Literature DB >> 29540704

Detection of mutations in MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1 in Chinese juvenile onset open-angle glaucoma using exome sequencing.

Chukai Huang1, Lijing Xie1, Zhenggen Wu1, Yingjie Cao1, Yuqian Zheng1, Chi-Pui Pang1,2, Mingzhi Zhang3.   

Abstract

Juvenile onset open-angle glaucoma (JOAG) affects patients before 40 years of age, causing high intraocular pressure and severe optic nerve damage. To expand the mutation spectrum of the causative genes in JOAG, with a view to identify novel disease-causing mutations, we investigated MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1 in a cohort of 67 unrelated Chinese JOAG patients. Whole exome sequencing was used to identify possible pathogenic mutations, which were further excluded in normal controls. After sequencing and the use of a database pipeline, as well as predictive assessment filtering, we identified a total of six mutations in three genes, MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1. Among them, 2 heterozygous mutations in MYOC (c. 1109C > T, p. (P370L); c. 1150G > C, p. (D384H)), 2 heterozygous mutations in OPTN (c. 985A > G, p.(R329G); c. 1481T > G, p. (L494W)) and 2 homozygous mutations in CYP1B1 (c. 1412T > G, p.(I471S); c. 1169G > A, p.(R390H)) were identified as potentially causative mutations. No mutation was detected in NTF4 or WDR36. Our results enrich the mutation spectra and frequencies of MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 in JOAG among the Chinese population. Further studies are needed to address the pathogenicity of each of the mutations detected in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29540704      PMCID: PMC5852028          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22337-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Glaucoma, the second leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide[1], is a group of heterogeneous optic neuropathies characterized by retinal nerve fibre layer damage and visual field defects. The disease is progressive and leads to permanent visual impairment and even blindness in some patients[2]. Age and high intraocular pressure (IOP) are the main risk factors. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a common form of glaucoma, which can be further subdivided into juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma (JOAG) and adult-onset POAG according to the age of onset[3]. JOAG patients often have higher intraocular pressure (IOP) and suffer from more severe optic nerve damage than adult-onset POAG patients[4]. Genetic factors play an important role in the development of glaucoma[5]. Several genes have been identified to be associated with POAG, primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) and JOAG, including myocilin (MYOC)[6]; optineurin (OPTN)[7]; WD repeat domain 36 (WDR36)[8]; neurotrophin 4 (NTF4)[9]; and cytochrome P450 family 1, subfamily B(CYP1B1)[10]. The same candidate gene may lead to different phenotypes of glaucoma[11]. MYOC is the first candidate gene mapped for POAG and has been confirmed to be associated with both POAG and JOAG[12]. Mutations of OPTN were found in POAG and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)[13,14]. CYP1B1 is a PCG gene but has also been reported in association with JOAG[15,16]. To date, the mutations of known genes only account for approximately 5% of patients with POAG[17]. Compared with adult-onset POAG, JOAG may be more likely to be genetically determined and less likely the consequence of environment[16]. Investigation of the POAG genes in JOAG might provide a good opportunity for understanding the genetic components and heterogeneity of JOAG. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is available in commercial service and has been proved to be useful in mapping disease genes. It is rapid and comparatively more cost-effective than other genomic technologies, especially for complex diseases[18]. In developmental and congenital glaucoma, WES has led to the identification of novel variants in LTBP2 and PXDN[19]. It has also been used to identify mutations in known genes in primary glaucoma effectively and quickly[20]. In the current study, we performed WES on 67 Chinese JOAG patients to detect the full spectra of variants in MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1, with a view to identify novel disease-causing mutations for JOAG.

Results

From the whole exome results of 67 Chinese JOAG patients, totally 79 variants in MYOC, 354 variants in OPTN, 139 variants in WDR36, 45 variants in NTF4 and 199 variants in CYP1B1 were detected. Among them, a total of 6 variants in MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 were identified as potential disease-causing mutations in 8 patients (11.94%) after a series of filtering steps (Tables 1 and 2). These variants included 2 variants in MYOC, 2 variants in OPTN and 2 variants in CYP1B1 (Fig. 1). The variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. No MYOC or OPTN potential disease causing mutations were detected in 125 controls, while two heterozygous mutations of CYP1B1 (c. 1169G > A p. (R390H)) were found in controls (Table 1).
Table 1

Mutations of MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 identified in this study.

