Literature DB >> 25018621

Mutational spectrum of the CYP1B1 gene in Pakistani patients with primary congenital glaucoma: novel variants and genotype-phenotype correlations.

Shakeel Ahmed Sheikh1, Ali Muhammad Waryah2, Ashok Kumar Narsani3, Hina Shaikh1, Imtiaz Ahmed Gilal3, Khairuddin Shah3, Muhammad Qasim4, Azam Iqbal Memon1, Pitambar Kewalramani3, Naila Shaikh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the role of CYP1B1 mutations in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) in Pakistani patients.
METHODS: After consent was received, 20 families with at least more than one member affected with primary congenital glaucoma were enrolled in the study. The disease was confirmed with standard ophthalmological investigations. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood for localization of linkage and sequencing. Bioinformatics tools were used to assess the predicted pathological role of novel variants.
RESULTS: Ten out of 20 families (50%, 10/20) showed homozygosity with CYP1B1-linked short tandem repeat (STR) markers. On direct sequencing of the CYP1B1 gene in the linked families, six mutations, including two novel pathogenic variants, were identified. p. R390H was the most frequently found mutation in five families (50%, 5/10), whereas c.868_869insC, p.E229K, and p.A115P were found once in three families. Two novel mutations, a missense mutation (p.G36D) and an in-frame deletion mutation (p.G67-A70del), were segregated with disease phenotype in two families. Age of disease onset was congenital in all mutations; however, disease severity and response to clinical interventions varied among the mutations and families. Haplotype analysis using five polymorphisms revealed a distinct haplotype for a common mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort of Pakistani patients with PCG to be genetically screened for CYP1B1 mutations. Identifying common mutation and genotype-phenotype correlations may help in genetic testing and better prognosis for the disease. Novel mutations identified in the study may help in better understanding the pathophysiology of CYP1B1-associated glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25018621      PMCID: PMC4087121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Vis        ISSN: 1090-0535            Impact factor:   2.367


Introduction

Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG, OMIM 231300) is a rare form of glaucoma, inherited as an autosomal recessive trait [1]. PCG is associated with developmental anomalies of the anterior chamber as well as the trabecular meshwork and is characterized by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), increased corneal diameter, and optic disc damage [2]. PCG is the most common form of glaucoma in infants. The disease manifests at birth or in the first year of life and usually leads to permanent vision impairment. The incidence however varies among different populations: 1 in 1,250 in Slovakian gypsies, 1 in 2,500 in Saudi Arabians, 1 in 3,300 in southern Indians [3], and from 1:10,000 to 1:20,000 in Western populations [4]. Three chromosomal locations have been mapped for PCG: GLC3A at 2p21 [5], GLC3B at 1p36.2 [6], and GLC3C at 14q24.3 [7]. Mutations in only two genes, CYP1B1 (ID: 1545, OMIM: 601771) at GLC3A and LTBP2 (ID: 4053, OMIM: 602091) at GLC3C, have been associated with PCG [7]. Although contribution of cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) varies in different populations, worldwide CYP1B1 accounts for 50% of PCG cases [8].CYP1B1 consists of two coding exons and encodes the cytochrome P450 superfamily, subfamily B, polypeptide 1, a 543 amino acids long protein. It is expressed in the trabecular meshwork and in the posterior segment of the eye [9]. More than 150 PCG-associated mutations in CYP1B1 have been described [10,11]. The prevalence of CYP1B1 mutations varies significantly across different populations and geographic locations [12]. Notably, CYP1B1 mutations show incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity among populations of different ethnic origin [13,14]. The spectrum of CYP1B1 mutations in Pakistani patients with PCG is not well understood. Previously, only three familial cases with CYP1B1 mutations had been reported [15]. This study, therefore, was aimed to screen 20 familial cases of PCG for CYP1B1, to identify and determine common mutations, and to understand its penetrance and prevalence in the area.

Methods

Patient enrollment and clinical investigations

Twenty families affected with PCG were enrolled from Liaquat University Tertiary Care Hospital after obtaining written informed consent. The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. Detailed medical history of all participating families was recorded, and pedigrees were drawn to conform the inheritance pattern (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). Ethnicity-matched controls with no history of ocular disorders were enrolled in the study. All available affected individuals underwent detailed clinical investigations. IOP was assessed with Schiotz indentation tonometry. Angles of anterior chamber were examined with Goldmann gonioscope, and the field of vision was attempted by Humphrey perimetry wherever possible. The fundus was examined by using slit-lamp biomicroscopy with a +78 diopter lens.
Figure 1

Pedigrees mutated with p.R390H mutation. Male individuals are denoted by squares and females by circles. The filled squares and circles denote the affected individuals. The double line between individuals represents consanguineous marriage.

