| Literature DB >> 22873417 |
Torsten Kaussen1, Pramod Kadaba Srinivasan, Mamdouh Afify, Christiane Herweg, René Tolba, Joachim Conze, Alexander Schachtrupp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to quantify bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes due to different levels of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH; 15 vs. 30 mmHg) lasting for 24 h in a porcine model.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22873417 PMCID: PMC3390291 DOI: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intensive Care ISSN: 2110-5820 Impact factor: 6.925
Histopathological classification of ischemic damage of the intestinal wall according to Park et al. [26]
| Park score | Histopathological appearance/damage of bowel wall |
|---|---|
| Grade 0 | Normal mucosa |
| Grade 1 | Subepithelial space at villous tip |
| Grade 2 | More extended subepithelial space |
| Grade 3 | Epithelial lifting along villus sides |
| Grade 4 | Denuded villi |
| Grade 5 | Loss of villous tissue |
| Grade 6 | Crypt layer infarction |
| Grade 7 | Transmucosal infarction |
| Grade 8 | Transmural infarction |
Histopathological classification of bacterial translocation through the intestinal wall
| Bowel wall translocation score | Histopathological appearance (bacterial count in 10 HPF) |
|---|---|
| Grade 0 | No bacteria detectable (neither in mucosa nor in submucosa) |
| Grade 1 | Few bacteria in the mucosa (up to five findings in 10 HPF) |
| Grade 2 | Many bacteria in the mucosa (more than five findings in 10 HPF) |
| Grade 3 | Bacteria in mucosa as well as in submucosa |
Figure 1CFU in ileocecal MLN of pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h. Mean ± standard error of the mean of cultivable CFU in mesenteric lymph nodes taken from the ileocecal region according to the different levels of IAP (IAP-15/IAP-30: animals with an IAP of 15 mmHg or 30 mmHg, respectively, lasting for 24 h). Please take into consideration the logarithmic scale of the axis of ordinates. Asterisk denotes significant difference to control (IAP-15: p < 0.04; IAP-30: p < 0.01).
Hemodynamic parameters at intervals of 6 h
| Parameter | Group | 0 h | 6 h | 12 h | 18 h | 24 h | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIa | IAP-30bc, | 110.6 ± 21.3 | 62.0 ± 25.5bc, | 44.8 ± 19.2bc, | 39.9 ± 18.7bc, | 22.5 ± 12.7bc, | mL·min-1·m-2 |
| IAP-15bc, | 122.7 ± 43.9 | 95.9 ± 20.3 | 83.8 ± 15.1 | 74.9 ± 13.4b | 71.1 ± 17.9b | L·min-1·m-2 | |
| Controlbc, | 110.7 ± 19.7 | 94.6 ± 11.4 | 75.9 ± 9.2b | 73.7 ± 7.3b | 82.8 ± 17.1b | L·min-1·m-2 | |
| CVPa | IAP-30bc, | 5.2 ± 2.0bc, | 13.0 ± 2.4bc, | 11.5 ± 2.0bc, | 12.0 ± 2.7bc, | 12.5 ± 2.7bc, | mmHgbc, |
| IAP-15bc, | 4.7 ± 1.9bc, | 9.5 ± 2.0bc, | 9.9 ± 1.8bc, | 10.6 ± 4.4bc, | 9.7 ± 2.7bc, | mmHgbc, | |
| Controlbc, | 4.1 ± 3.0bc, | 2.6 ± 2.0bc, | 1.9 ± 1.6bc, | 2.8 ± 2.2bc, | 3.2 ± 1.6bc, | mmHgbc, | |
| EVLWIa | IAP-30bc, | 2.7 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 1.6 | 4.1 ± 2.1 | 4.9 ± 2.0 | 7.3 ± 2.4bc, | mL·kg-1 |
| IAP-15bc, | 2.5 ± 1.1 | 4.4 ± 1.8 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 5.2 ± 2.1 | 5.2 ± 1.3bc, | mL·kg-1 | |
| Control | 2.2 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | mL·kg-1 | |
| GEDVI | IAP-30bc, | 8.2 ± 1.3 | 6.1 ± 1.4 | 5.5 ± 1.7b | 5.8 ± 1.5bc, | 4.0 ± 1.7bc, | mL·m-2 |
| IAP-15bc, | 9.5 ± 2.6 | 9.8 ± 2.0 | 9.6 ± 2.2 | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 9.0 ± 1.9 | mL·m-2 | |
| Control | 8.4 ± 1.4 | 8.4 ± 1.4 | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 9.4 ± 2.4 | 10.1 ± 1.1b | mL·m-2 |
aSignificant change during 24 h according to ANOVA and post-hoc analysis: CI (P = 0.004); CVP (P < 0.001); EVLWI (P = 0.033). bSignificant difference from baseline according to paired t test: CI (IAP-30, 6 h: P = 0.002; IAP-15, 18 h: P = 0.024; control, 12 h: P = 0.004); CVP (IAP-30, 6 h: P < 0.001 and IAP-15, 12 h: P = 0.002); EVLWI (IAP-30, 24 h: P = 0.017 and IAP-15, 24 h: P = 0.013); GEDVI (IAP-30, 18 h: P = 0.026 and control, 24 h: P = 0.038). cSignificant difference from corresponding control according to unpaired t test: CI (IAP-30, 6 h: P = 0.002); CVP (IAP-30, 6 h: P = 0.002 and IAP-15, 12 h: P = 0.002); EVLWI (IAP-30; 24 h: P = 0.014 and IAP-15, 24 h: P = 0.019); GEDVI (IAP-30, 18 h: P = 0.002). IAP-15/IAP-30: animals exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg or 30 mmHg, respectively, lasting for 24 h (each group consisting of six animals).
