PURPOSE: Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness in the world. Juvenile-onset open-angle is a subtype of glaucoma. In this context, we investigate the possible mutations in the promoter and coding regions of the CYP1B1 gene among patients suffering juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma (JOAG). METHODS: The CYP1B1 gene was analysed for mutations in 61 unrelated Taiwanese probands with JOAG and in 100 healthy control subjects. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and then subjected to PCR. The amplified products were screened for base mutations by autosequence. Next, data from the two groups were compared using the χ(2) test. Additionally, three-dimensional (3D) modelling of the human wild-type and p.R390H mutation was performed using SWISS-MODEL, an automated homology modelling program. Finally, the figure was prepared for the modelled structures by using the Accelrys ViewerLite 5.0 program. RESULTS: Analysis results indicated two CYP1B1 mutations and five polymorphisms. The prevalence of CYP1B1 gene mutations in this study was 4.92% (3/61). The mutations included a missense mutation (p.Arg390His; 2/3) and a mutation in the 5'-untranslated region (c.1-313A>C; 1/3). Moreover, computer-assisted modelling revealed that this p.R390H mutation affects the intra-molecular interaction in the hydrogen-bonding interaction with Glu387 and Asn428, thus altering significantly the efficiency of the haem-binding and proper folding of the molecule. CONCLUSIONS: As a result, the p.Arg390His mutation might affect the protein structure and, ultimately, the normal function of CYP1B1. Therefore, we suggest that the c.1169G>A (p.Arg390His) mutation of CYP1B1 may be a risk factor for the development of JOAG.
PURPOSE:Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness in the world. Juvenile-onset open-angle is a subtype of glaucoma. In this context, we investigate the possible mutations in the promoter and coding regions of the CYP1B1 gene among patients suffering juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma (JOAG). METHODS: The CYP1B1 gene was analysed for mutations in 61 unrelated Taiwanese probands with JOAG and in 100 healthy control subjects. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and then subjected to PCR. The amplified products were screened for base mutations by autosequence. Next, data from the two groups were compared using the χ(2) test. Additionally, three-dimensional (3D) modelling of the human wild-type and p.R390H mutation was performed using SWISS-MODEL, an automated homology modelling program. Finally, the figure was prepared for the modelled structures by using the Accelrys ViewerLite 5.0 program. RESULTS: Analysis results indicated two CYP1B1 mutations and five polymorphisms. The prevalence of CYP1B1 gene mutations in this study was 4.92% (3/61). The mutations included a missense mutation (p.Arg390His; 2/3) and a mutation in the 5'-untranslated region (c.1-313A>C; 1/3). Moreover, computer-assisted modelling revealed that this p.R390H mutation affects the intra-molecular interaction in the hydrogen-bonding interaction with Glu387 and Asn428, thus altering significantly the efficiency of the haem-binding and proper folding of the molecule. CONCLUSIONS: As a result, the p.Arg390His mutation might affect the protein structure and, ultimately, the normal function of CYP1B1. Therefore, we suggest that the c.1169G>A (p.Arg390His) mutation of CYP1B1 may be a risk factor for the development of JOAG.
Authors: B A Bejjani; D W Stockton; R A Lewis; K F Tomey; D K Dueker; M Jabak; W F Astle; J R Lupski Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2000-02-12 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Andrea L Vincent; Gail Billingsley; Yvonne Buys; Alex V Levin; Megan Priston; Graham Trope; Donna Williams-Lyn; Elise Héon Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-01-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Tiger Zhou; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Shiwani Sharma; John Landers; Richard Mills; Ivan Goldberg; Paul R Healey; Stuart Graham; Alex W Hewitt; David A Mackey; Anna Galanopoulos; Robert J Casson; Jonathan B Ruddle; Jonathan Ellis; Paul Leo; Matthew A Brown; Stuart MacGregor; David J Lynn; Kathryn P Burdon; Jamie E Craig Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ashok Kumar Narsani; Ali Muhammad Waryah; Muhammad Rafiq; Hina Shaikh; Syed Habib Ahmed Naqvi; Raveet Kumar; Pawan Kumar Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Shakeel Ahmed Sheikh; Ali Muhammad Waryah; Ashok Kumar Narsani; Hina Shaikh; Imtiaz Ahmed Gilal; Khairuddin Shah; Muhammad Qasim; Azam Iqbal Memon; Pitambar Kewalramani; Naila Shaikh Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 2.367