Figure 2

Pedigrees with three reported mutations. Male individuals are denoted by squares and females by circles. The filled squares and circles denote the affected individuals. The double line between individuals represents consanguineous marriage.

Figure 3

Pedigrees with novel mutations showing electropherograms with representative mutated, heterozygous carrier, and corresponding normal sequences. Male individuals are denoted by squares and females by circles. The filled squares and circles denote the affected individuals. The double line between individuals represents consanguineous marriage.

Pedigrees mutated with p.R390H mutation. Male individuals are denoted by squares and females by circles. The filled squares and circles denote the affected individuals. The double line between individuals represents consanguineous marriage. Pedigrees with three reported mutations. Male individuals are denoted by squares and females by circles. The filled squares and circles denote the affected individuals. The double line between individuals represents consanguineous marriage. Pedigrees with novel mutations showing electropherograms with representative mutated, heterozygous carrier, and corresponding normal sequences. Male individuals are denoted by squares and females by circles. The filled squares and circles denote the affected individuals. The double line between individuals represents consanguineous marriage.

Linkage analysis and genotyping

Peripheral blood was collected in EDTA filled tubes and genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes as described previously [16]. Four fluorescently labeled microsatellite markers, D2S1346, D2S177, D2S2163, and D2S2331, closely linked to the GLC3A locus, were genotyped for linkage analysis. PCR was performed for each marker in a 10 μl reaction mixture containing 50 ng DNA, 1 mM dNTPs, 0.4 U Taq polymerase, and 2 mM MgCl2. Amplification was performed on the GeneAmp PCR 2720 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on an ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer. Alleles were determined with Genotyper version 4 software (Applied Biosystems). Logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores were calculated by using the Easy Linkage 5.02 v graphical user interface. An autosomal recessive mode of inheritance with 100% penetrance and a disease allele frequency of 0.001 were used.

Mutation screening

Five overlapping pairs of sequencing primers for CYP1B1 were designed from the flanking sequence of each exon by using the Primer3 web tool. Amplification reaction was performed by using 50 ng DNA, 1 mM dNTPs, 1.5 pM primer, 0.3 U Taq polymerase, and 1.5 mM MgCl2 in the GeneAmp PCR 2720 (Applied Biosystems). PCR thermal conditions were optimized by denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles, each 20 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 58 °C, and 10 s at 72 °C, and final extension 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified product was resolved on 2% agarose gel and purified with ethanol precipitation. The sequencing reaction was performed by using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems) as described previously [17]. Sequencing was performed on the ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer, and the electropherograms were analyzed by using Chromas v 1.45.

Bioinformatics analysis

PolyPhen2 was used to predict pathogenic role of the novel substitution mutation [18]. The effect of the in-frame deletion on protein was predicted by using PROVIEN software [19] whereas CYP1B1 sequences of seven species were aligned with the help of the Clustal W tool to find the conservation status of the substituted and deleted amino acids. The biochemical properties of the wild-type and mutant amino acids and possible functional changes were studied by using the HOPE web tool [20].

Results

Twenty consanguineous families affected with congenital glaucoma who had more than one patient were enrolled from a tertiary care eye hospital in Hyderabad. Pedigree analysis suggested the autosomal recessive mode of inheritance. Linkage analysis showed homozygosity with CYP1B1-associated short tandem repeat (STR) markers in ten families (50%, 10/20). On direct sequencing of two coding exons of CYP1B1, six distinct homozygous mutations, segregating with disease phenotype, were found in all linked families. Among the six variants, three missense mutations, p. R390H, p.E229K, and p.A115P, and an insertion mutation, c.868_869insC, had previously been reported; while one missense variant, p.G36D, and a 12 bp in-frame deletion mutation, p.Gly67-Ala70del, were novel. The clinical features of all patients who have CYP1B1 mutations are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical features of PCG patients with CYP1B1 mutations.