GeneMutationStatusPolyphen2SIFTMutation tasterReported or notFrequency in control
MYOC c.1109C > T p. (P370L)HetD (1)D (0.02)DC (0.999)Reported[26]0/125
MYOC c.1150G > C p. (D384H)HetD (1)D (0)DC (0.999)Novel0/125
OPTN c.1481T > G p. (L494W)HetD (0.999)D (0.03)P (0.712)Reported in ALS[33]0/125
OPTN c.985A > G p. (R329G)HetP (0.856)T (0.17)DC (0.519)Novel0/125
CYP1B1 c.1412T > G p. (I471S)HomD (1)D (0)DC (0.999)Reported[21]0/125
CYP1B1 c.1169G > A p. (R390H)HomD (1)D (0)DC (0.999)Reported[38]2/125 (Het)

Het, heterozygous mutation; D, damaging; DC, disease causing; P, probably damaging; ALS, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; T, tolerated; Hom, homozygous mutation; Reported or not: Mutations with reference citations were reported to be pathogenic.

Table 2

Clinical data of the eight patients with mutations.

Case IDGeneMutationStatusEffectAge of diagnosis (Y)SexIOPC/DVF(MD)
ODOSODOSODOS
G303 MYOC c.1109C > Tp. (P370L)heteroMissense24M54490.91.0−29.36−34.12
G022 MYOC c.1109C > Tp. (P370L)heteroMissense21M40401.01.0NANA
G8–1 MYOC c.1109C > Tp. (P370L)heteroMissense23M42.342.90.90.9−32.28−32.34
G13–1 MYOC c.1150 G > Cp. (D384H)heteroMissense25M3833.60.90.6−20.28−2.88
G335 OPTN c.1481T > Gp. (L494W)heteroMissense33F26190.90.4−29.29−0.84
G092 OPTN c.985A > Gp. (R329G)heteroMissense27M31181.00.6−29.88−0.77
G398 CYP1B1 c.1412T > Gp. (I471S)homoMissense19M47360.90.9−25.78−32.17
G447 CYP1B1 c.1169G > Ap. (R390H)homoMissense29F38170.90.9−33.54−23.84

Note: IOP, intraocular pressure; C/D, cup/disc ratio; VF, visual field; MD, mean defect; hetero, heterozygous mutation; homo, homozygous mutation.

Figure 1

Six variants of MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 identified in this JOAG cohort. Sequence changes detected in the patients with JOAG are presented in the left column, whereas sequences from healthy individuals appear in the right column.

Mutations of MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 identified in this study. Het, heterozygous mutation; D, damaging; DC, disease causing; P, probably damaging; ALS, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; T, tolerated; Hom, homozygous mutation; Reported or not: Mutations with reference citations were reported to be pathogenic. Clinical data of the eight patients with mutations. Note: IOP, intraocular pressure; C/D, cup/disc ratio; VF, visual field; MD, mean defect; hetero, heterozygous mutation; homo, homozygous mutation. Six variants of MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 identified in this JOAG cohort. Sequence changes detected in the patients with JOAG are presented in the left column, whereas sequences from healthy individuals appear in the right column. In , there were two heterozygous mutations (c. 1109C > T, p. (P370L); c. 1150G > C, p. (D384H)) detected from two cases in this study, among which p.D384H was novel (Fig. 2A). Substitution of p.D384H was predicted to affect protein function by Polyphen-2, SIFT and Mutation Taster. Additionally, the mutated amino acid is highly conserved among all the tested species (Fig. 3A). p. (P370L) was a reported mutation associated with POAG.
Figure 2

Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of proteins of MYOC and OPTN. Predicted crystal structures of wild-type (left) and mutant (right) proteins (A–C).

