanic stimulation to the left tibial nerve augmented the amplitudes of MEPs from the muscles without tetanic nerve stimulation and those with stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635490     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318177082e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials: development of post-tetanic motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hironobu Hayashi; Yuri Yamamoto; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Different effects of tetanic stimulation of facial nerve and ulnar nerve on transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Shen Sun; Fu-Bo Tian; Shao-Qang Huang; Jun Zhang; Wei-Min Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion.

Authors:  Olle Lagerquist; Cameron S Mang; David F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evaluation of the applicability of sevoflurane during post-tetanic myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Ryuichi Abe; Yuri Yamamoto; Satoki Inoue; Munehisa Koizumi; Yoshinori Takakura; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.