Family ID (mutation)
patient NoCurrent age
Corneal diameter
Corneal edema
Corneal opacity
Haabs’ Striae
IOP (mmHg)
Visual acuity
C/D ratio
Surgery
YearsOS/OD (mm)OS/ODOS/ODOS/ODOS/ODOS/ODOS/OD
LUGL02 (p.R390H)








IV:4
25
NR/NR
NR/NR
++/++
−/−
NR/15
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
OS Trab
V:3
5
14/11.5
-/NR
-/++
−/−
17/29
6/36/NR
NR/0.3
OS Trab
V:4
6
14/14
−/−
−/−
−/−
17/29
6/12;6/24
0.2/0.5
Bilateral Trab
V:5
1
15/14
+/NR
-/++
+/NR
17/40
NR/NR
NR/NR
OS Trab
V:6
1.5
14/14
+/NR
-/++
−/−
35/35
FF/NR
0.4/NR
OS Trab
V:7
2.5
13/11.5
NR/NR
++/++
−/−
40/40
NR/NR
NR/NR
Bilateral Trab
LUGL03 (p.R390H)








IV:2
2.5
13/11.5
NR/NR
++/++
−/−
40/40
NR/NR
NR/NR
Bilateral Trab
LUGL15 (p.R390H)








IV:1
16
16/15.5
NR/NR
+/+
NR/NR
30/35
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
Not Done
IV:2
7
NR/NR
NR/NR
++/++
NR/NR
NR/NR
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
Not Done
IV:3
19
15/15
+/+
+/+
+/+
18/20
6/36;6/36
0.7/0.8
Bilateral Trab
LUGL17 (p.R390H)








V:4
11
10.3/10.4
−/−
−/−
−/−
14/17
6/24;6/18
0.8/0.9
Bilateral Trab
LUGL19 (p.R390H)








IV:4
18
NR/NR
NR/NR
NR/NR
++/++
40/35
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
Not Done
IV:5
33
NR/NR
NR/NR
NR/NR
NR/NR
NR/NR
NR/NR
NR/NR
Bilateral
V:3
7
15/15
++/++
−/−
−/−
38/32
HM/HM
NR/NR
Bilateral Trab
V:4
2
15/12
++/++
−/−
−/−
40/35
FF/FF
NR/NR
Bilateral Trab
LUGL06 (p.A115P)








IV:5
2.5
15.5/15
+/+
+/+
−/−
16/25
FF/FF
0.7/0.5
OS Trab
IV:10
30
15.5/15
NR/+
+/++
NR/NR
40/16
NPL/CF
TC/0.2
OD Trab
IV:11
16
15.5/15
+/NR
+/++
+/NR
24/40
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
OS Trab
LUGL07 (p.E229K)








IV:3
19
15/15
NR/NR
++/++
NR/NR
41.5/NR
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
OS Trab
IV:4
20
15/15
NR/NR
++/++
NR/NR
26.6/24
PL/PL
NR/NR
Bilateral Trab
IV:5
16
15/15
NR/NR
++/++
NR/NR
24.4/NR
NPL /NPL
NR/NR
OD Trab
LUGL08 (p.G36D)








4
16/11
++/++
++/++
+/NR
35/29
NPL/FF
NR/NR
Bilateral Trab
IV:3
3
41,980
++/NR
++/++
NR/NR
29/5
FF/NPL
NR/NR
OS Trab
IV:5
23
NR
NR
++/++
NR/NR
NR/NR
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
Not Done
IV:6
38
16/15
+/+
−/−
−/−
29/35
NPL/NPL
TC/TC
Not Done
LUGL09 (p.G67-A70del)







2
41,987
+/++
+/−-
−/−
40/40
FF/NPL
0.4/TC

IV:3
11
14/11.5
−/−
–/–
−/−
17/19
6/12;6/24
0.5/0.6
Bilateral Trab
LUGL13 (c.868_869InsC)







32
NR/NR
-/++
-/++
−/−
41,922
NPL/NPL
NR/NR
OS Trab
V:3
17
41,986
+/+
+/+
-/+
41,988
1/60;1/60
0.9/0.9
Bilateral Trab
V:4
11
41,986
++/−
+/−
−/−
41,933
NPL/6/12
NR/0.7
Not Done
V:51916/NR++/+++/+NR/NR42/10NPL/NPLNR/NRNot Done

NPL: No Perception of Light. PL: Perception of Light. FF: Fixation and Follow. HM: Hand Movement TC: Total Cupping. NR: Not Recordable. IOP: Intraocular Pressure