Figure 3

Conservation analysis revealed evolutionary conservation of the mutations by using Clustal Omega. Multiple alignments of the amino acids from different species are shown. The arrow indicates the position of the mutations (A–C).

In , 2 heterozygous mutations (c. 985A > G, p. (R329G); c.1481T > G, p. (L494W)) were detected in two unrelated individual. Among them, p. (R329G) was novel and p. (L494W) was reported in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (Fig. 2B,C). p. (R329G) was predicted to be disease causing by Mutation taster and probably damaging by Polyphen-2. Furthermore, the p. (R329G) mutation occurred at a remarkably conserved region in all the tested species apart from danio (Fig. 3B). Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of proteins of MYOC and OPTN. Predicted crystal structures of wild-type (left) and mutant (right) proteins (A–C). Conservation analysis revealed evolutionary conservation of the mutations by using Clustal Omega. Multiple alignments of the amino acids from different species are shown. The arrow indicates the position of the mutations (A–C). In , 2 homozygous mutations (c.1412T > G, p. (I471S); c.1169G > A, p. (R390H)) were detected in two patients. Both mutations were predicted to be a pathogenic mutation in all three pathogenicity prediction tools used in this study. The I471S mutation was reported in a Chinese primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) study[21].

Discussion

In this study, the results of exome sequencing data from 67 JOAG patients identified 6 mutations in the MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 genes in 8 unrelated patients. Among them, D384H in MYOC and R329G and L494W in OPTN were novel. These mutations are predicted to affect protein function and were absent in 125 control individuals without glaucoma. MYOC is the first identified glaucoma-causing gene[22]. Over 20 mutations in MYOC have been reported, and the frequency of mutation ranged from 10% to 30%[6,23,24] in study cohorts with the familial trait. In the present study, 5.97% (4/67) of JOAG patients carry a heterozygous mutation in MYOC. Three patients have mutant p. (P370L) in the third exon in MYOC. It has been reported that the turnover rate of mutant p. (P370L) in MYOC fusion proteins was much prolonged compared with wild type[25]. The ubiquitin-proteasome function is compromised and autophagy is induced with mutant p. (P370L) in MYOC[25]. Further study showed a causal association between this p. (P370L) mutation of MYOC and juvenile glaucoma with goniodysgenesis[26]. Of the two mutations detected in the present study, p. (P370L) has been previously reported[26,27]. p. (D384H) is a novel mutation in the third exon of MYOC, near the position of p. (P370L). Further studies are needed to investigate the biological functions of these two mutations. The reported role of OPTN in JOAG remains inconsistent. Previous studies have identified several mutations in OPTN associated with POAG[7], including c.C160G[28] and p.(Lys322Glu)[29]. On the other hand, several studies have shown an absence of OPTN mutations in POAG or JOAG[30-32]. L494W has been reported in a Chinese amyotrophic lateral sclerosis study but not in any glaucoma study[33]. The patient who carries p. (L494W) is 33 years old. After a detailed systemic review, we confirmed that she has no manifestation f ALS. The mean age at onset of ALS range from 52.9 to 59.9 years in several reports[33,34]. Therefore, it is necessary to follow that patient at regular intervals. p. (R329G) is a novel mutation in OPTN in our study. Further studies are needed to understand the role of mutations in OPTN in JOAG. CYP1B1 is associated with PCG, characterized by an autosomal recessive model. CYP1B1 is also involved in the development of JOAG. CYP1B1 (G61E, R368H, R390H, E229K, and 4340delG) may be associated with severe or moderate angle abnormalities and plays an important role in PCG[35]. Suri, F., R, et al. first reported that mutations in CYP1B1 were implicated in POAG among Iranians, notably in the juvenile-onset form[36]. Suri, F., R, et al. further reported that PCG nonpenetrant individuals harbouring CYP1B1 mutations may develop JOAG or POAG to varying degrees[37]. The c.1169 G > A, p. (Arg390His) mutation of CYP1B1 may be a risk factor for the development of JOAG[38]. In the current study, a homozygous mutation of R390H in the third exon of CYP1B1 was found in this Chinese JOAG group, consistent with previous reports[38]. A homozygous mutation of I471S in the third exon of CYP1B1 was identified. The locations of Arg390 and I470 at CYP1B1 are in the K helix and L helix, respectively. Both helixes are conserved regions for CYP1B1 and are expected to be involved in proper folding of the molecule. p. (I471S) was first reported to be associated with PCG in a Chinese PCG study[21], indicating that same genotype may have a different degree of phenotypic expression in Chinese PCG and JOAG. López-Garrido et al. have found that the onset of glaucoma in mutant CYP1B1 genotypes may vary even when CYP1B1 activity is completely absent. Residual CYP1B1 activity levels can influence the phenotypic outcome of both homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers, leading to either congenital or non-dominant juvenile glaucoma[39]. These findings help explain why the two homozygous mutations of CYP1B1 found in our study led to the development of JOAG but not PCG. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of mutations in CYP1B1 in the development of JOAG in Chinese patients. No mutations were detected in NTF4 orWDR36. The role of NTF4 in POAG remains controversial. NTF4 is not found to be candidate gene for glaucoma in several studies[40,41]. However, the results of Chen et al., Pasutto et al. and Vithana et al. supported its implication in POAG[42-44]. The mutation frequency of NTF4 is known to be low in the Chinese population[42,44]. Thus, it is not surprising that no mutation was detected in our small cohort. Mutations of WDR36 have been detected in different JOAG populations, including German and Chinese[45,46]. The frequency of mutation of WDR36 is unclear in the Chinese population, and further studies are needed to estimate the WDR36 mutation frequency in this population. This study is limited by the lack of parents’ samples so that we are not able to perform segregation analysis. The mutations carriers’ parents were reported to be free of glaucoma. Therefore, whether the mutations detected are de novo mutations cannot be confirmed as for now. Also, there could be other factors that might have affected the penetrance of the mutations so that the patients, even carried the mutations, might not have developed the disease. JOAG may belongs to heterogeneity with different variants in numerous genes, which makes it some familial but most occurring sporadically. In summary, six variants of MYOC, OPTN and CYP1B1 were found in 11.94% of this Chinese JOAG cohort, including two heterozygous mutations in MYOC in four patients, two heterozygous mutations in OPTN in two patients, and two homozygous mutations in CYP1B1 in two patients. No mutation of NTF4 or WDR36 was detected in this cohort. Although the sample size of this study is small and we have not conducted segregation analysis or functional analyses of the novel mutations, our results provide additional evidence of the mutation spectra and frequencies in Chinese JOAG.