Results of MAP and associated parameters at intervals of 6 h
| Parameter | Group | 0 h | 6 h | 12 h | 18 h | 24 h | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPab, c, | IAP-30bc, | 72.6 ± 8.1bc, | 70.8 ± 18.7bc, | 60.8 ± 17.8bc, | 52.9 ± 12.1c | 45.0 ± 14.6bc, | mmHgbc, |
| IAP-15bc, | 75.2 ± 14.5bc, | 77.1 ± 9.8bc, | 88.7 ± 10.2bc, | 91.8 ± 18.7bc, | 90.5 ± 17.3b | mmHgbc, | |
| Controlbc, | 71.5 ± 12.9bc, | 70.1 ± 7.7bc, | 80.4 ± 14.1bc, | 82.7 ± 8.0bc, | 83.6 ± 10.2bc, | mmHgbc, | |
| APPa | IAP-30bc, | 67.4 ± 8.3 | 58.3 ± 11.0 | 49.3 ± 18.3bc, | 43.3 ± 17.1bc, | 32.5 ± 16.5bc, | mmHgbc, |
| IAP-15bc, | 70.5 ± 13.8 | 69.4 ± 8.0 | 78.8 ± 10.1 | 79.7 ± 12.1 | 80.8 ± 16.8 | mmHgbc, | |
| Controlbc, | 67.0 ± 14.0 | 67.0 ± 7.1 | 78.5 ± 13.8 | 80.1 ± 10.5 | 80.4 ± 10.2 | mmHgbc, | |
| RFGa | IAP-30bc, | 72.6 ± 8.1 | 13.0 ± 9.6bc, | 7.8 ± 7.2bc, | 4.6 ± 6.6bc, | 0.0 ± 0.0bc, | mmHgbc, |
| IAP-15bc, | 75.2 ± 14.5 | 47.7 ± 8.1bc, | 58.7 ± 10.2bc, | 62.4 ± 16.4bc, | 60.5 ± 17.3bc, | mmHgbc, | |
| Control | 71.5 ± 12.9 | 70.1 ± 8.0 | 80.4 ± 14.1 | 82.8 ± 9.9 | 83.6 ± 10.2 | mmHgbc, |
aSignificant change during 24 h according to ANOVA and post-hoc analysis: MAP (P = 0.037); APP (P = 0.002); RFG (P = 0.001). bSignificant difference from baseline according to paired t test: MAP (IAP-30, 24 h: P = 0.014 and IAP-15, 24 h: P = 0.010); APP (IAP-30, 12 h: P = 0.026); RFG (IAP-30, 6 h: P = 0.007 and IAP-15, 6 h: P = 0.046). cSignificant difference from corresponding control according to unpaired t test: MAP (IAP-30, 18 h: P = 0.004); APP (IAP-30, 12 h: P = 0.001); RFG (IAP-30, 6 h: P = 0.003 and IAP-15, 6 h: P = 0.011). IAP-15/IAP-30: animals exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg or 30 mmHg, respectively, lasting for 24 h (each group consisting of six animals).