NPL: No Perception of Light. PL: Perception of Light. FF: Fixation and Follow. HM: Hand Movement TC: Total Cupping. NR: Not Recordable. IOP: Intraocular Pressure p.R390H, the predominant mutation, was found in 50% (5/10) of the families with CYP1B1-linked PCG, totaling 18 patients (Figure 1). All patients with the p.R390H mutation showed bilateral congenital glaucoma with variable severity and clinical features (Table 1). The maximum bilateral elevated IOP, 40 mmHg, was recorded in the patients of families LUGL02 and LUGL19. All patients had enlarged cornea with maximum diameter up to 15 mm except a few physical eyes. Congenital bilateral corneal opacity was observed in the patients of families LUGL02 and LUGL15. Three patients in family LUGL02, V:3, V:5, and V:6, who underwent early left trabeculectomy, showed corneal opacity in the right eye only. The cornea was clear in the patients of families LUGL03, LUGL17, and LUGL19. Two patients in families LUGL15 and LUGL17 showed restored visual acuity after undergoing bilateral trabeculectomy. p.A115P was found in the homozygous state in three patients of family LUGL06. The patients were affected with congenital glaucoma with maximum IOP of 40 mmHg. The age of the patients ranged from 2.5 to 30 years. One patient, IV:11, had no perception of light, while patient IV:10 had reduced visual acuity up to counting of fingers. The patients underwent left and right eye trabeculectomy, respectively (Table 1). Five clinically normal individuals, III:1, IV:3, IV:4, IV:12, and IV:13, in two generations of family LUGL06 were also homozygous for p.A115P (Figure 2 and Table 2). Bioinformatics tools predicted this substitution was pathogenic and was not observed in 120 control chromosomes.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of normal individuals of LUGL06 homozygous for p.A115P.

Family ID (Mutation)
Patient NoDisease
statusCurrent ageCorneal diameter
Corneal edema
Corneal opacity
Habbs’ Striae
IOP (mmHg)
Visual acuity
C/D ratio
OS/OD (mm)OS/ODOS/ODOS/ODOS/ODOS/OD
LUGL06 (p.A115P)
III:1
Normal
25
11/10
−/−
−/−
−/−
12/14
6/6
0.2/0.3
IV:3
Normal
32
11/10.5
−/−
−/−
−/−
13/12
6/6
0.2/0.2
IV:4
Normal
20
12/11
−/−
−/−
−/−
14/13
6/6
0.3/0.2
IV:12
Normal
29
12/12
−/−
−/−
−/−
14/14
6/6
0.3/0.2
IV13Normal4011/11.5−/−−/−−/−12/126/60.3/0.3
Homozygous p.E229K segregated with disease phenotype in three patients of family LUGL07 (Figure 2). Two patients, IV:3 and IV:4, age 16 and 19 years currently, respectively, exhibited no perception of light in both eyes, while the third patient, IV:5, at the age of 20 years had reduced visual acuity to the perception of light and underwent bilateral trabeculectomy. The maximum IOP recorded was 41.5 mmHg, and all patients had severe corneal opacity (Table 1). Affected members of family LUGL13 were homozygous for an insertion c.868_869insC. The mutation segregated with disease phenotype in all patients (Figure 2). The maximum IOP, 42 mmHg, was recorded in the left eye of patient V:5. Normal corneal diameter was observed bilaterally in patients V:3 and V:4 while patient V:4 had megalocornea with the diameter measuring 16 mm in the left eye. The presence of corneal opacity was not consistent in all patients; two patients, V:3 and V:5, had bilateral corneal opacity, whereas V:2 and V:4 had corneal opacity only in the right and left eye, respectively. Patients V:3 and V:4, however, exhibited visual acuity up to 1/60 and 6/12 (Table 1). Two novel alleles were identified in families LUGL09 and LUGL08 (Figure 3). The affected members of LUGL09 were diagnosed with bilateral congenital glaucoma, with maximum IOP, 40 mmHg, recorded in patient IV:01. The patient di not undergo surgical intervention, and she had a C/D ratio of 0.4 in the left eye (Table 1). Visual acuity was recorded to fixation and follow in the left eye. Patient IV:3 underwent bilateral trabeculectomy and had normal intraocular pressure. CYP1B1 sequencing in both patients revealed a homozygous deletion of 12 bp, GGGCCAGGCGGC, c.198–209del 12, resulting in deletion of four amino acids, p.G67-A70del; glycine at 67, glutamine at 68, and alanine at 69 and 70 from the CYP1B1 protein (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Both parents and one normal sibling in the family were heterozygous.
Figure 4

Multiple sequence alignment of CYP1B1 proteins from various species. Boxed amino acids are conserved in all species and cause primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) when substituted or deleted.

