OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review of the literature examining the relationship between built environments (e.g., parks, trails, sidewalks) and physical activity (PA) or obesity rates. METHODS: We performed a 2-step inclusion protocol to identify empirical articles examining any form of built environment and any form of PA (or obesity rate) as the outcome. We extracted data from included abstracts for analysis by using a standard code sheet developed for this study. RESULTS: Of 169 included articles, 89.2% reported beneficial relationships-but virtually all articles utilized simple observational study designs not suited for determining causality. Studies utilizing objective PA measures (e.g., pedometer) were 18% less likely to identify a beneficial relationship. Articles focusing on children in community settings (-14.2%), those examining direct measures of obesity (-6.2%), or those with an academic first author (-3.4%) were less likely to find a beneficial relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers at federal and local levels should encourage more rigorous scientific research to determine whether altered built environments will result in increased PA and decreased obesity rates.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review of the literature examining the relationship between built environments (e.g., parks, trails, sidewalks) and physical activity (PA) or obesity rates. METHODS: We performed a 2-step inclusion protocol to identify empirical articles examining any form of built environment and any form of PA (or obesity rate) as the outcome. We extracted data from included abstracts for analysis by using a standard code sheet developed for this study. RESULTS: Of 169 included articles, 89.2% reported beneficial relationships-but virtually all articles utilized simple observational study designs not suited for determining causality. Studies utilizing objective PA measures (e.g., pedometer) were 18% less likely to identify a beneficial relationship. Articles focusing on children in community settings (-14.2%), those examining direct measures of obesity (-6.2%), or those with an academic first author (-3.4%) were less likely to find a beneficial relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers at federal and local levels should encourage more rigorous scientific research to determine whether altered built environments will result in increased PA and decreased obesity rates.
Authors: Tetyana I Aksenova; Olga K Chibirova; Oleksandr A Dryga; Igor V Tetko; Alim-Louis Benabid; Alessandro E P Villa Journal: Methods Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.608
Authors: D B Allison; J L Mentore; M Heo; L P Chandler; J C Cappelleri; M C Infante; P J Weiden Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Allison A Hedley; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jamila L Kwarteng; Amy J Schulz; Graciela B Mentz; Shannon N Zenk; Alisha A Opperman Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Peter James; Jaime E Hart; J Aaron Hipp; Jonathan A Mitchell; Jacqueline Kerr; Philip M Hurvitz; Karen Glanz; Francine Laden Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jennifer C Robinson; Tiffany L Carson; Erica R Johnson; Claudia M Hardy; James M Shikany; Eva Green; Lillie M Willis; John V Marron; Yufeng Li; Choo Hyung Lee; Monica L Baskin Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Elizabeth Tarlov; Lisa M Powell; Coady Wing; Stephen A Matthews; Sandy Slater; Howard S Gordon; Michael Berbaum; Marian L Fitzgibbon Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2017-03-02
Authors: Russell R Pate; Kerry L McIver; Natalie Colabianchi; Richard P Troiano; Jared P Reis; Dianna D Carroll; Janet E Fulton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Genevieve Fridlund Dunton; Estela Almanza; Michael Jerrett; Jennifer Wolch; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043