Literature DB >> 17469725

What is the best animal model for ACS?

A Schachtrupp1, J Wauters, A Wilmer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment of the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is based on consensus definitions but several questions regarding fluid regime or critical level of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH)) remain unsolved. It is questionable whether these issues can be addressed in prospective randomized trials in the near future. This review aimed to summarize current animal models and to outline requirements for the best model.
METHODS: PubMed data base was searched for articles describing animal models of ACS.
RESULTS: 25 articles were found. ACS in animals has not been defined yet. Investigations varied considerably regarding the experimental design. Animals were rats, rabbits, dogs and pigs with a bodyweight from 200g to 70 kg. IAP increase varied from 20 to 50 mmHg.The time period of IAH ranged between 30 min and 24h. The time between the IAH insult and organ dysfunction varied between 15 min and 18h. Investigations demonstrated that IAH is able to induce loss of intravascular volume, organ hypoperfusion, ischemic organ damage and multiple organ failure within 4 to 6h.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to IAH or pneumoperitoneum for surgical exposure, ACS in an animal may be stated if an artificially increased IAP leads to circulatory, respiratory and renal insufficiency. A next step in animal research would be the development of a "pathological" model in which haemorrhage or systemic inflammation together with resuscitation lead to abdominal fluid accumulation and increased intra-abdominal pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Clin Belg        ISSN: 1784-3286            Impact factor:   1.264


  15 in total

1.  A clinically applicable porcine model of septic and ischemia/reperfusion-induced shock and multiple organ injury.

Authors:  Brian D Kubiak; Scott P Albert; Louis A Gatto; Christopher J Vieau; Shreyas K Roy; Kathleen P Snyder; Kristopher G Maier; Gary F Nieman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Evaluating the effects of immediate application of negative pressure therapy after decompression from abdominal compartment syndrome in an experimental porcine model.

Authors:  S K Shah; F Jimenez; P A Walker; H Xue; T D Feeley; K S Uray; K C Norbury; R H Stewart; G A Laine; C S Cox
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on adrenal gland function and morphology in rats.

Authors:  Nezih Akkapulu; Mehmet Bulent Tirnaksiz; Ibrahim Kulac; Gaye Guler Tezel; Mutlu Hayran; Ahmet Bulent Dogrul; Erdinc Cetinkaya; Kaya Yorganci
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Increasing abdominal pressure with and without PEEP: effects on intra-peritoneal, intra-organ and intra-vascular pressures.

Authors:  Stephan M Jakob; Rafael Knuesel; Jyrki J Tenhunen; Richard Pradl; Jukka Takala
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  In vitro validation of a novel method for continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Inneke De laet; Dries Viaene; Karen Schoonheydt; Hilde Dits
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Comparison of a new device for the continuous intra-gastric measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (CiMon) with direct intra-peritoneal measurements in cirrhotic patients during paracentesis.

Authors:  Valentin Becker; Roland M Schmid; Andreas Umgelter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Evaluating intra-abdominal pressures in a porcine model of acute lung injury by using a wireless motility capsule.

Authors:  Stefan Rauch; Amelie Johannes; Bernd Zollhöfer; Ralf M Muellenbach
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-05

8.  Commonly applied positive end-expiratory pressures do not prevent functional residual capacity decline in the setting of intra-abdominal hypertension: a pig model.

Authors:  Adrian Regli; Lisen E Hockings; Gabrielle C Musk; Brigit Roberts; Bill Noffsinger; Bhajan Singh; Peter V van Heerden
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Strategies for modulating the inflammatory response after decompression from abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  Shinil K Shah; Fernando Jimenez; Phillip A Letourneau; Peter A Walker; Stacey D Moore-Olufemi; Randolph H Stewart; Glen A Laine; Charles S Cox
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Temporal differences in the development of organ dysfunction based on two different approaches to induce experimental intra-abdominal hypertension in swine.

Authors:  Michael Moller; Ulrik K Kjerkegaard; Jens Larsen; Hanne Birke-Sorensen; Lars B Stolle
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.