Multiple sequence alignment of CYP1B1 proteins from various species. Boxed amino acids are conserved in all species and cause primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) when substituted or deleted. The family LUGL08 has four affected members diagnosed with bilateral congenital glaucoma. The maximum IOP recorded was 35 mmHg in patient IV:01. The current ages of the patients ranged from 3 to 35 years (Table 1). The affected individuals revealed bilateral corneal opacity except patient IV:6. Visual acuity in patients IV:1 and IV:2 was from fixation and follow to no perception of light; patients IV:5 and IV:6, however, had no perception of light (Table 1). On sequencing a novel missense mutation, substituting glycine at the 107th nucleotide to aspartic acid, resulting in the replacement of glycine 36 with aspartic acid was identified (Figure 3). All patients were homozygous while six normal parents and three siblings were heterozygous. Both variants were predicted to be pathogenic by bioinformatics tools and were not found in the 120 ethnically matched control chromosomes. Six previously reported SNPs, rs2617266, rs10012, rs1056827, rs1056836, rs1056837, and rs1800440, were identified in this cohort. These SNPs were used to generate haplotypes for the CYP1B1 mutations, and three different haplotypes were obtained in these patients. Five families harboring the p.R390H mutation and a novel mutation p.G36D shared the same haplotype, C-C-G-C-C-G. Two families harboring p.A115P and c.868_869insC mutations had the same haplotype, C-C-G-G-T-A; the remaining two families with p.E229K and novel deletion p.Gly67-Ala70del shared the same haplotype, T-G-T-C-C-A (Table 3).
Table 3

Haplotypes associated with CYP1B1 mutations in Pakistani PCG patients.

FamilyMutationrs2617266rs10012rs1056827rs1056836rs1056837rs1800440
LUGL02
p.R390H
C
C
G
C
C
G
LUGL03
p.R390H
C
C
G
C
C
G
LUGL15
p.R390H
C
C
G
C
C
G
LUGL17
p.R390H
C
C
G
C
C
G
LUGL19
p.R390H
C
C
G
C
C
G
LUGL06
p.A115P
C
C
G
G
T
A
LUGL07
p.E229K
T
G
T
C
C
A
LUGL08
p.G67-A70del
T
G
T
C
C
A
LUGL09
p.G36D
C
C
G
C
C
G
LUGL13c.868_869insCCCGGTA