Materials and Methods

Patient recruitment

We recruited unrelated Chinese JOAG patients at the Shantou University/Chinese University of Hong Kong Joint Shantou International Eye Center, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their guardians. The study was conducted following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee of Joint Shantou International Eye Center. The inclusion criteria for patients with JOAG are based on an age of onset between 3 years of age and early adulthood and the manifestation of highly elevated intraocular pressures without angle abnormalities[3]. Briefly, the recruited patients have an onset of open-angle glaucoma between 3 to 40 years old, an intraocular pressure elevated greater than 22 mmHg, characteristic optic disc damage and/or visual field damage, and open angles under gonioscopy. Patients recruited in this study are sporadic JOAG. Blood samples from patients’ parents or siblings were not available. The control subjects were recruited from patients with mild cataracts and age 60 years or above who attended an ophthalmic check-up. The control subjects did not have ophthalmic or systemic diseases.

Mutational screening

Total genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a DNA Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was quantified with Nanodrop 1000 (ND-1000 3.1.0, NanoDrop Spectrophotometer). WES was performed with an Agilent Sure Select All Human Exon v5.0 kit (Santa Clara, US.). DNA fragments were sequenced using an Illumina HisSeq. 4000 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The average sequencing depth was 100-fold. The results were mapped against UCSC hg19 by Burrows-Wheeler Aligner. Exome sequencing results were filtered with the following steps: (1) Noncoding variants without altering splicing sites predicted by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (available in the public domain at http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html) were excluded; (2) The synonymous variants without altering splicing sites were removed; (3) SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than or equal to 1% in the 1000Genome database were excluded; (4) Missense variants predicted to be benign on protein function consistently by Polyphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/), SIFT (availablehttp://sift.jcvi.org)and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) were removed. Detected variants affecting coding residues in MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1 were selected for further validation and analysis. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the candidate variants after filtering. Primers were designed using the Primer3 online tool (Table 3). The methods used to perform Sanger sequencing, including amplification, sequencing, and analysis of the target fragments, have been previously described[47]. Sequence alignment and analysis of variations were performed by using the NovoSNP program[48].
Table 3

Primers used to amplify the sequences harbouring the variants in this study.