Results of blood gas analyses at intervals of 6 h
| Parameter | Group | 0 h | 6 h | 12 h | 18 h | 24 h | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pHab, | IAP-30ab, | 7.40 ± 0.07 | 7.38 ± 0.04 | 7.31 ± 0.09 | 7.28 ± 0.10 | 7.22 ± 0.13ab, | |
| IAP-15ab, | 7.43 ± 0.05 | 7.36 ± 0.10 | 7.47 ± 0.04 | 7.47 ± 0.05 | 7.46 ± 0.04 | ||
| Controlab, | 7.45 ± 0.09 | 7.45 ± 0.07 | 7.51 ± 0.04 | 7.48 ± 0.07 | 7.48 ± 0.05 | ||
| BEc | IAP-30ab, | 1.1 ± 4.3 | -0.8 ± 2.5 | -5.6 ± 6.8 | -6.8 ± 5.9ab, | -10.4 ± 4.6ab, | mmol·L-1ab, |
| IAP-15ab, | -0.5 ± 4.1 | -2.1 ± 3.8 | 3.0 ± 1.9 | 2.2 ± 2.9 | 1.1 ± 2.7 | mmol·L-1ab, | |
| Controlab, | 1.8 ± 2.3 | 3.2 ± 3.0 | 4.9 ± 1.4 | 3.6 ± 2.0 | 3.7 ± 1.2 | mmol·L-1ab, | |
| PO2 | IAP-30ab, | 137.3 ± 30.8 | 124.7 ± 11.1 | 121.27 ± 23.5 | 116.0 ± 18.3 | 105.2 ± 31.0 | mmHgab, |
| IAP-15ab, | 144.9 ± 17.1 | 141.2 ± 18.7 | 132.8 ± 9.7 | 135.6 ± 37.1 | 117.3 ± 40.1 | mmHgab, | |
| Controlab, | 131.5 ± 20.8 | 142.9 ± 23.1 | 128.5 ± 18.2 | 146.6 ± 32.7 | 130.4 ± 14.2 | mmHgab, | |
| PCO2 | IAP-30ab, | 41.6 ± 3.6 | 41.9 ± 4.5 | 37.2 ± 10.2 | 33.2 ± 11.9 | 31.1 ± 13.4 | mmHgab, |
| IAP-15ab, | 35.5 ± 3.8 | 38.8 ± 5.9 | 37.6 ± 2.9 | 35.4 ± 4.9 | 34.6 ± 4.9 | mmHgab, | |
| Control | 38.4 ± 5.8 | 36.9 ± 7.0 | 36.7 ± 4.4 | 36.3 ± 7.5 | 37.1 ± 5.2 | mmHgab, |
aSignificant difference from baseline according to paired t test: pH (IAP-30, 24 h: P = 0.017); BE (IAP-30, 18 h: P = 0.025). bSignificant difference from corresponding control according to unpaired t test: pH (IAP-30, 18 h: P = 0.005); BE (IAP-30, 18 h: P = 0.036). cSignificant change during 24 h according to ANOVA and post-hoc analysis: BE (P = 0.019). IAP-15/IAP-30: animals exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg or 30 mmHg, respectively, lasting for 24 h (each group consisting of six animals).
Figure 2Translocated bacteria in bowel wall specimens of pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h. Histological specimens (Gram-stained) of bowel walls of pigs exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg () and 30 mmHg (, ) for 24 h. Boxes in A1, B1, and C1 (magnification: each ×400) mark extracts which are magnified in A2, B2, and C2 (magnification: each ×1,000). Bowel wall layers are labeled 'M' (tunica mucosa), 'S' (tela submucosa), and 'Musc' (tunica muscularis). 'L': intestinal lumen, 'G': Gruenhagen's space (according to Park's classification [26], ischemic damage to the gut is accompanied by proportionally increasing lifting of epithelia. In this way, the developing space between the mucosa and submucosa is named after Gruenhagen). Histomorphological damage shown in A and B correlates to Park score 1 (B (IAP-15): subepithelial space at villous tips) and 2 (A (IAP-30): extended subepithelial spaces). Cocci as well as rods passed Gruenhagen's space (see arrows) and invaded the tela submucosa (A, B: translocation score 2 to 3). Bacteria shown in C even crossed the tela submucosa and started invading the tunica muscularis (see arrows).
Ischemic damage of the small and large bowel in pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h
| Localization | Control (C) | IAP-15 | IAP-30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small bowel (Park score) | 1 (1 to 2) | 2 (1 to 4)a | 4 (2 to 6)a | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
| Large bowel (Park score) | 1 (1 to 2) | 1 (1 to 2)a | 3 (2 to 5)a | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
Ischemic bowel in pigs exposed to an IAH for 24 h according to the Park score (Table 1, [26]). aSignificantly different from control according to Mann-Whitney U test. IAP-15/IAP-30: animals exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg or 30 mmHg, respectively (each group consisting of six animals).