Discussion

Primary congenital glaucoma is a rare form of glaucoma leading to irreversible blindness and follows a recessive mode of inheritance [21]. CYP1B1 is major contributing gene for PCG, and its prevalence ranges from 70% to 100% in consanguineous and inbred populations [22]. In this study, we screened 20 consanguineous Pakistani families affected with congenital glaucoma and found CYP1B1 mutations segregating with disease phenotype in 50% (10/20) of the families, which is comparable with the prevalence of CYP1B1 mutations (44%) in the Indian population and is higher than Chinese (17.2%) [23] but lower than Iranians (70%) [24]. The p.R390H mutation was detected first in a patient of Pakistani origin [8]. Since then, this mutation has been identified as the second most common mutation in Indian and Iranian patients affected with congenital glaucoma, accounting for 16% and 19.2%, respectively [24,25]. This study revealed p.R390H was the most common mutation in the population accounting for 50% (5/10) of the CYP1B1 alleles and 25% of (5/20) of the families with PCG. This is the highest frequency of p.R390H reported thus far. All patients who harbor the p.R390H mutation were homozygous and showed variable interfamilial and intrafamilial disease severity, clinical features, and surgical success rates (Table1). Patient V:7 in family LUGL02 age 2.5 years showed uncontrollable IOP and severe corneal opacity despite undergoing bilateral trabeculectomy, while his sibling age 6 years exhibited clear cornea, controlled IOP, and a lower C/D ratio after bilateral trabeculectomy (Table 1). Surgical intervention was successful in patients LUGL15:VI:3 and LUGL17:V:4 but failed to control the IOP in patients in family LUGL19. p.R390H has been reported to show variable phenotypes in different populations. Homozygous p.R390H has been found to segregate with juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG) in Taiwanese patients [21]. These variable clinical manifestations of the mutation among ethnically similar and different patients may be attributed to unknown genetic and environmental factors. Homozygous p.A115P segregated with the PCG phenotype in three affected individuals of family LUGL06. Previously, it has been reported in a patient of Indian origin with non-familial PCG [26]. This mutation is near the heme-binding region of the CYP1B1 protein and may cause conformational changes and disturb hydrogen bonding interactions of the protein [27]. Bioinformatics tools predicted this substitution was probably damaging with deleterious effects on protein function. In this study, five clinically normal individuals in family LUGL06 were also found to be homozygous for p.A115P (Figure 2 and Table 2). This could be due to either non-penetrance or variable expression of CYP1B1 mutations, which has been described in glaucoma patients in Saudi Arabia and Iran [13,14]. Previously, there has been no report of non-penetrance and variable expressivity for p.A115P. The ages of the five unaffected individuals with homozygous p.A115P ranged from 20 to 40 years; thus, variable expression of p.A115P with late disease onset may not be excluded. These individuals may require ophthalmological follow-up to detect early disease symptoms. Non-penetrance or variable expressivity of p.A115P in five unaffected individuals suggests the presence of a modifier locus that may be responsible for suppressing the disease phenotype. In earlier studies, homozygous p.E229K has been reported segregating with PCG in various populations including Pakistani population [15]. This study found three patients were homozygous for p.E229K in family LUGL07 with severe phenotype. All patients had uncontrollable IOP and bilateral corneal opacity with no perception of light. Surgical intervention was not successful in these patients. Heterozygous p.E229K has also been reported to segregate in patients with PCG and late onset primary open angle glaucoma [14,28,29]. In this study, all the carriers of p.E229K were phenotypically normal. This severe phenotype of p.E229K homozygous mutants and clinically normal carriers is in agreement with previously reported findings from Pakistan [15]. No frameshift mutation in CYP1B1, segregating with PCG has been reported from Pakistan before this study. The present study revealed an insertion of cytosine at c.868_869insC, causing frameshift and truncation of the protein (p.R290fs*37) in four affected members of family LUGL13. This was one of the first mutations reported in CYP1B1 in two American families [8]. The detailed phenotype of this mutation has not been described thus far. The patients who were homozygous for c.868_869ins C showed less severe phenotype than the individuals affected with other mutations reported in this study. Patient V:3 had controlled IOP and visual acuity of 1/60 in both eyes after bilateral trabeculectomy. Patient V:4 did not undergo any surgical intervention and had bilaterally normal IOP and 6/12 visual acuity in the right eye (Table 1). A novel missense mutation, c.107 G to A, substituting glycine at the 36th position with aspartic acid, segregated with disease in family LUGL08. The structure of the first 49 residues from the NH2 terminal end of the CYP1B1 protein has not been determined [25]. Glycine is conserved in the CYP1B1 protein among different species (Figure 4). The wild-type residue is located in the predicted trans-membrane domain and differs in size and charge from the mutant residue. This substitution may affect the hydrophobic interactions, conformation, and functions of the protein [20]. The PolyPhen web tool predicted this substitution was probably damaging with a score of −1. All patients in family LUGL08 have bilateral corneal opacity and uncontrollable IOP after surgical interventions. The second novel allele was a deletion of 12 bp, GGGCCAGGCGGC, c.198–209del12, found in family LUGL09. This mutation resulted in the deletion of four amino acids, p.G67-A70del (Figure 3). Glycine at 67 and alanine at 69 are conserved among CYP1B1 proteins of different species (Figure 4). The PROVIEN web tool was used to predict the possible effect of this deletion. The mutation, with score below −2.5, is pathogenic. This in-frame deletion scored −15.8 and was predicted to be deleterious [19]. Previously, a heterozygous frameshift mutation, which deleted eight nucleotides, c.199–206delGGCCAGGC, was reported in German patients with PCG [30]. Patient LUGL09:IV:3, homozygous for this deletion, showed controlled IOP and maintained visual acuity after bilateral trabeculectomy. Six SNPs, rs2617266, rs10012, rs1056827, rs1056836, rs1056837, and rs1800440, were extensively used to construct haplotypes of the CYP1B1 mutations in ethnically different populations [31,32]. The most common haplotype is C-C-G-G-T-A, which is associated with 50% of CYP1B1 mutations whereas T-G-T-C-C-A and C-C-G-C-C-G are associated with 9.7% and 7% of CYP1B1 mutations, respectively [15]. In this study, the most common haplotype was C-C-G-C-C-G, which was found in six families who harbored p.R390H and p.G36D mutations (Table 3). p.R390H has been reported in the same haplotype background in Indian patients with PCG; although it has been associated with three haplotypes in Iranian patients, including C-C-G-C-C-G [24,32,33]. This indicates that Pakistani and Indian patients with PCG have a common founder for p.R390H; whereas p.R390H may have multiple origins in Iranian patients with PCG. Previously, C-C-G-C-C-G haplotype has been associated with a frameshift mutation in American and Brazilian patients [34]. p.A115P and c.868_869insC were associated with C-C-G-G-T-A, a haplotype frequently found in other populations. Novel deletions p.G67-A70del and p.E229K were associated with T-G-T-C-C-A. p.E229K has been associated with the same haplotype in ethnically different populations [15] The results of the study reflect that CYP1B1 mutations are the predominant cause of primary congenital glaucoma in Pakistani patients. Identification of p.R390H as a frequent mutation on distinct haplotype may help to adopt economic genetic testing services for patients with PCG, and the genotype-phenotype correlation will help and assist in better prognosis for the disease. Non-penetrance shown by p.A115P requires further study to identify factors that may be responsible for suppressing the disease phenotype. Identification of the novel variants indicates the genetic heterogeneity of our population and may lead to better understanding of the disease mechanism.
  34 in total

