Matthew D Belley1, Ian N Stanton2, Mike Hadsell3, Rachel Ger3, Brian W Langloss2, Jianping Lu3, Otto Zhou4, Sha X Chang5, Michael J Therien2, Terry T Yoshizumi6. 1. Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705 and Duke Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710. 2. Department of Chemistry, Duke University, 124 Science Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27708. 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599. 4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599. 5. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599. 6. Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705;Duke Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710; and Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Here, the authors describe a dosimetry measurement technique for microbeam radiation therapy using a nanoparticle-terminated fiber-optic dosimeter (nano-FOD). METHODS: The nano-FOD was placed in the center of a 2 cm diameter mouse phantom to measure the deep tissue dose and lateral beam profile of a planar x-ray microbeam. RESULTS: The continuous dose rate at the x-ray microbeam peak measured with the nano-FOD was 1.91 ± 0.06 cGy s(-1), a value 2.7% higher than that determined via radiochromic film measurements (1.86 ± 0.15 cGy s(-1)). The nano-FOD-determined lateral beam full-width half max value of 420 μm exceeded that measured using radiochromic film (320 μm). Due to the 8° angle of the collimated microbeam and resulting volumetric effects within the scintillator, the profile measurements reported here are estimated to achieve a resolution of ∼0.1 mm; however, for a beam angle of 0°, the theoretical resolution would approach the thickness of the scintillator (∼0.01 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This work provides proof-of-concept data and demonstrates that the novel nano-FOD device can be used to perform real-time dosimetry in microbeam radiation therapy to measure the continuous dose rate at the x-ray microbeam peak as well as the lateral beam shape.
PURPOSE: Here, the authors describe a dosimetry measurement technique for microbeam radiation therapy using a nanoparticle-terminated fiber-optic dosimeter (nano-FOD). METHODS: The nano-FOD was placed in the center of a 2 cm diameter mouse phantom to measure the deep tissue dose and lateral beam profile of a planar x-ray microbeam. RESULTS: The continuous dose rate at the x-ray microbeam peak measured with the nano-FOD was 1.91 ± 0.06 cGy s(-1), a value 2.7% higher than that determined via radiochromic film measurements (1.86 ± 0.15 cGy s(-1)). The nano-FOD-determined lateral beam full-width half max value of 420 μm exceeded that measured using radiochromic film (320 μm). Due to the 8° angle of the collimated microbeam and resulting volumetric effects within the scintillator, the profile measurements reported here are estimated to achieve a resolution of ∼0.1 mm; however, for a beam angle of 0°, the theoretical resolution would approach the thickness of the scintillator (∼0.01 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This work provides proof-of-concept data and demonstrates that the novel nano-FOD device can be used to perform real-time dosimetry in microbeam radiation therapy to measure the continuous dose rate at the x-ray microbeam peak as well as the lateral beam shape.
Authors: F Avraham Dilmanian; Zhong Zhong; Tigran Bacarian; Helene Benveniste; Pantaleo Romanelli; Ruiliang Wang; Jeremy Welwart; Tetsuya Yuasa; Eliot M Rosen; David J Anschel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jeffrey C Crosbie; Robin L Anderson; Kai Rothkamm; Christina M Restall; Leonie Cann; Saleela Ruwanpura; Sarah Meachem; Naoto Yagi; Imants Svalbe; Robert A Lewis; Bryan R G Williams; Peter A W Rogers Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Raphaël Serduc; Audrey Bouchet; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Jean A Laissue; Jenny Spiga; Sukhéna Sarun; Alberto Bravin; Caroline Fonta; Luc Renaud; Jean Boutonnat; Erik Albert Siegbahn; François Estève; Géraldine Le Duc Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: M Hadsell; J Zhang; P Laganis; F Sprenger; J Shan; L Zhang; L Burk; H Yuan; S Chang; J Lu; O Zhou Journal: Appl Phys Lett Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: James Archer; Enbang Li; Marco Petasecca; Andrew Dipuglia; Matthew Cameron; Andrew Stevenson; Chris Hall; Daniel Hausermann; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Michael Lerch Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 4.379