Bacterial counts in bowel wall specimen of pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h
| Localization | Control (C) | IAP-15 | IAP-30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ileum | 1 (1 to 2) | 1 (1 to 1) | 1.5 (1 to 3) | n.s. | n.s. |
| Ileocecal junction | 1.5 (1 to 2) | 1 (1 to 2) | 2 (1 to 3) | n.s. | n.s. |
| Cecum | 1 (0 to 1) | 1 (1 to 1) | 1 (1 to 2) | n.s. | n.s. |
| Overall | 1 (0 to 2) | 1 (1 to 2) | 2 (1 to 3)a | n.s. | 0.044 |
Translocated bacteria in the ileum, ileocecal junction, and cecum of pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h according to translocation score (referring to 10 high-power fields): grade 0: no bacteria in the mucosa and submucosa, grade 1: bacteria in up to 5 of 10 high-power fields of the mucosa, grade 2: bacteria in more than 5 of 10 high-power fields of the mucosa, and grade 3: bacteria in the mucosa and even submucosa. aSignificant difference to control according to Mann-Whitney U testing. IAP-15/IAP-30: animals exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg or 30 mmHg, respectively, lasting for 24 h (each group consisting of six animals).
Figure 3Translocated bacteria in MLN specimens of pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h. Histological specimens (Gram-stained, each ×1,000) of MLNs of pigs exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg (D) and 30 mmHg (A, B, C) for 24 h. Cocci (A, D) as well as rods (B, C, D) were detectable (see arrows).
Figure 4Bacterial counts in MLN of pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h. Median (minimum to maximum) of bacterial counts per mesenteric lymph node of the small and large bowel (ileum and colon) of pigs exposed to an IAP of 15 mmHg (IAP-15) or 30 mmHg (IAP-30) for 24 h. Results given as sum as well as distinguished between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Asterisk denotes significant difference between bacterial counts in MLN of treatment group pigs and controls (P < 0.05).
Microbiologically detected bacterial species in pigs exposed to IAH for 24 h
| Kinds of microbiologically detected bacteria | |
|---|---|
| Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) | Portal vein blood (PVB) |
Literature overviews of currently published animal experiments concerning bacterial translocation under the influence of IAH
| Author | Model, weight | IAH performed via | IAH | IAH length | Additional intervention | Detection of bacterial translocation (BT) | Microbiologically proven bacteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleftheriadis et al. | Rats, | CO2-pneumo-peritoneum | 15 mmHg | 1 h | Decomp.+ reperf. for 3 h or 18 h | 3 hb: MLN, liver, spleen | |
| Diebel et al. [ | Rats, | CO2-pneumo-peritoneum | 20 to 25 mmHg | 1 h | Maintenance of MAP by additional fluids | Spleenb | |
| Tug et al. | Dogsa, | CO2-pneumo-peritoneum | 15 mmHg | 0.5 or 2 h | - | ns.: PVB, MLN, liver, spleen, and peritoneum | Not given |
| Doty et al. | Pigsa, | Instillation of saline (intra-abdominal) | 30 mmHg | 1 h | 1. Hemorrhage 30 min | n.s.: PVB, MLN, spleen | PVB: |
| Polat et al. | Rats, | CO2-pneumo-peritoneum | 14, 20, or 25 mmHg | 1 h | Decomp. + reperf. for 4 h | 14 mmHg: n.s. | Gram (-) > Gram (+) |
| Cheng et al. | Rabbits | N2-pneumo-peritoneum | 10, 20, or 30 mmHg | 1, 2, or 4 h | - | 10 mmHg: n.s. (1 h, 2 h, 4 h) | Not given |
| Yagci et al. | Rabbits, | Inflation of an intra-abdominal bag | 10, 15, 20, or 25 mmHg | 12 h | - | 10 mmHgb: spleen | Gram (-) > Gram (+) |
| Sukhotnik et al. | Rats, | Air-pneumo-peritoneum | 15 or 25 mmHg | 1 h | Decomp. + reperf. for 24 h | controls: 30% BT | |
| Gong et al. | Rats, | N2-pneumo-peritoneum | 20 mmHg | 1 h | Decomp. + reperf. for 4 h | ACSb: MLN > liver > spleen | Predominating bacterium: |
| Kubiak et al. | Pigsa, | Placement of fecal clot i.a. + clamping of superior mesenteric artery | 20 mmHg and more | 48 h | - | 100% bacteremia (BT) |
aLarge-animal models (in contrast to small-animal models). bSignificant difference compared to controls; n.s., no significant difference compared to controls. ACS, abdominal compartment syndrome (group); BT, bacterial translocation; CO2, carbon dioxide; De/decomp. + reperf., decompression and following reperfusion after IAH; Gram (+)/(-), Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria; IAH, intra-abdominal hypertension; MLN, mesenteric lymph nodes; PB, peripheral blood; PVB, portal vein blood; spp.: not further differentiated species of bacteria; vol.: administration of fluids (volume overload).
Staging of bacterial transformation
| Level | Distribution | Microbiological findings |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Local BT | Detection of gut-derived bacteria in mesenteric lymph nodes |
| Level 2 | Regional BT | Detection of gut-derived bacteria in portal vein blood or liver |
| Level 3 | Systemic BT | Detection of gut-derived bacteria in peripheral blood or other organs |
Modified from Sukhotnik et al. [19]