1.  Multiple CYP1B1 mutations and incomplete penetrance in an inbred population segregating primary congenital glaucoma suggest frequent de novo events and a dominant modifier locus.

Authors:  B A Bejjani; D W Stockton; R A Lewis; K F Tomey; D K Dueker; M Jabak; W F Astle; J R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-02-12       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  CYP1B1 mutation profile of Iranian primary congenital glaucoma patients and associated haplotypes.

Authors:  Fereshteh Chitsazian; Betsabeh Khoramian Tusi; Elahe Elahi; Heidar Amini Saroei; Mohammad H Sanati; Shahin Yazdani; Mohammad Pakravan; Navid Nilforooshan; Yadollah Eslami; Mohammad Ali Zare Mehrjerdi; Reza Zareei; Mahmood Jabbarvand; Ali Abdolahi; Ali R Lasheyee; Arash Etemadi; Behnaz Bayat; Mehdi Sadeghi; Mohammad M Banoei; Behnam Ghafarzadeh; Mohammad R Rohani; Akram Rismanchian; Yvonne Thorstenson; Mansoor Sarfarazi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Disease-causing mutations in proteins: structural analysis of the CYP1B1 mutations causing primary congenital glaucoma in humans.

Authors:  Malkaram S Achary; Aramati B M Reddy; Subhabrata Chakrabarti; Shirly G Panicker; Anil K Mandal; Niyaz Ahmed; Dorairajan Balasubramanian; Seyed E Hasnain; Hampapathalu A Nagarajaram
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Overview of Cytochrome P450 1B1 gene mutations in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Ni Li; Yong Zhou; Liang Du; Maoling Wei; Xiaoming Chen
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  CYP1B1 and MYOC mutations in 116 Chinese patients with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Yuhong Chen; Deke Jiang; Long Yu; Bradley Katz; Kang Zhang; Bo Wan; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10

6.  Null mutations in LTBP2 cause primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Manir Ali; Martin McKibbin; Adam Booth; David A Parry; Payal Jain; S Amer Riazuddin; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Shaheen N Khan; Sabika Firasat; Mike Shires; David F Gilmour; Katherine Towns; Anna-Louise Murphy; Dimitar Azmanov; Ivailo Tournev; Sylvia Cherninkova; Hussain Jafri; Yasmin Raashid; Carmel Toomes; Jamie Craig; David A Mackey; Luba Kalaydjieva; Sheikh Riazuddin; Chris F Inglehearn
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Variable expressivity and high penetrance of CYP1B1 mutations associated with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Fatemeh Suri; Shahin Yazdani; Mehrnaz Narooie-Nejhad; Seyed Jalal Zargar; Seyed Hassan Paylakhi; Sirous Zeinali; Mohammad Pakravan; Elahe Elahi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Screening of CYP1B1 and LTBP2 genes in Saudi families with primary congenital glaucoma: genotype-phenotype correlation.