Primer NameForwardReverse
CYP1B1_3AGTCATGCAAGGCCTATTACAGCCACTACTCATGAAGAACCGC
MYOC_3ATTTGTCTCCAGGGCTGTCAGGTGCCACAGATGATGAAGG
OPTN_8GGATTGATTCACCAGCCAGTCAAGTTCTCCAGTCCCCAACC
OPTN_13CAGCTTGTATCTGCTATCGGAAGCTCCCACAAGTCTCTGTC

Note: PCR conditions: 35 cycles of amplification. Each cycle consists of 30 s denaturation at 94 °C, 60 s annealing ranging from 59.5 °C to 60.9 °C and 1 min extension at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.

Primers used to amplify the sequences harbouring the variants in this study. Note: PCR conditions: 35 cycles of amplification. Each cycle consists of 30 s denaturation at 94 °C, 60 s annealing ranging from 59.5 °C to 60.9 °C and 1 min extension at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.

Bioinformatics analysis

Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) was used to acquire multiple-sequence alignment of MYOC and OPTN in different species, including Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes, Macaca mulatta, Bos taurus, Felis catus, Mus musculus, Gallus gallus and Danio rerio. Crystal structures of mutant and wild-type proteins were evaluated by Phyre248 (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi? id = index)[49] and further visualized using Pymol Molecular Graphics System (Pymol).
  47 in total

1.  novoSNP, a novel computational tool for sequence variation discovery.

Authors:  Stefan Weckx; Jurgen Del-Favero; Rosa Rademakers; Lieve Claes; Marc Cruts; Peter De Jonghe; Christine Van Broeckhoven; Peter De Rijk
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Primary role of CYP1B1 in Indian juvenile-onset POAG patients.

Authors:  Moulinath Acharya; Suddhasil Mookherjee; Ashima Bhattacharjee; Arun Kumar Bandyopadhyay; Sanjay Kumar Daulat Thakur; Gautam Bhaduri; Abhijit Sen; Kunal Ray
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.367

3.  Sequence analysis of MYOC and CYP1B1 in a Chinese pedigree of juvenile glaucoma with goniodysgenesis.

Authors:  Xiaoming Chen; Naihong Yan; Hongmin Yun; Jingjing Sun; Man Yu; Jiumo Zhou; Guiqun Cao; Hongbo Yin; Mao Li; Xuyang Liu
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.367

4.  Heterozygous NTF4 mutations impairing neurotrophin-4 signaling in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Francesca Pasutto; Tomoya Matsumoto; Christian Y Mardin; Heinrich Sticht; Johann H Brandstätter; Karin Michels-Rautenstrauss; Nicole Weisschuh; Eugen Gramer; Wishal D Ramdas; Leonieke M E van Koolwijk; Caroline C W Klaver; Johannes R Vingerling; Bernhard H F Weber; Friedrich E Kruse; Bernd Rautenstrauss; Yves-Alain Barde; André Reis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  OPTN 691_692insAG is a founder mutation causing recessive ALS and increased risk in heterozygotes.

Authors:  Orly Goldstein; Omri Nayshool; Beatrice Nefussy; Bryan J Traynor; Alan E Renton; Mali Gana-Weisz; Vivian E Drory; Avi Orr-Urtreger
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Null CYP1B1 genotypes in primary congenital and nondominant juvenile glaucoma.

Authors:  María-Pilar López-Garrido; Cristina Medina-Trillo; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Julián Garcia-Feijoo; José-María Martínez-de-la-Casa; Maite García-Antón; Julio Escribano
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Clinical and genetic characteristics of primary juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma (JOAG).

