Eric C Schreiber1, Sha X Chang. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. erics@med.unc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an experimental radiotherapy technique that has shown potent antitumor effects with minimal damage to normal tissue in animal studies. This unique form of radiation is currently only produced in a few large synchrotron accelerator research facilities in the world. To promote widespread translational research on this promising treatment technology we have proposed and are in the initial development stages of a compact MRT system that is based on carbon nanotube field emission x-ray technology. We report on a Monte Carlo based feasibility study of the compact MRT system design. METHODS: Monte Carlo calculations were performed using EGSnrc-based codes. The proposed small animal research MRT device design includes carbon nanotube cathodes shaped to match the corresponding MRT collimator apertures, a common reflection anode with filter, and a MRT collimator. Each collimator aperture is sized to deliver a beam width ranging from 30 to 200 μm at 18.6 cm source-to-axis distance. Design parameters studied with Monte Carlo include electron energy, cathode design, anode angle, filtration, and collimator design. Calculations were performed for single and multibeam configurations. RESULTS: Increasing the energy from 100 kVp to 160 kVp increased the photon fluence through the collimator by a factor of 1.7. Both energies produced a largely uniform fluence along the long dimension of the microbeam, with 5% decreases in intensity near the edges. The isocentric dose rate for 160 kVp was calculated to be 700 Gy∕min∕A in the center of a 3 cm diameter target. Scatter contributions resulting from collimator size were found to produce only small (<7%) changes in the dose rate for field widths greater than 50 μm. Dose vs depth was weakly dependent on filtration material. The peak-to-valley ratio varied from 10 to 100 as the separation between adjacent microbeams varies from 150 to 1000 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the proposed compact MRT system design is capable of delivering a sufficient dose rate and peak-to-valley ratio for small animal MRT studies.
PURPOSE: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an experimental radiotherapy technique that has shown potent antitumor effects with minimal damage to normal tissue in animal studies. This unique form of radiation is currently only produced in a few large synchrotron accelerator research facilities in the world. To promote widespread translational research on this promising treatment technology we have proposed and are in the initial development stages of a compact MRT system that is based on carbon nanotube field emission x-ray technology. We report on a Monte Carlo based feasibility study of the compact MRT system design. METHODS: Monte Carlo calculations were performed using EGSnrc-based codes. The proposed small animal research MRT device design includes carbon nanotube cathodes shaped to match the corresponding MRT collimator apertures, a common reflection anode with filter, and a MRT collimator. Each collimator aperture is sized to deliver a beam width ranging from 30 to 200 μm at 18.6 cm source-to-axis distance. Design parameters studied with Monte Carlo include electron energy, cathode design, anode angle, filtration, and collimator design. Calculations were performed for single and multibeam configurations. RESULTS: Increasing the energy from 100 kVp to 160 kVp increased the photon fluence through the collimator by a factor of 1.7. Both energies produced a largely uniform fluence along the long dimension of the microbeam, with 5% decreases in intensity near the edges. The isocentric dose rate for 160 kVp was calculated to be 700 Gy∕min∕A in the center of a 3 cm diameter target. Scatter contributions resulting from collimator size were found to produce only small (<7%) changes in the dose rate for field widths greater than 50 μm. Dose vs depth was weakly dependent on filtration material. The peak-to-valley ratio varied from 10 to 100 as the separation between adjacent microbeams varies from 150 to 1000 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the proposed compact MRT system design is capable of delivering a sufficient dose rate and peak-to-valley ratio for small animal MRT studies.
Authors: Audrey Bouchet; Benjamin Lemasson; Géraldine Le Duc; Cécile Maisin; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Erik Albert Siegbahn; Luc Renaud; Enam Khalil; Chantal Rémy; Cathy Poillot; Alberto Bravin; Jean A Laissue; Emmanuel L Barbier; Raphaël Serduc Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael J Zelefsky; Zvi Fuks; Margie Hunt; Yoshiya Yamada; Christine Marion; C Clifton Ling; Howard Amols; E S Venkatraman; Steven A Leibel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthew D Belley; Ian N Stanton; Mike Hadsell; Rachel Ger; Brian W Langloss; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Sha X Chang; Michael J Therien; Terry T Yoshizumi Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Christina Inscoe; Pavel Chtcheprov; Michael Hadsell; Yueh Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou Journal: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.512
Authors: Andrew N Fontanella; Mary-Keara Boss; Michael Hadsell; Jian Zhang; Thies Schroeder; Katherine G Berman; Mark W Dewhirst; Sha Chang; Gregory M Palmer Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Laurel M Burk; Christy R Inscoe; Michael J Hadsell; Pavel Chtcheprov; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Elisabeth Schültke; Jacques Balosso; Thomas Breslin; Guido Cavaletti; Valentin Djonov; Francois Esteve; Michael Grotzer; Guido Hildebrandt; Alexander Valdman; Jean Laissue Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Johanna Winter; Marek Galek; Christoph Matejcek; Jan J Wilkens; Kurt Aulenbacher; Stephanie E Combs; Stefan Bartzsch Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-06-11