Authors:  Khaled K Abu-Amero; Essam A Osman; Ahmed Mousa; Joshua Wheeler; Benjamin Whigham; R Rand Allingham; Michael A Hauser; Saleh A Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Investigation of CYP1B1 mutations in Chinese patients with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Mei Yang; Xiangming Guo; Xing Liu; Huangxuan Shen; Xiaoyun Jia; Xueshan Xiao; Shiqiang Li; Shaohua Fang; Qingjiong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 10.  The Human Gene Mutation Database: building a comprehensive mutation repository for clinical and molecular genetics, diagnostic testing and personalized genomic medicine.

Authors:  Peter D Stenson; Matthew Mort; Edward V Ball; Katy Shaw; Andrew Phillips; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of CYP1B1 Gene Mutations in Patients with Primary Congenital Glaucoma.

Authors:  Leila Chouiter; Sellama Nadifi
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2017-04-21

2.  Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in CYP1B1-Associated Primary Congenital Glaucoma Patients Representing Two Large Cohorts from India and Brazil.

Authors:  Mônica Barbosa de Melo; Anil K Mandal; Ivan M Tavares; Mohammed Hasnat Ali; Meha Kabra; José Paulo Cabral de Vasconcellos; Sirisha Senthil; Juliana M F Sallum; Inderjeet Kaur; Alberto J Betinjane; Christiane R Moura; Jayter S Paula; Karita A Costa; Mansoor Sarfarazi; Mauricio Della Paolera; Simone Finzi; Victor E F Ferraz; Vital P Costa; Rubens Belfort; Subhabrata Chakrabarti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  First Results from the Prospective German Registry for Childhood Glaucoma: Phenotype-Genotype Association.

Authors:  Julia V Stingl; Stefan Diederich; Heidi Diel; Alexander K Schuster; Felix M Wagner; Panagiotis Chronopoulos; Fidan Aghayeva; Franz Grehn; Jennifer Winter; Susann Schweiger; Esther M Hoffmann
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Mutational analysis of CYP1B1 (rs56010818) variant in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) affected patients of Pakistan.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Narsani; Ali Muhammad Waryah; Muhammad Rafiq; Hina Shaikh; Syed Habib Ahmed Naqvi; Raveet Kumar; Pawan Kumar
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Mutation screening of the CYP1B1 gene reveals thirteen novel disease-causing variants in consanguineous Pakistani families causing primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Raeesa Tehreem; Anam Arooj; Sorath Noorani Siddiqui; Shagufta Naz; Kiran Afshan; Sabika Firasat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Next-generation whole exome sequencing to delineate the genetic basis of primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Bushra Rauf; Shahid Y Khan; Xiaodong Jiao; Bushra Irum; Ramla Ashfaq; Mubashra Zehra; Asma A Khan; Muhammad Asif Naeem; Mohsin Shahzad; Sheikh Riazuddin; J Fielding Hejtmancik; S Amer Riazuddin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  A spectrum of CYP1B1 mutations associated with primary congenital glaucoma in families of Pakistani descent.

Authors:  Bushra Rauf; Bushra Irum; Firoz Kabir; Sabika Firasat; Muhammad Asif Naeem; Shaheen N Khan; Tayyab Husnain; Sheikh Riazuddin; Javed Akram; S Amer Riazuddin
Journal:  Hum Genome Var       Date:  2016-08-04

8.  Investigation of CYP1B1 Gene Involvement in Primary Congenital Glaucoma in Iraqi Children.

Authors:  Suzanne Jubair; Salwa H N Al-Rubae'i; Ali N M Al-Sharifi; Ahmed Abdul Jabbar Suleiman
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-29

9.  SVEP1 as a Genetic Modifier of TEK-Related Primary Congenital Glaucoma.

Authors:  Terri L Young; Kristina N Whisenhunt; Jing Jin; Sarah M LaMartina; Sean M Martin; Tomokazu Souma; Vachiranee Limviphuvadh; Fatemeh Suri; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Xue Zhang; Yongwook Dan; Evie Anagnos; Susana Carmona; Nicole M Jody; Nickie Stangel; Emily C Higuchi; Samuel J Huang; Owen M Siggs; Maria José Simões; Brendan M Lawson; Jacob S Martin; Elahe Elahi; Mehrnaz Narooie-Nejad; Behzad Fallahi Motlagh; Susan E Quaggin; Heather D Potter; Eduardo D Silva; Jamie E Craig; Conceição Egas; Reza Maroofian; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Yasmin S Bradfield; Stuart W Tompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.