Literature DB >> 22892888

Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma.

Kaweh Mansouri, Felipe A Medeiros, Ali Tafreshi, Robert N Weinreb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the safety, tolerability, and reproducibility of intraocular pressure (IOP) patterns during repeated continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring with a contact lens sensor. METHODS Forty patients suspected of having glaucoma (n = 21) or with established glaucoma (n = 19) were studied. Patients participated in two 24-hour IOP monitoring sessions (S1 and S2) at a 1-week interval (SENSIMED Triggerfish CLS; Sensimed AG). Patients pursued daily activities, and sleep behavior was not controlled. Incidence of adverse events and tolerability (visual analog scale score) were assessed. Reproducibility of signal patterns was assessed using Pearson correlations. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the patients was 55.5 (15.7) years, and 60% were male. Main adverse events were blurred vision (82%), conjunctival hyperemia (80%), and superficial punctate keratitis (15%). The mean (SD) visual analog scale score was 27.2 (18.5) mm in S1 and 23.8 (18.7) mm in S2 (P = .22). Overall correlation between the 2 sessions was 0.59 (0.51 for no glaucoma medication and 0.63 for glaucoma medication) (P = .12). Mean (SD) positive linear slopes of the sensor signal from wake to 2 hours into sleep were detected in both sessions for the no glaucoma medication group (S1: 0.40 [0.34], P < .001; S2: 0.33 [0.30], P < .01) but not for the glaucoma medication group (S1: 0.24 [0.60], P = .06; S2: 0.40 [0.40], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Repeated use of the contact lens sensor demonstrated good safety and tolerability. The recorded IOP patterns showed fair to good reproducibility, suggesting that data from continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring may be useful in the management of patients with glaucoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01319617.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892888      PMCID: PMC3859375          DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  35 in total

1.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Quality of diurnal intraocular pressure control in primary open-angle patients treated with latanoprost compared with surgically treated glaucoma patients: a prospective trial.

Authors:  K Mansouri; S Orguel; A Mermoud; I Haefliger; J Flammer; E Ravinet; T Shaarawy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Wireless contact lens sensor for intraocular pressure monitoring: assessment on enucleated pig eyes.

Authors:  Matteo Leonardi; Elie M Pitchon; Arnaud Bertsch; Philippe Renaud; André Mermoud
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation monitoring using an ocular telemetry Sensor: tolerability and functionality in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Stefan De Smedt; André Mermoud; Corinne Schnyder
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Clinical utility of intraocular pressure monitoring outside of normal office hours in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Yaniv Barkana; Sarah Anis; Jeffrey Liebmann; Celso Tello; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06

7.  Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  Boel Bengtsson; M Cristina Leske; Leslie Hyman; Anders Heijl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Bulbar conjunctival fluorescein staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers.

Authors:  C Lakkis; N A Brennan
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1996-07

9.  The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes.

Authors:  John H K Liu; Xiaoyan Zhang; Daniel F Kripke; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  47 in total

1.  Diurnal versus office-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation in primary adult onset glaucoma.

Authors:  Tarun Arora; Shveta Jindal Bali; Vishal Arora; Meenakshi Wadhwani; Anita Panda; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-16

2.  Reply to: 'TLP: a premature concept'.

Authors:  I Januleviciene; L Siaudvytyte; A Daveckaite; A Ragauskas; B Siesky; A Harris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  An implantable microfluidic device for self-monitoring of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Ismail E Araci; Baolong Su; Stephen R Quake; Yossi Mandel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Microelectromechanical systems and nephrology: the next frontier in renal replacement technology.

Authors:  Steven Kim; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.620

5.  Analysis of 24-Hour IOP-related Pattern Changes After Medical Therapy.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Felipe A Medeiros; John H K Liu; Carlos G De Moraes; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Improvement of fluctuations of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery in primary angle closure glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Naoki Tojo; Mitsuya Otsuka; Akio Miyakoshi; Kazuya Fujita; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  An electric-eel-inspired soft power source from stacked hydrogels.

Authors:  Thomas B H Schroeder; Anirvan Guha; Aaron Lamoureux; Gloria VanRenterghem; David Sept; Max Shtein; Jerry Yang; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Can a contact lens sensor predict the success of trabectome surgery?

Authors:  Naoki Tojo; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Development of a Smart Pump for Monitoring and Controlling Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Simon A Bello; Sharad Malavade; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Intraocular pressure changes during sexual activity.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.