Literature DB >> 21360230

Repetitive common peroneal nerve stimulation increases ankle dorsiflexor motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord lesions.

Aiko K Thompson1, Brandon Lapallo, Michael Duffield, Briana M Abel, Ferne Pomerantz.   

Abstract

Plasticity of corticospinal tract (CST) activity likely plays a key role in motor function recovery after central nervous system (CNS) lesions. In non-injured adults, 30 min of repetitive common peroneal nerve stimulation (rCPnS) increases CST excitability by 40-50% and the effect persists for at least 30 min. The present study evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) the changes in CST excitability after 30 min of rCPnS in people with foot drop due to incomplete SCI. Suprathreshold rCPnS (25 Hz, alternating 1 s on 1 s off stimulation cycle) was given for two 15-min periods, while the subject sat at rest with ankle and knee joints fixed. Before, between, and after the periods of stimulation, the tibialis anterior (TA) motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to TMS were measured at a TMS intensity that originally produced a half-maximum MEP (typically 10-20% above threshold) while the sitting subject provided 25-30% maximum voluntary TA contraction. In 10 subjects with SCI, the peak-to-peak TA MEP increased by 14 ± 3% after rCPnS and the peak increase (+21 ± 7%) occurred 15 min after the cessation of rCPnS. The TA H-reflex, measured in separate experiments in 7 subjects, did not increase after rCPnS. The results indicate that rCPnS can increase CST excitability for the TA in people with incomplete SCI, although its effects appear smaller and shorter lasting than those found in non-injured control subjects. Such short-term plasticity in the CST excitability induced by rCPnS may contribute to long-term therapeutic effects of functional electrical stimulation previously reported in people with CNS lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21360230     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2607-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

1.  New graphical method to measure silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M A Garvey; U Ziemann; D A Becker; C A Barker; J J Bartko
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on spinal excitatory and inhibitory reflexes in ankle extensor and flexor muscles.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Brian Doran; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Long-term therapeutic and orthotic effects of a foot drop stimulator on walking performance in progressive and nonprogressive neurological disorders.

Authors:  Richard B Stein; Dirk G Everaert; Aiko K Thompson; Su Ling Chong; Maura Whittaker; Jenny Robertson; Gerald Kuether
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Soleus stretch reflex modulation during gait in humans.

Authors:  T Sinkjaer; J B Andersen; B Larsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reciprocal inhibition following lesions of the spinal cord in man.

Authors:  P Ashby; M Wiens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Corticospinal tract transection prevents operantly conditioned H-reflex increase in rats.

Authors:  Xiang Yang Chen; Jonathan S Carp; Lu Chen; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II). Part II: Medical evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients.

Authors:  M Solomonow; E Reisin; E Aguilar; R V Baratta; R Best; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Appearance of reciprocal facilitation of ankle extensors from ankle flexors in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C Crone; L L Johnsen; F Biering-Sørensen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Increase in tibialis anterior motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve.

Authors:  Svetlana Khaslavskaia; Michel Ladouceur; Thomas Sinkjaer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Yohei Masugi; Hiroki Obata; Atsushi Sasaki; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Restoring walking after spinal cord injury: operant conditioning of spinal reflexes can help.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion.

Authors:  Olle Lagerquist; Cameron S Mang; David F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of spinal cord injury-induced changes in muscle activation on foot drag in a computational rat ankle model.

Authors:  Brian K Hillen; Devin L Jindrich; James J Abbas; Gary T Yamaguchi; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motor recovery after spinal cord injury enhanced by strengthening corticospinal synaptic transmission.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Operant conditioning of the tibialis anterior motor evoked potential in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Rachel H Cote; Janice M Sniffen; Jodi A Brangaccio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  A Comparison of FES and SCS for Neuroplastic Recovery After SCI: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lynsey D Duffell; Nicholas de Neufvillle Donaldson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Operant Up-Conditioning of the Tibialis Anterior Motor-Evoked Potential in Multiple Sclerosis: Feasibility Case Studies.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Briana M Favale; Jacqueline Velez; Patricia Falivena
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.