Authors:  Angela V Turalba; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.975

8.  Investigation of CYP1B1 mutations in Chinese patients with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Mei Yang; Xiangming Guo; Xing Liu; Huangxuan Shen; Xiaoyun Jia; Xueshan Xiao; Shiqiang Li; Shaohua Fang; Qingjiong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 9.  An Updated Review on the Genetics of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Khaled Abu-Amero; Altaf A Kondkar; Kakarla V Chalam
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis.

Authors:  Lawrence A Kelley; Stefans Mezulis; Christopher M Yates; Mark N Wass; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 13.491

View more
  15 in total

1.  EFEMP1 rare variants cause familial juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Edward Ryan A Collantes; Manuel S Delfin; Baojian Fan; Justine May R Torregosa; Christine Siguan-Bell; Nilo Vincent de Guzman Florcruz; Jose Maria D Martinez; Barbara Joy Masna-Hidalgo; Vincent Paul T Guzman; Jewel Faith Anotado-Flores; Faye D Levina; Sophia Raine C Hernandez; Anthony A Collantes; Michael Carreon Sibulo; Shisong Rong; Janey L Wiggs
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma - A clinical and genetic update.

Authors:  Harathy Selvan; Shikha Gupta; Janey L Wiggs; Viney Gupta
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.197

Review 3.  Common and rare myocilin variants: Predicting glaucoma pathogenicity based on genetics, clinical, and laboratory misfolding data.

Authors:  Hailee F Scelsi; Brett M Barlow; Emily G Saccuzzo; Raquel L Lieberman
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.700

4.  Glaucoma Cascade Screening in a High Risk Afro-Caribbean Haitian Population: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ta C Chang; Linda Celestin; Elizabeth A Hodapp; Alana L Grajewski; Anna Junk; Adam L Rothman; Eric R H Duerr; Swarup S Swaminathan; Steven J Gedde; Terri L Young; Janey Wiggs; Mildred M G Olivier; Raquel Quintanilla; Esdras Arrieta; Eleonore J Savatovsky; Elizabeth A Vanner; Richard K Parrish
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Mutation profile of glaucoma candidate genes in Mauritanian families with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Mouna Hadrami; Crystel Bonnet; Christina Zeitz; Fatimetou Veten; Med Biya; Cheikh T Hamed; Christel Condroyer; Panfeng Wang; Med Mahmoud Sidi; Sidi Cheikh; Qingjiong Zhang; Isabelle Audo; Christine Petit; Ahmed Houmeida
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Coinheritance of OLFM2 and SIX6 variants in a Chinese family with juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma: A case report.

Authors:  Xue Yang; Nan-Nan Sun; Zhen-Ni Zhao; Shu-Xiang He; Miao Zhang; Dan-Dan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Yu; Jia-Min Zhang; Zhi-Gang Fan
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Identification of candidate genes and pathways in retinopathy of prematurity by whole exome sequencing of preterm infants enriched in phenotypic extremes.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Kemal Sonmez; Ryan Swan; J Peter Campbell; Susan Ostmo; R V Paul Chan; Aaron Nagiel; Kimberly A Drenser; Audina M Berrocal; Jason D Horowitz; Xiaohui Li; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Kent D Taylor; Charles Simmons; Jerome I Rotter; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Delineation of Novel Compound Heterozygous Variants in LTBP2 Associated with Juvenile Open Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Osamah Saeedi; Sairah Yousaf; Joby Tsai; Kathleen Palmer; Saima Riazuddin; Zubair M Ahmed
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  Physiological function of myocilin and its role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma in the trabecular meshwork (Review).

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Mingzhe Li; Zhenzhen Zhang; Haifeng Xue; Xing Chen; Yong Ji
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 10.  Recent advances in genetically modified animal models of glaucoma and their roles in drug repositioning.

Authors:  Chikako Harada; Atsuko Kimura; Xiaoli Guo; Kazuhiko Namekata; Takayuki Harada
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.