| Literature DB >> 22890170 |
Mohamed M Youssef1, Mahmoud A Amin.
Abstract
Biginelli reaction of ethyl acetoacetate, thiourea and the appropriate aromatic aldehyde was used to produce ethyl 4-aryl-6-methyl-2-thioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylates, that reacted with bromomalononitrile to give ethyl 3-amino-5-aryl-2-cyano-7-methyl-5H-thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidine-6-carboxylates rather than the isomeric 7H-thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidines. Thiazolopyrimidine derivatives reacted with carbon disulphide to yield ethyl 9-aryl-7-methyl-2,4-dithioxo-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-thiazolo[3,2-a:4,5-d']dipyrimidine-8-carboxylates, that reacted with phenacyl bromide to produce ethyl 8-methyl-10-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-substituted-5-thioxo-2(un)subatituted-10H-thiazolo[3'',2'':1',2']pyrimido[4',5':4,5]thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidine-9-carboxylates. The aforementioned reactions were carried out using both conventional chemical methods and with the assistance of microwave irradaition. Comparison between both methods showed that the microwave assisted method is preferable because of the time reduction and yield improvements achieved. The new compounds were tested for their biological activity as antioxidants, antibacterial or antifungal agents. Some of the new compounds were found to have moderate to good antioxidant and antimicrobial activities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22890170 PMCID: PMC6268533 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17089652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of pyrimidinethiones, thiazolopyrimidines, thiazolodipyrimidines and thiazolopyrimidothiazol opyrimidines.
Comparison between traditional methods and microwave assisted methods of synthesis of compounds 1a–d, 3a–d, 5a–d, and 7a–c.
| Compound no. | Reaction Yield % | Reaction Time | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave | Conventional Method | Microwave | Conventional Method | |
|
| 82 | 55 | 5 min | 3 h |
|
| 87 | 58 | 5 min | 3 h |
|
| 70 | 42 | 5 min | 3 h |
|
| 62 | 35 | 5 min | 3 h |
|
| 81 | 56 | 10 min | Overnight |
|
| 85 | 48 | 10 min | Overnight |
|
| 85 | 53 | 10 min | Overnight |
|
| 68 | 40 | 10 min | Overnight |
|
| 82 | 50 | 15 min | 8 h |
|
| 80 | 53 | 15 min | 8 h |
|
| 79 | 44 | 15 min | 8 h |
|
| 69 | 37 | 15 min | 8 h |
|
| 74 | 43 | 5 min | 3 h |
|
| 88 | 52 | 5 min | 3 h |
|
| 83 | 58 | 5 min | 3 h |
Antioxidant assays by erythrocyte hemolysis (A/B × 100).
| Compounds | Absorbance of samples (A) | Hemolysis (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Complete hemolysis with distilled water (B) | 0.660 | - |
| Ascorbic acid | 0.026 | 3.93 |
|
| 0.082 | 10.33 |
|
| 0.075 | 9.12 |
|
| 0.090 | 13.01 |
|
| 0.092 | 14.12 |
|
| 0.035 | 5.22 |
|
| 0.031 | 4.68 |
|
| 0.045 | 6.92 |
|
| 0.051 | 8.02 |
|
| 0.115 | 21.60 |
|
| 0.112 | 19.25 |
|
| 0.132 | 24.07 |
|
| 0.130 | 23.12 |
|
| 0.042 | 6.36 |
|
| 0.045 | 6.81 |
|
| 0.043 | 6.51 |
Antioxidant assays by ABTS method [Abs. (control) − Abs.(test)/Abs.(control) × 100].
| Compounds | Absorbance of sample | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.54 | 0 |
| 0.06 | 88.8 | |
|
| 0.20 | 63.0 |
|
| 0.23 | 57.4 |
|
| 0.29 | 46.3 |
|
| 0.28 | 48.1 |
|
| 0.10 | 81.5 |
|
| 0.12 | 77.7 |
|
| 0.15 | 72.2 |
|
| 0.13 | 75.9 |
|
| 0.45 | 16.6 |
|
| 0.42 | 22.2 |
|
| 0.48 | 11.1 |
|
| 0.43 | 20.3 |
|
| 0.17 | 68.5 |
|
| 0.19 | 64.8 |
|
| 0.16 | 70.3 |
Assays for bleomycin-dependent DNA damage.
| Compound | Absorbance of Samples |
|---|---|
|
| 0.020 |
|
| 0.026 |
|
| 0.029 |
|
| 0.037 |
|
| 0.033 |
Antimicrobial activities of the newly synthesized compounds.
| Compd. No. | Inhibition zone (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-negative | Gram-positive | Fungi Yeast | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 12 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
|
| 14 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 15 | 11 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 0 |
|
| 12 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 10 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | |
|
| 11 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | |
|
| 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chloram-phenicol® | 22 | 21 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 12 | 0 |
| Ampicillin® | 24 | 20 | 19 | 22 | 24 | 14 | 14 |
E. coli = Escherichia coli; P. putida = Pseudomonas putida; B. subtilis = Bacillus subtilis; S. lactis = Streptococcus lactis; A. niger = Aspergillus niger; P. sp. = Penicillium sp.; C. albicans = Candida albicans; The sensitivity of microorganisms to the tested compounds is identified in the following manner *: Highly sensitive = Inhibition zone: 15–20 mm; Moderately sensitive = Inhibition zone: 10–15 mm; Slightly sensitive = Inhibition zone: 1–10 mm; Not sensitive = Inhibition zone: 0 mm; * each result represents the average of triplicate readings.